Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
Older kids don't always outperform younger kids. My older kid is near the bottom of her class. Some of the younger ones are the stars.
Two of my other kids would have benefited from redshirting (one academically, one socially).
Yeah, what a horrible parent you are for not cheating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
Older kids don't always outperform younger kids. My older kid is near the bottom of her class. Some of the younger ones are the stars.
Two of my other kids would have benefited from redshirting (one academically, one socially).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
Older kids don't always outperform younger kids. My older kid is near the bottom of her class. Some of the younger ones are the stars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
Older kids don't always outperform younger kids. My older kid is near the bottom of her class. Some of the younger ones are the stars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s obvious why people redshirt. I have three boys, born in late May, January, November. The January and November birthdays are in such a better position as far as maturity, ability to sit still and focus in the early years, physical ability, academic readiness, etc. I think this is especially true because they are boys. My May birthday son has been fine, but an extra 4+ months would have been a big advantage.
My son was born in early March... do you think he will be middle of the pack? He is 2 now. My older kids have fall birthdays and have always been older like yours
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s obvious why people redshirt. I have three boys, born in late May, January, November. The January and November birthdays are in such a better position as far as maturity, ability to sit still and focus in the early years, physical ability, academic readiness, etc. I think this is especially true because they are boys. My May birthday son has been fine, but an extra 4+ months would have been a big advantage.
Anonymous wrote:My son has a June birthday, so redshirting never applied to us. However, I think the reason why someone would redshirt is obvious; being older than your classmates is a HUGE advantage. There has been study after study to show that older students do much better all throughout school. Of course, if you do better in school, you'll go to a better college. If you go to a better college, you'll get a better job, and if you get a better job, you'll be able afford a happier lifestyle.
This information actually raises the opposite question: Why is it that the vast majority of parents don't redshirt their kids when it'll give them a massive advantage? Like, seriously, I've only ever known 3 fall-born kids whose parents waited until they were almost 6 to send them to Kindergarten.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish I would've 1. known what "redshirting" even was and 2. that I would've done so.
I could see DS benefitting from it socially, emotionally, physically. Academically, he's ahead so not sure if that would've made things tricky (ex: was reading summer before Kinder, was reading Harry Potter in 1st grade so I do wonder if boredom issues would've occurred if I'd started him a year later).
I'm sorry it didn't occur to you to cheat. What a horrible parent you are playing by the rules.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I am convinced that she’s annoyed her kid is “behind” some older classmate and she can’t get beyond it.
What's annoying is when the older kids are rewarded for outperforming the younger kids. Why should someone be rewarded for an accomplishment that was inevitable?
But this is wrong. I redshirted my august 28th (September 1st cutoff) and she is closer to her classmates age now than she would have been had I not redshirted. The youngest child in her class was born beginning of June. The oldest is 2 weeks older than DD. Then there are several September and October birthdays... I think the median birthday in her class is January (maybe even December). My DD is with her peers now and would have been unfairly compared to much older kids has she gone the year before with a boy that was over a year older than she is and with most of her class 10-8 months older. I did not redshirt for academic or sport, but for social and emotional considerations. Had my DD been born in July or June, I would have had a harder decision to make