Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
You don’t know how that they didn’t believe her, there was not enough proof to find him guilty. Two very different things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deplorables are amazing. Didn’t see “it’s impossible for anyone to ever have been sexually assaulted in a department store dressing room” as something that any person would ever claim.
+1
A very true statement.
I found her story compelling. However it was odd that bergdorff should have an empty department. That is unthinkable to me- or that a sales person would not follow the king of New York.
I saw a video of this woman and she’s off beat. I also saw her tweet that she loved the apprentice which is weird.
The tragedy of these types of crimes is that it is so hard to protect victims and the falsely accused. Because there is rarely much evidence.
Plus, not remembering what year.
This is not the same issue as Christine Ford of being totally vague on dates. Carroll gave a date within a month, either December 1995 or January 1996.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
That is weird. They have to believe her to find against Trump, but then they believe she lied about the rape?
The jury believed that a preponderance of the evidence showed that she was sexually abused but that a preponderance of the evidence did not show that she was raped. Carroll testified and then her two friends who she told immediately afterwards all testified, and it was unclear as to New York law which is very specific whether she was penetrated by Trumps penis or something else. Not really a win for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty shitty of Trump to sexually assault her and then defame her. I think everyone can agree on that.
Hmmm...have any political figures done that before?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
That is weird. They have to believe her to find against Trump, but then they believe she lied about the rape?
The jury believed that a preponderance of the evidence showed that she was sexually abused but that a preponderance of the evidence did not show that she was raped. Carroll testified and then her two friends who she told immediately afterwards all testified, and it was unclear as to New York law which is very specific whether she was penetrated by Trumps penis or something else. Not really a win for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
That is weird. They have to believe her to find against Trump, but then they believe she lied about the rape?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
I’ve served as a juror in both criminal and civil cases. You cannot infer what the jury believes. You can only infer that there was not unanimous agreement that the burden of proof was met on that particular charge. When I was a juror in a criminal trial, every single one of us believed that the defendant was guilty, but we followed the judge’s instructions and disregarded improper testimony and found the defendant not guilty because the arresting officer, a rookie making his first solo arrest, screwed up so badly procedurally that the prosecution couldn’t meet the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. There may very well be some jurors who believe Trump raped Carroll, but there are negotiations and compromises to reach unanimous verdicts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She won the case.
Donald Trump is and always has been a joke, as are every one of his voters. The only new voters he’s acquiring are the brainwashed and brain damaged.
Not to be too particular, but he was not found liable for rape. Even a New York jury didn't believe her rape claim. He was found liable for "sexual abuse." So as much as she won part of the case, she lost on the part that people are running with--rape.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deplorables are amazing. Didn’t see “it’s impossible for anyone to ever have been sexually assaulted in a department store dressing room” as something that any person would ever claim.
+1
A very true statement.
I found her story compelling. However it was odd that bergdorff should have an empty department. That is unthinkable to me- or that a sales person would not follow the king of New York.
I saw a video of this woman and she’s off beat. I also saw her tweet that she loved the apprentice which is weird.
The tragedy of these types of crimes is that it is so hard to protect victims and the falsely accused. Because there is rarely much evidence.
Plus, not remembering what year.
Anonymous wrote:Pretty shitty of Trump to sexually assault her and then defame her. I think everyone can agree on that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deplorables are amazing. Didn’t see “it’s impossible for anyone to ever have been sexually assaulted in a department store dressing room” as something that any person would ever claim.
+1
A very true statement.
I found her story compelling. However it was odd that bergdorff should have an empty department. That is unthinkable to me- or that a sales person would not follow the king of New York.
I saw a video of this woman and she’s off beat. I also saw her tweet that she loved the apprentice which is weird.
The tragedy of these types of crimes is that it is so hard to protect victims and the falsely accused. Because there is rarely much evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deplorables are amazing. Didn’t see “it’s impossible for anyone to ever have been sexually assaulted in a department store dressing room” as something that any person would ever claim.
+1
A very true statement.