Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
How many 20 somethings earn $174,000 per year? Of those that do, how many live in run-down walk-up flats?
In other words, she's using politics for personal financial gain.
Fine by me, but I notice a little tiny disconnect with her political platform.
- Lawyers for the Coolidge Reagan Foundation, a conservative non-profit, filed an FEC complaint against Cortez's campaign team on Wednesday
- The group wants the feds to review recently-unveiled campaign expenditures Cortez's election staff made to Brand New Congress LLC
- The political consulting firm hired Cortez's boyfriend, Riley Roberts, as a marketing strategist back in 2017 in the early stages of her campaign
- Cortez's campaign paid $6,191.32 to BNC not long before the PAC made two separate payments to Roberts totaling $6,000
- BNC Communications Director Zeynab Day said his firm hired Roberts based on his experience managing successful advertising and social media campaigns
Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
+1.
You idiots couldn’t find the navy yard on google maps, eh?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
+1.
Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
How many 20 somethings earn $174,000 per year? Of those that do, how many live in run-down walk-up flats?
In other words, she's using politics for personal financial gain.
Fine by me, but I notice a little tiny disconnect with her political platform.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AOC has already had untold number of death threats against her. Very few buildings could handle her security needs.
If this psychotic thread is any indication, I think we can figure out who is making the threats.
#smollett
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
How many 20 somethings earn $174,000 per year? Of those that do, how many live in run-down walk-up flats?
In other words, she's using politics for personal financial gain.
Fine by me, but I notice a little tiny disconnect with her political platform.
Anonymous wrote:AOC has already had untold number of death threats against her. Very few buildings could handle her security needs.
If this psychotic thread is any indication, I think we can figure out who is making the threats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
How many 20 somethings earn $174,000 per year? Of those that do, how many live in run-down walk-up flats?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).
+1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Luxury" is marketing speak. I'm sure the place is no Trump Tower.
This is a really pointless thread and I am baffled how it has gone on for dozens of pages.
In the context of her age, 20-something, it is a luxury apartment. Anyone denying that is being a partisan bootlicker. I fully agree she's clever, she's a natural politician ... but she is a vain phony and a pathological liar with a thirst for power (just like literally all of her politico peers).