Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the GOP statements of "this is very disturbing" OR "I find this troubling." All I hear are crickets.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/341460-graham-trump-jr-emails-disturbing-and-very-problematic
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-another-shoe-needs-to-be-pursued
Where are the GOP actual actions?
GOP has no political points to gain by taking action. It'll just detract them from the healthcare bill agenda that is on deck.
At this point, the GOP NEEDS to detract from the healthcare bill. Wildly unpopular, even among the GOP, and going nowhere. They should be eager to change the subject.
They might be grateful to change the subject from Russia to the health care bill...?
Anonymous wrote:still a nothing burger. at most just a slice of lettuce in it. pass!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This family is seriously made of Teflon.
In business, yes. A whole lot on money to spend on lawyers will do that. But government doesn't works that way. Money still talks. But, in government, you can't just do whatever the f--k pops into your head, and write a check if things go badly.
Anonymous wrote:Odd timing to do this announcement during Dad's big trip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need a DCUM prediction: when do we get thee Trump tweet about how. Donny was right and this is HRC and Obama's fault (because emails or Benghazi or a crime having to do with Russia that has never been shown?). This afternoon? Tomorrow am's toilet time? Or does he STFU and stay off Twitter. (That last one is a joke. We all know the tweet is coming...).
So, DCUM, place your bets now on tTrump tweet time. I say 6:30 tomorrow am. Needs some time to watch Fox and Friends.
Actually, I wonder...do you think Putin is currently creating some kind of incriminating evidence against Hillary to show that there's some truth to the story?
It doesn't matter. Even if it is proven that HRC did whatever in the library with the candlestick, takinnga meeting with a foreign government Rep to get this info is still a crime. "But HRC was guilty" is not a defense. She could end up with her own legal problems if she did something wrong. But it does not get Uday (I like that, but then who is Jared?) out of this clusterf*ck.
Which crime? Taking for money is prohibited by election laws, but what crime is it to take info?
The crime is soliciting or accepting something of value. The law is not just about actual cash.
There is no indication of solicitation. Even under the broad definition of "solicitation" propounded by the FEC. What was accepted?
I am sure there are plenty of other crimes committed elsewhere, like failing to disclose this meeting in the first place. The prohibition on private diplomacy. Etc. But hearing about proffered information? that apparently never materialized . . . .
At least one expert disagrees with your analysis:
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=93740
Your expert got ahead of him/herself. In the article the author notes that a "solicitation" means to ask or request. Then they specifically go on to note that the information was offered. Offer and ask are not synonyms.
But the facts have now changed. The Russian lawyer says Trump approached them with the request. So I call and raise you one.
Anonymous wrote:This family is seriously made of Teflon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the GOP statements of "this is very disturbing" OR "I find this troubling." All I hear are crickets.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/341460-graham-trump-jr-emails-disturbing-and-very-problematic
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-another-shoe-needs-to-be-pursued
Where are the GOP actual actions?
GOP has no political points to gain by taking action. It'll just detract them from the healthcare bill agenda that is on deck.
At this point, the GOP NEEDS to detract from the healthcare bill. Wildly unpopular, even among the GOP, and going nowhere. They should be eager to change the subject.
Anonymous wrote:This family is seriously made of Teflon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the GOP statements of "this is very disturbing" OR "I find this troubling." All I hear are crickets.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/341460-graham-trump-jr-emails-disturbing-and-very-problematic
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-another-shoe-needs-to-be-pursued
Where are the GOP actual actions?
GOP has no political points to gain by taking action. It'll just detract them from the healthcare bill agenda that is on deck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Need a DCUM prediction: when do we get thee Trump tweet about how. Donny was right and this is HRC and Obama's fault (because emails or Benghazi or a crime having to do with Russia that has never been shown?). This afternoon? Tomorrow am's toilet time? Or does he STFU and stay off Twitter. (That last one is a joke. We all know the tweet is coming...).
So, DCUM, place your bets now on tTrump tweet time. I say 6:30 tomorrow am. Needs some time to watch Fox and Friends.
Actually, I wonder...do you think Putin is currently creating some kind of incriminating evidence against Hillary to show that there's some truth to the story?
It doesn't matter. Even if it is proven that HRC did whatever in the library with the candlestick, takinnga meeting with a foreign government Rep to get this info is still a crime. "But HRC was guilty" is not a defense. She could end up with her own legal problems if she did something wrong. But it does not get Uday (I like that, but then who is Jared?) out of this clusterf*ck.
Which crime? Taking for money is prohibited by election laws, but what crime is it to take info?
The crime is soliciting or accepting something of value. The law is not just about actual cash.
There is no indication of solicitation. Even under the broad definition of "solicitation" propounded by the FEC. What was accepted?
I am sure there are plenty of other crimes committed elsewhere, like failing to disclose this meeting in the first place. The prohibition on private diplomacy. Etc. But hearing about proffered information? that apparently never materialized . . . .
At least one expert disagrees with your analysis:
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=93740
Your expert got ahead of him/herself. In the article the author notes that a "solicitation" means to ask or request. Then they specifically go on to note that the information was offered. Offer and ask are not synonyms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the GOP statements of "this is very disturbing" OR "I find this troubling." All I hear are crickets.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/341460-graham-trump-jr-emails-disturbing-and-very-problematic
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-another-shoe-needs-to-be-pursued
Where are the GOP actual actions?
PP only asked about statements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the GOP statements of "this is very disturbing" OR "I find this troubling." All I hear are crickets.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/341460-graham-trump-jr-emails-disturbing-and-very-problematic
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-another-shoe-needs-to-be-pursued
Where are the GOP actual actions?