Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing that CMI is facing growing pains that all other charters have faced. I'll admit from experience, it is hard to voice concerns without being seen as a naysayer/soon to lottery parent. MV has seen it on discipline issues. TR4 has seen it with their PP react. TRY has seen with teaching changes. ITS has seen with older grade/potty issues. YY has faced with heritage/trying to be private. Stokes has faced with "are they from Maryland". When you are at a small and/or growing school, there's a very fine line between raising concerns and looking like a PITA parent.
We older grade at ITS, what's wrong with us? We love it.
How many ITS teachers left last year? All of them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing that CMI is facing growing pains that all other charters have faced. I'll admit from experience, it is hard to voice concerns without being seen as a naysayer/soon to lottery parent. MV has seen it on discipline issues. TR4 has seen it with their PP react. TRY has seen with teaching changes. ITS has seen with older grade/potty issues. YY has faced with heritage/trying to be private. Stokes has faced with "are they from Maryland". When you are at a small and/or growing school, there's a very fine line between raising concerns and looking like a PITA parent.
We older grade at ITS, what's wrong with us? We love it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing that CMI is facing growing pains that all other charters have faced. I'll admit from experience, it is hard to voice concerns without being seen as a naysayer/soon to lottery parent. MV has seen it on discipline issues. TR4 has seen it with their PP react. TRY has seen with teaching changes. ITS has seen with older grade/potty issues. YY has faced with heritage/trying to be private. Stokes has faced with "are they from Maryland". When you are at a small and/or growing school, there's a very fine line between raising concerns and looking like a PITA parent.
We older grade at ITS, what's wrong with us? We love it.
Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing that CMI is facing growing pains that all other charters have faced. I'll admit from experience, it is hard to voice concerns without being seen as a naysayer/soon to lottery parent. MV has seen it on discipline issues. TR4 has seen it with their PP react. TRY has seen with teaching changes. ITS has seen with older grade/potty issues. YY has faced with heritage/trying to be private. Stokes has faced with "are they from Maryland". When you are at a small and/or growing school, there's a very fine line between raising concerns and looking like a PITA parent.
Anonymous wrote:Wow - CMI must be a heck of a place if it can turn TWO general threads into CMI specific only.
Anonymous wrote:Wow - CMI must be a heck of a place if it can turn TWO general threads into CMI specific only.
Anonymous wrote:Former CMI parent here, upper grade. Last year admin definitely promised
to use textbooks in Middle School and to somehow teach organizing skills,
executive function skills. Actually they promised to do everything at once,
hopefully they'll manage to sort something out, and at least foster a pleasant
classroom "culture" which seemed to be a real priority. Good luck pressing
for more content, hope it works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I think Bridge's preference is only for kids with more significant special needs (as measured by hours of services in their IEPs). If CMI's SN kids get an hour of OT a week and preferential seating, and Bridge's kids need 1:1 aides, assistive communications devices, and PT daily then even having a smaller % of SN kids could still require a lot more effort and money.
How do they ensure that with a lottery? What if they get kids who need more?
Anonymous wrote:But I think Bridge's preference is only for kids with more significant special needs (as measured by hours of services in their IEPs). If CMI's SN kids get an hour of OT a week and preferential seating, and Bridge's kids need 1:1 aides, assistive communications devices, and PT daily then even having a smaller % of SN kids could still require a lot more effort and money.