Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If every life mattered they would have cancelled the rally due to the storm. Instead there are bus loads of people stranded on the turnpike in Pennsylvania.

Truth. http://mashable.com/2016/01/23/pennsylvania-turnpike-drivers-stuck-snow/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

+1,000,000

The right has, for decades, twisted this issue in the direction that allows them to feel morally superior all the while avoiding doing any real work in service of the women at the heart of the matter. You've got skills!

Do you support free contraception in schools? Have you adopted an unwanted child? How many impoverished, abused, neglected, unwanted children do you support with your time? Do you even think about the children born into lives of hell once they've left the womb? No. You don't.

It is your actions that are irresponsible and immoral.

+1000

People are more than willing to take responsibility when they have easy means of doing so. Take the Colorado experiment where they made it easier for teens to get free contraceptives. Huge reduction in teen pregnancies and a massive 42% reduction in abortions. That PROVES that liberal polices WORK. Conservative policies on the other hand only end up hurting people and making it harder. In fact, it's proof that backassward, shortsighted, uninformed conservative policies actually INCREASE the numbers of women seeking abortions.

Even though the left has tried to normalize abortion, with the #shoutyourabortion campaign, or with trying to paint the million of women and men who don't support abortion on demand in all cases as waging a "war on women," the good news is that the public isn't buying it. The number of abortions in America keeps falling, and Gallup polls show that most Americans support restrictions on when an abortion can be performed.

Even Nancy Pelosi, the pro-choice liberal feminist, has publicly stated that she doesn't support abortion on demand, and said that "I don’t believe that abortion is a form of birth control or contraception." http://blogs.rollcall.com/news/pelosi-im-not-for-abortion-on-demand/

Is Nancy Pelosi fighting the "war on women" too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Some stages of human development include:

Infant
Toddler
Adolescent
And yes, fetus is a stage of development.

You do realize that all mammals have a fetus stage right? So at that stage it could be a rat, a giraffe, a kangaroo, a donkey, a dog, a cat, a platypus, a ...................

In short, fetus != human.

you 2 forgot embryo. It has the potential to form into a human after it stops relying on its host for food and nutrients.

You think "it" transforms into a human the day the OB delivers?

Stupidity at its finest.

It's called rationalization. Or perhaps complete ignorance of biology.

"Ignorance" is setting up the strawman that anyone has an abortion in the third trimester for anything other than the most devastating reasons. Ghouls.

I don't know who you are talking to, but I am the person who posted just before you. I have family members who have been in that situation (late abortion for devastating reasons). I am thankful they had the option available when they needed it. But what was lost was their baby, a human being, and we mourned and still mourn the loss of that child. Don't fucking tell me it wasn't a human being or a baby just because it was still in the womb. I also lost a pregnancy. I mourned that baby, as well. Fuck you if you are going to tell me that wasn't my baby or call it a parasite. Abortion is not something to be taken lightly, even by those of us that believe it needs to be available.

I wish we would all work harder to ensure adequate education, adequate access to effective birth contol, etc. that would prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place.

I didn't "fucking tell" you anything of the sort, so I guess fuck you, too? I didn't say it wasn't a baby, I didn't call it a parasite - you're having an argument entirely in your own head there. I say again, clearer, so maybe you needn't say "fuck you" without cause again - the anti-choice side pretends that women have third trimester abortions all the time. In no world do they.

The fuck you is to everyone on this thread dismissing babies in the womb as non-babies or non-humans. It's just bizarre and weird to claim that.

Why did you insert something about third trimester abortions into an exchange about terminology? You were totally off topic.

Histrionic much, PP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

So you haven't adopted any children? Then STFU.

Why is there a requirement for adoption if one believes every child should be wanted? If every child is wanted, there would be no need for Wednesday's child.

Unfortunately for your peanut brain to comprehend, every child is not wanted. You can't force people to want a child, or their child. And for many reasons you have so many neglected, forgotten, or abused children who many grow up to become scary adults. I do believe that children are precious and should be protected. But, I live by my actions and not just sprout words

Signed,A fertile woman who has adopted an older child who believes that a woman has a right to make her own reproductive choices, including abortion.

Anonymous wrote:If every life mattered they would have cancelled the rally due to the storm. Instead there are bus loads of people stranded on the turnpike in Pennsylvania.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
EVERY life matters.

And every sperm is sacred.

[every sperm cell is alive, and thus "a life" - SO DON'T WASTE IT, IT'S FOR PROCREATING ONLY]

What religion are you, if that's your faith?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

+1,000,000

The right has, for decades, twisted this issue in the direction that allows them to feel morally superior all the while avoiding doing any real work in service of the women at the heart of the matter. You've got skills!

Do you support free contraception in schools? Have you adopted an unwanted child? How many impoverished, abused, neglected, unwanted children do you support with your time? Do you even think about the children born into lives of hell once they've left the womb? No. You don't.

It is your actions that are irresponsible and immoral.

+1000

People are more than willing to take responsibility when they have easy means of doing so. Take the Colorado experiment where they made it easier for teens to get free contraceptives. Huge reduction in teen pregnancies and a massive 42% reduction in abortions. That PROVES that liberal polices WORK. Conservative policies on the other hand only end up hurting people and making it harder. In fact, it's proof that backassward, shortsighted, uninformed conservative policies actually INCREASE the numbers of women seeking abortions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Some stages of human development include:

Infant
Toddler
Adolescent
And yes, fetus is a stage of development.

You do realize that all mammals have a fetus stage right? So at that stage it could be a rat, a giraffe, a kangaroo, a donkey, a dog, a cat, a platypus, a ...................

In short, fetus != human.

you 2 forgot embryo. It has the potential to form into a human after it stops relying on its host for food and nutrients.

You think "it" transforms into a human the day the OB delivers?

Stupidity at its finest.

It's called rationalization. Or perhaps complete ignorance of biology.

"Ignorance" is setting up the strawman that anyone has an abortion in the third trimester for anything other than the most devastating reasons. Ghouls.

I don't know who you are talking to, but I am the person who posted just before you. I have family members who have been in that situation (late abortion for devastating reasons). I am thankful they had the option available when they needed it. But what was lost was their baby, a human being, and we mourned and still mourn the loss of that child. Don't fucking tell me it wasn't a human being or a baby just because it was still in the womb. I also lost a pregnancy. I mourned that baby, as well. Fuck you if you are going to tell me that wasn't my baby or call it a parasite. Abortion is not something to be taken lightly, even by those of us that believe it needs to be available.

I wish we would all work harder to ensure adequate education, adequate access to effective birth contol, etc. that would prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place.

I didn't "fucking tell" you anything of the sort, so I guess fuck you, too? I didn't say it wasn't a baby, I didn't call it a parasite - you're having an argument entirely in your own head there. I say again, clearer, so maybe you needn't say "fuck you" without cause again - the anti-choice side pretends that women have third trimester abortions all the time. In no world do they.

The fuck you is to everyone on this thread dismissing babies in the womb as non-babies or non-humans. It's just bizarre and weird to claim that.

Why did you insert something about third trimester abortions into an exchange about terminology? You were totally off topic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

So you haven't adopted any children? Then STFU.

Why is there a requirement for adoption if one believes every child should be wanted? If every child is wanted, there would be no need for Wednesday's child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

I don't know. It was a simple question PP asked. How many of these children hveyou adopted. Somebody upstream stated that there were infertile couples desperate to adopt and become parents. Wednesday child is desperate to place children with loving parents. What's the problem?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.