Anonymous
Post 05/13/2016 17:02     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
If Dany and Jon are related they really can't have a romance, can they?
Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:50     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I thought last night's episode was slow. Other than Jon, the Ned Stark flashback, and Rickon FINALLY coming back nothing else really happened. Tyrion is seriously wasting away in Meereen. Boooooring.


That's all? Three major plot developments? You poor, poor thing



You're crazy--I thought it was over way too quickly! Literally thought it was 30 minutes instead of the hour--I was hungry for more.


Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:32     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.


I have been reading up on this theory as well, I really like it- the whole "the north remembers" storyline could be really awesome this season but it might be too hopeful- no matter what that wolf head was way too small to be a Shaggy Dog, I would love for that to be intentional instead of an oversight!


Or was that really Rickon's head, Rickon having warged into Shaggy Dog? And now "Rickon" is going to bite Ramsey and give him rabies!! Stay tuned.


This made me chuckle though it sounds a bit like the Hodor / Wyllis theory.
Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:05     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.


I have been reading up on this theory as well, I really like it- the whole "the north remembers" storyline could be really awesome this season but it might be too hopeful- no matter what that wolf head was way too small to be a Shaggy Dog, I would love for that to be intentional instead of an oversight!


Or was that really Rickon's head, Rickon having warged into Shaggy Dog? And now "Rickon" is going to bite Ramsey and give him rabies!! Stay tuned.
Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:02     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:OK something DH and I couldn't figure out- why was it such a big deal that Eddard Stark didn't kill that swordsman at the tower like the stories said? It was a fight to the death, who cares if the other guy stabbed him in the back??


Other guy? That was Howland Reed, Meera's (supposed) father. (Or is she really Jon's twin sister ...?) Ned was willing to lie to protect Howland's reputation, which he was also willing to do to protect Jon from the wrath of the Baratheons. Remember how Ned objected to killing Dany in Season 1?

Too. Many. Layers. AHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhh .......... .

Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:00     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.


I hope you are correct. I'm with the earlier PP and don't want any more dead Stark direwolves.

Maybe Nymeria will come home and eat Ramsey.


I would be happy beyond belief to see that happen.
Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 14:00     Subject: Game of Thrones
Upcoming episode titles.

4. Book of the Stranger

(I guess something regarding The Seven...does each of the seven gods have his or her own book?)



5. The Door

(Dany's red door? The door to the Tower Ned was at? Ho-Door?)



6. Blood of My Blood

(That's from the oath that bloodriders give to their leader/khal...hmm...)


7. The Broken Man

(Ian McShane alert!!!!)

Anonymous
Post 05/10/2016 13:53     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.


I have been reading up on this theory as well, I really like it- the whole "the north remembers" storyline could be really awesome this season but it might be too hopeful- no matter what that wolf head was way too small to be a Shaggy Dog, I would love for that to be intentional instead of an oversight!
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 20:31     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love Tyrion too. I do wonder what it's like for him to play a dwarf on a show where he gets made fun of and gets a lot of cruel jokes his way due to his height. It takes a strong person to play a role like that.


I think he loves it. I can't think of any other well rounded roles for little people, (Warwick Davis in Willow perhaps). This character is a complex 3 dimensional character. Any actor would be thrilled to have a part like Tyrion. I'm sure Peter Dinklage is thrilled to have the role. The fact that his character is made fun of is much less demeaning that playing a "cute" munchkin. It's a part. Sometimes actors play ugly people, mean people, and even Hitler.

Its the crowning achievement of his career. He is thrilled out of his mind about it -- interview the NYT.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 19:16     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.


I hope you are correct. I'm with the earlier PP and don't want any more dead Stark direwolves.

Maybe Nymeria will come home and eat Ramsey.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 15:44     Subject: Re:Game of Thrones
This is from a Time article. Lots are thinking there is no way that was ShaggyDog...

However, while the moment was an upsetting one, some are speculating that the wolf head did not actually belong to Shaggydog and that the Umbers’ show of loyalty was part of a larger conspiracy to overthrow Ramsay as Warden of the North.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 14:59     Subject: Game of Thrones
Yeah I feel like they just "touched" on a lot of really important threads, and then boom, done. I feel like this though was more of a "building" episode where you get a lot of information on a lot of storylines, but next week you get more action.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 12:24     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I thought last night's episode was slow. Other than Jon, the Ned Stark flashback, and Rickon FINALLY coming back nothing else really happened. Tyrion is seriously wasting away in Meereen. Boooooring.


That's all? Three major plot developments? You poor, poor thing



You're crazy--I thought it was over way too quickly! Literally thought it was 30 minutes instead of the hour--I was hungry for more.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 12:22     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OK something DH and I couldn't figure out- why was it such a big deal that Eddard Stark didn't kill that swordsman at the tower like the stories said? It was a fight to the death, who cares if the other guy stabbed him in the back??


That section was just a small part of this bigger story, that everyone has heard for years, but based on all the side eye and strange looks whenever someone brings up Lyanna and Rheagar, you can tell didn't happen the way. The fight with Arthur Dane is important cause Bran sees that what he was told was not the truth, but why? We will see more of this vision as the season progresses and the whole thing is going to unravel- hopefully all to reveal the very popular fan theory that Lyanna and Rheagar were in love and secretly married and had a boy, named Jon....


I agree that it's odd, and against Ned's character, to lie and say you killed someone when someone else did it, and saved your life. In the books he was upfront and didn't lie about how it went down. Anyway, I think PP is correct--it's to show Bran that not all of what he was told by Ned is the truth. EG, that Lyanna was "abducted" rather than eloped with Rheagar, and that Jon Snow is their love child, whom Ned promised to protect and raise as his own, as Lyanna lay dying.
Anonymous
Post 05/09/2016 12:17     Subject: Game of Thrones
Anonymous wrote:OK something DH and I couldn't figure out- why was it such a big deal that Eddard Stark didn't kill that swordsman at the tower like the stories said? It was a fight to the death, who cares if the other guy stabbed him in the back??


That section was just a small part of this bigger story, that everyone has heard for years, but based on all the side eye and strange looks whenever someone brings up Lyanna and Rheagar, you can tell didn't happen the way. The fight with Arthur Dane is important cause Bran sees that what he was told was not the truth, but why? We will see more of this vision as the season progresses and the whole thing is going to unravel- hopefully all to reveal the very popular fan theory that Lyanna and Rheagar were in love and secretly married and had a boy, named Jon....