Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Kash Patel?

They say the shooter shouted something before the attack? What was it?

The weapons was unusual? How?

It's amazing that Kash hasn't leaked any details before they are cleared for release to the public. And no pics of him standing around in a borrowed FBI jacket pretending to be in charge.

At least we know it's a male in all black clothing with a mask and carrying a gun.

That’s pretty much the standard maga uniform.

So I think we can draw some conclusions now.

Trump will pardon him. Just like the Jan 6ers

I mean he carried out the attack on the Ivies that Trump has been pushing all year.

One of the victims* comes from Trumpland, so that will muddy the waters.

(no, not yet publicly identified)

Anonymous wrote:It is so stupid that this is still happening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 150 people in a dark gym for over 12 hours
Talk about trauma.

The UVA students were on lockdown for 12 hours so this isn’t new.

Can you say a little more about why you posted this?

Exactly. Why?

To illustrate that school shootings and long lockdowns are not a one-off in the US, particularly when the shooter doesn't commit suicide or get shot by police.

But they are much much more common. This is stupid.

This is like the anti seatbelt morons back in the day. BUT SOMEONE ONE DIES WHILE WEARINF A SEATBELT, SEE THEM THAR SEATBEKTS DINT WERK!

The backlash to this is going to end up being a repeal on the 2nd because these children in the GOP couldn’t stop with the gun lobby money for 5 seconds.

Which is exactly why I’ve come to accept and somewhat tolerate these shootings, because what I want more than anything is to abolish the second amendment.

At the risk of sounding callous and cruel, I hope these shootings continue on right up until we as a culture decide to eliminate gun owning. Because if shootings become less frequent over time, we will lose a lot of the public sentiment and inertia we’ve built up to banning guns. So as perverse as it sounds, if you’re someone who wants to get rid of guns, you need to embrace these shootings as a necessary evil. The end goal is what’s important. No great movement in history is achieved without pain. The civil rights struggle and LGBTQIA rights struggle are the most recent examples. People died to achieve those victories, and ending gun ownership is no different. Unfortunately more people will need to die to achieve that goal.

Thanks for letting us know that you want more people to die in order to support your most cherished political positions.

I’m guessing though that you and your family are not among the ones you’re willing to sacrifice to achieve your “victory.”

Because nothing worthwhile is achieved without sacrifice, unfortunately. I can tell you're very emotional about this, and that’s understandable. But you need to be more pragmatic in your outlook.

If civil rights protesters in Selma weren’t willing to be lynched and murdered, we would still be living under Jim Crow. If LGBTQIA persons hadn’t rioted at Stonewall, we’d still be living in world without rights. Every great societal shift requires a cost of lives. This is no different. These shootings unfortunately must continue in order to achieve the goal of a society without guns.

Are you sacrificing your child?

This is a very dumb argument at best.

But really, it’s specious and the actual definition of straw-man.

Anonymous wrote:It is so stupid that this is still happening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 150 people in a dark gym for over 12 hours
Talk about trauma.

The UVA students were on lockdown for 12 hours so this isn’t new.

Can you say a little more about why you posted this?

Exactly. Why?

To illustrate that school shootings and long lockdowns are not a one-off in the US, particularly when the shooter doesn't commit suicide or get shot by police.

But they are much much more common. This is stupid.

This is like the anti seatbelt morons back in the day. BUT SOMEONE ONE DIES WHILE WEARINF A SEATBELT, SEE THEM THAR SEATBEKTS DINT WERK!

The backlash to this is going to end up being a repeal on the 2nd because these children in the GOP couldn’t stop with the gun lobby money for 5 seconds.

Which is exactly why I’ve come to accept and somewhat tolerate these shootings, because what I want more than anything is to abolish the second amendment.

At the risk of sounding callous and cruel, I hope these shootings continue on right up until we as a culture decide to eliminate gun owning. Because if shootings become less frequent over time, we will lose a lot of the public sentiment and inertia we’ve built up to banning guns. So as perverse as it sounds, if you’re someone who wants to get rid of guns, you need to embrace these shootings as a necessary evil. The end goal is what’s important. No great movement in history is achieved without pain. The civil rights struggle and LGBTQIA rights struggle are the most recent examples. People died to achieve those victories, and ending gun ownership is no different. Unfortunately more people will need to die to achieve that goal.

Thanks for letting us know that you want more people to die in order to support your most cherished political positions.

I’m guessing though that you and your family are not among the ones you’re willing to sacrifice to achieve your “victory.”

Because nothing worthwhile is achieved without sacrifice, unfortunately. I can tell you're very emotional about this, and that’s understandable. But you need to be more pragmatic in your outlook.

If civil rights protesters in Selma weren’t willing to be lynched and murdered, we would still be living under Jim Crow. If LGBTQIA persons hadn’t rioted at Stonewall, we’d still be living in world without rights. Every great societal shift requires a cost of lives. This is no different. These shootings unfortunately must continue in order to achieve the goal of a society without guns.

Are you sacrificing your child?

If it happens, I would take solace in knowing they died to achieve a greater good for society.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CNN is reporting that the shooter was in his 30s.

If that's true, I am at a loss to speculate about a motive in this situation.

Someone on this thread said a professor connected to the economics class was Jewish ... but, if that's what you're going to do, in my memory there is a still very serious orthodox Jewish community right up the road only a few miles away, complete with synagogue and Hebrew school.

I don't think they've moved since I was there, even if it was 30 years ago.

I agree with the speculation that the shooter must be white, since they're so far saying nothing about race.

Maybe hate all liberals and smart people or something? Brown is well known to be one of the most liberal Ivies? Last time I checked?

The motive is clear and has been clear since last night. This was a study session for an Econ class taught by a proud Jewish professor. This anti-Semitic Hamas supporter walked in excited to get his chance to support the cause and murder a wonderful, innocent, and proud Jewish woman, and freaked out when it was her TA leading the session. Decided that murdering her students also benefited the cause.

Of course, the cops refuse to do their job and acknowledge what is actually going on, because if they acknowledge this hatred, they can no longer pretend that use Jews are just getting whiney and uppity when we say that we are terrified of leaving our houses, and they would have to admit that the Democratic Party has become an international arm of Hamas, a terrorist organization, so I’m sure they are desperately trying to find some way to tie it to something- anything - other then anti-semitism. Preferably our great president Donald J. Trump.

I repeat my previous post … there’s literally a whole Jewish community up the hill.

I used to work out at the JCC

Using the phrase “the Democratic Party” marks you as a foreigner … no one in the actual US uses this term

Hamas terrorists are not exactly known for their intelligence. And the anti-Semitic monster likely intended to target the nearby community following the attack.

And I call it the Democratic Party because I want democrats/Hamas supporters to have to wrestle with the root of their party as they continue to call for my brutal murder, and the murder of the Jewish population. They need to recognize how far the party has fallen from from advancing democracy to openly calling for the extermination of the Jewish population.

The Democratic Party does not "support" Hamas. If you want people to stop conflating Netanyahu and Israeli war crimes with Jewish people globally, then stop trying to conflate concern for Palenstinian people as "supporting Hamas."

Anonymous wrote:Brown University banned guns. Rhode Island has some of the strictest gun control in the nation (AWB, mag restriction, et al). Why didn’t the laws dcum and the radical left support, the laws that make innocents completely defenseless, work?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Kash Patel?

They say the shooter shouted something before the attack? What was it?

The weapons was unusual? How?

Banging his girlfriend on a government jet most likely.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Over 150 people in a dark gym for over 12 hours
Talk about trauma.

The UVA students were on lockdown for 12 hours so this isn’t new.

Can you say a little more about why you posted this?

Exactly. Why?

To illustrate that school shootings and long lockdowns are not a one-off in the US, particularly when the shooter doesn't commit suicide or get shot by police.

But they are much much more common. This is stupid.

This is like the anti seatbelt morons back in the day. BUT SOMEONE ONE DIES WHILE WEARINF A SEATBELT, SEE THEM THAR SEATBEKTS DINT WERK!

The backlash to this is going to end up being a repeal on the 2nd because these children in the GOP couldn’t stop with the gun lobby money for 5 seconds.

Which is exactly why I’ve come to accept and somewhat tolerate these shootings, because what I want more than anything is to abolish the second amendment.

At the risk of sounding callous and cruel, I hope these shootings continue on right up until we as a culture decide to eliminate gun owning. Because if shootings become less frequent over time, we will lose a lot of the public sentiment and inertia we’ve built up to banning guns. So as perverse as it sounds, if you’re someone who wants to get rid of guns, you need to embrace these shootings as a necessary evil. The end goal is what’s important. No great movement in history is achieved without pain. The civil rights struggle and LGBTQIA rights struggle are the most recent examples. People died to achieve those victories, and ending gun ownership is no different. Unfortunately more people will need to die to achieve that goal.

Thanks for letting us know that you want more people to die in order to support your most cherished political positions.

I’m guessing though that you and your family are not among the ones you’re willing to sacrifice to achieve your “victory.”

Because nothing worthwhile is achieved without sacrifice, unfortunately. I can tell you're very emotional about this, and that’s understandable. But you need to be more pragmatic in your outlook.

If civil rights protesters in Selma weren’t willing to be lynched and murdered, we would still be living under Jim Crow. If LGBTQIA persons hadn’t rioted at Stonewall, we’d still be living in world without rights. Every great societal shift requires a cost of lives. This is no different. These shootings unfortunately must continue in order to achieve the goal of a society without guns.

Thanks for educating us from the safety of your parents’ basement. From that safe haven, you can sit cool, calm, and collected, studying the situation “pragmatically.”

Let me guess - once we’ve disarmed the great unwashed citizenry, it will still be ok to have an armed to the teeth government, led of course by Democrats?

Your thoughts come to screen as the rantings of teenager.

And yes, nothing would be better for this country than to have imbeciles like your disarmed for the safety of all of us. Because you sound exactly like the sort of person who commits these shootings.

And yes, again - the police and military are the only ones who should be armed, ever. And a representative government entirely composed of elected Democrats would be the best possible solution for fixing this mess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brown University banned guns. Rhode Island has some of the strictest gun control in the nation (AWB, mag restriction, et al). Why didn’t the laws dcum and the radical left support, the laws that make innocents completely defenseless, work?

Because no one checks the transport of goods as we drive across borders and it’s stupid easy to get a gun from Alabama where you can buy a gun easier than a snicker’s bar and drive it up to Rhode Island.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Kash Patel?

They say the shooter shouted something before the attack? What was it?

The weapons was unusual? How?

It's amazing that Kash hasn't leaked any details before they are cleared for release to the public. And no pics of him standing around in a borrowed FBI jacket pretending to be in charge.

At least we know it's a male in all black clothing with a mask and carrying a gun.

That’s pretty much the standard maga uniform.

So I think we can draw some conclusions now.

Trump will pardon him. Just like the Jan 6ers

I mean he carried out the attack on the Ivies that Trump has been pushing all year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Kash Patel?

They say the shooter shouted something before the attack? What was it?

The weapons was unusual? How?

It's amazing that Kash hasn't leaked any details before they are cleared for release to the public. And no pics of him standing around in a borrowed FBI jacket pretending to be in charge.

At least we know it's a male in all black clothing with a mask and carrying a gun.

That’s pretty much the standard maga uniform.

So I think we can draw some conclusions now.

Trump will pardon him. Just like the Jan 6ers

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Kash Patel?

They say the shooter shouted something before the attack? What was it?

The weapons was unusual? How?

It's amazing that Kash hasn't leaked any details before they are cleared for release to the public. And no pics of him standing around in a borrowed FBI jacket pretending to be in charge.

At least we know it's a male in all black clothing with a mask and carrying a gun.

That’s pretty much the standard maga uniform.

So I think we can draw some conclusions now.

Anonymous wrote:Brown University banned guns. Rhode Island has some of the strictest gun control in the nation (AWB, mag restriction, et al). Why didn’t the laws dcum and the radical left support, the laws that make innocents completely defenseless, work?