Well it looked like the leak might work...

Republicans are bracing for a significant chunk of the conference to vote for Rep. Ro Khanna’s (D-Calif.) and Rep. Thomas Massie’s (R-Ky.) Epstein file disclosure bill once it lands on the House floor.

Republicans expecting mass defections on Epstein vote
Senior Republicans privately believe dozens of Republicans will vote for it, possibly 100 or more, according to five people granted anonymity to speak candidly. Democrats pushing the petition publicly predicted that Republicans would rush to support the measure once it hit the floor.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/12/congress/house-epstein-vote-gop-defections-00649624

I hope they're right.

Let's have a vote to release the redacted name, and see who objects.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mike Johnson is part of this.

I think SCJ Roberts is too. It’s the only thing that explains his willingness to trash the constitution.

Is ACB supporting him with votes?

ACB has become very uncomfortable discovering her role as Useful Idiot that she got because she actually believed in the Catholic myths that the rest of the Republicans only use to keep evil men in power.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:What happened to the discharge petition?
I was told on here that Grijalva wasn't being sworn in because she was the 218th signature.

Do you ever watch the news?

Try to keep up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House responded and said the girl mentioned is Virginia Giuffre who stated Trump never did anything with her.

I still smell a rat.

Release the files.

We all know he wa not playing chess and was it Virginia, or….Another Victim?!

It was another victim. Virginia was 29 when this event allegedly took place.

The email does not give a date for the alleged "event."

The date of the email is 2012 and Giuffre
left Epstein in 2002.

You don’t understand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Epstein files do not matter. Trump's supporters elected a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who willfully defies the constitution and courts. There is nothing in these letters that will cause him to lose support among his base and Republicans in congress. Trump said he could shoot someone in broad daylight and get away with it, and he is right.

I don’t know, you don’t need them all. You just need a few republicans in office that might still have a soul or a conscience.

I will say that that if you see people you know, or in the general public in your sphere, supporting Trump at this point it would probably be best to keep them far away from your children.

It is only a matter of time before no one will be willing to admit they voted for this man.

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Anonymous wrote:What happened to the discharge petition?
I was told on here that Grijalva wasn't being sworn in because she was the 218th signature.

it is complete. Johnson said he will have a vote on it next week. Then it goes to the Senate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Epstein was in Trump Tower AFTER the 2016 election.

Why would he be in Trump Tower if Trump had declared him persona non grata years earlier?

But this is not surprising. The only surprising thing is why Trump cares.

IT takes a dump on the WH narrative that Trump disassociated himself from Epstein in 2007, doesn't it?

I think Trump is a lying skeezebag, but being in a Trump tower doesn't mean anything

We have the date of the email. Maybe that was one of those days Trump was there. Start getting testimony from doormen, SS agents, housekeepers, etc.

It is a gigantic NYC skyscraper building with various offices, condos, retail, it's like saying he was at Rockefeller plaza and assuming he was meeting Rockefeller himself.

I hate Trump, but this one doesn't mean anything.

Not really. Most people don’t give a specific location when they’re asked what city they’re in. He’d have said “New York” in contrast to Paris. So he’s referencing a specific location on purpose, ie to signify potential meeting, or at least being in the vicinity of, Trump.

Disagree.

-a New Yorker

Really? Someone asks if you’re still in Paris and you respond “no I’m standing on 44th and Broadway?”

Any normal person would respond “no I’m in New York” - unless they’re trying to draw attention to a specific place or person. Like saying “I’m at the White House” instead of just “DC.”

Nah, I agree with this New Yorker. I live in Australia btw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wish they had released more context regarding what Epstein/Maxwell were talking about at the time.

My guess is that Epstein thought that Trump was the guy who narced on him because of their falling out over that real estate deal.

My guess is Trump knowingly had sex with an underage trafficked victim in Epstein's house based on this latest leak of Epstein saying Trump spent hours with a victim. Hey MAGAs, what do you think Trump was doing with one of Epstein's girls? Discussing the weather?

The female in question needs to come forward. That's the only way. Everything else is innuendo and allegation.

The name is indeed Virginia per BBC

.it is not Virginia Giuffre.

Are you a Congressional insider?

Explain the BBC verification.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.

Not to mention that Giuffre moved to Australia when she was 19 and already too old for Epstein or Trump.

Did the email say they met in 2012, or was the email (about that) just written in 2012?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does "Police Chief etc. I'm 75% there" mean?

Exectly. Where is "there" -- what goal were they working toward?

Sarah Longwell figured this out on her show today. It means Epstein and Maxwell had been wondering who sold them out. Epstein finally figured out it was Trump so he emailed Maxwell to tell her. Trump was the dog that didn’t bark bc when the police chief was dragging everyone, Trump seemed immune annd was not mentioned/questioned even though he was at Epstein’s house for hours with underage girls. “I’m 75% there” means he’s 75% sure or 75% to figuring out the whole thing.

Could be, and that’s just further proof that he raped children. He’s sell anyone out to save himself.

Though, these made up narratives to try to sell Trump as a non child rapists are getting pretty entertaining.

Was he also secretly saving them from the basement of a pizza shop lmao

You drop phrases like "raped children" so easily. I wish you had the courage not to be anonymous when you say such things.

So he can send his army of violent criminals out to kidnap us too?

It is quite interesting to note though that you don’t see too many people defending him in public anymore, isn’t it perhaps it’s because they all know what he really is and don’t want to be associated with him? It works two ways you know.

Wait, what? You're calling him a child rapist because of immigration enforcement?

There is going to come a day where all these comments will be unmasked and communities will splinter.

Anonymous wrote:This is a very plausible theory of who’s behind the leak and what its intent is.

I'm sort of skeptical on the authencity. These are my reasons: 1) So now we believe a piece of trash like Epstein to be telling the truth? *If* Epstein wrote that, it was with an eye towards blackmailing Trump. This creep was the master blackmailer and knew how to play that game. 2) Ghislaine is planting these well-timed bombs. As pointed in the above theory, leverage to get out of jail free. Doesn't matter if Trump is guilty or innocent. The point is to blackmail him. The crowd Epstein and Ghislaine ran with murdered a bunch of those poor girls, and have threatened the others to get them to stay silent.

I hope Epstein's brother is as outraged as the rest of the country is, and I hope he is cooperating with the victims in their efforts to get justice. Otherwise I'm giving him the side eye.

What happened to the discharge petition?
I was told on here that Grijalva wasn't being sworn in because she was the 218th signature.