Anonymous wrote:That would certainly solve Union’s problems. But not GA. Do you have any evidence that older girls will choose Ga over ECNL? Because I do. As I said, evidence suggests otherwise. Clubs that choose boys over girls lose girls. Facts.
keep it up ur gonna get us another denial insta post.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine Arlington sticking with ECNL long. Their boy teams drive the club, and they are already starting to get pressure from families with boys coming up on their top teams. Those families will move if they can find an MLSN team.
I doubt they move if they get a second tier MLSN placement, like McLean. I don’t see that as being worth a change, but Arlington is likely good enough for a top MLSN spot. As more clubs make the switch from ECNl to GA on the girls side may help soften the blow on the girls side.
Needless to say, more moves coming in the next 18-24 months.
It is the girl's side that drives Arlington not the boy's. No way they move.
Paperwork already done.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of Arlington ECNL players are on the high school varsity teams around here. So if Arlington goes MLSNext they won’t be able to play anymore? I wonder if some will dislike that.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of Arlington ECNL players are on the high school varsity teams around here. So if Arlington goes MLSNext they won’t be able to play anymore? I wonder if some will dislike that.