Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 07:55     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.


So you believe UFC fans that tuned in were “worshipping” Trump rather than enjoying the MMA? Got it.


"Enjoying mma" is not "patriotic."

Dressing up a taxpayer scam in red, white, and blue does not make it patriotic.

Requiring military singers and bands to perform at a crass event does not make it "patriotic." On the contrary, it demeans the institution of the military.


+1 Spectacles of violence aren’t patriotic.

Trump is not America, however much he would like us to believe that. He’s a traitor. The 14th Amendment should have barred him from the Presidency, but these so-called “patriots” who enable Trump believe the Constitution is optional, democracy should be abolished, education and science are dangerous, and one third of Americans should be deported, jailed, or disenfranchised. Everything this country fought for, they’re dismantling.

That is the exact opposite of loving your country. No one destroys things that they love.
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 07:22     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.


So you believe UFC fans that tuned in were “worshipping” Trump rather than enjoying the MMA? Got it.


Well if it walks like a cult and quacks like a cult....yeah it's a cult.
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 07:19     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.


LOL...
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 07:05     Subject: Re:Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:Getting past the unprecedented visual stupidity of it (it'll be embarrassing history never to be repeated), the whole thing came across as "small" with the World Cup going on. It happened, grabbed one news cycle, and is now gone.


Agree. It happened the day after the Knicks, and just as the World Cup was starting. By contrast it was so small, an ugly gilded tchotchke of an event.
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 06:57     Subject: Re:Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Getting past the unprecedented visual stupidity of it (it'll be embarrassing history never to be repeated), the whole thing came across as "small" with the World Cup going on. It happened, grabbed one news cycle, and is now gone.
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 06:37     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.


So you believe UFC fans that tuned in were “worshipping” Trump rather than enjoying the MMA? Got it.
Trump for sure. I’m sure manny of them had never attended a MMA match.
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 05:59     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Are the roads open yet??
Anonymous
Post 06/16/2026 05:26     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.


So you believe UFC fans that tuned in were “worshipping” Trump rather than enjoying the MMA? Got it.


"Enjoying mma" is not "patriotic."

Dressing up a taxpayer scam in red, white, and blue does not make it patriotic.

Requiring military singers and bands to perform at a crass event does not make it "patriotic." On the contrary, it demeans the institution of the military.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 23:32     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.


So you believe UFC fans that tuned in were “worshipping” Trump rather than enjoying the MMA? Got it.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 21:59     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.


The Jerry Springer show was much classier than whatever the hell that was. But, for deplorables, like yourself, I can see why you enjoyed it.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 21:57     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.

Lol. There's nothing patriotic about worshipping a man who has no use for the Constitution.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 21:14     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

The event was really great imo. Very patriotic. We needed that.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 20:46     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.


Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.


Many people in the military would also cross the street.

MAGAs are vile POSs.


+1 My family is military, served in Iraq, and never voted MAGA. They serve along side MAGA, and MAGA is dumb.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 19:49     Subject: Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just putrid. So, so tacky. If I saw one of these people walking towards me, I'd cross the street. And that includes the POTUS. Revolting people.


Typical Democrat disdain for our military. Sad.


Many people in the military would also cross the street.

MAGAs are vile POSs.
Anonymous
Post 06/15/2026 19:41     Subject: Re:Trump says UFC match at WH next year.

Anonymous wrote:Who is Josh Hokit? Is this game of two men punching each other really that popular?

No, it’s really not.