Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA understands that the 86 term is from restaurants, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

He was on vacation in North Carolina with his wife when he saw the shell installation on the beach, photographed it and posted it to his Instagram.

And to this day, nobody has tried to murder Trump with rounded beach pebbles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

He was on vacation in North Carolina with his wife when he saw the shell installation on the beach, photographed it and posted it to his Instagram.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

Anonymous wrote:MAGA understands that the 86 term is from restaurants, right?

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.

Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.