Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m still struggling to adjust. Anyone else?
Yes. I've hit a wall and I'm going to submit a religious accommodation request.
What religious accommodation request would allow you to work from home??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m still struggling to adjust. Anyone else?
Yes. I've hit a wall and I'm going to submit a religious accommodation request.
Anonymous wrote:I found Jesus and am praying on my religious accommodation. 🙏
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s all BS. The RTO policies have more exemptions and loopholes than Swiss cheese. Only losers with no agency are adhering.
It’s almost as if the whole thing is a big tesr, to see which employees are high-agency and have the creativity, initiative, energy, and fortitude to circumvent stupid crap, versus which ones are mere passive sheep rule followers. As is the case with most things in life.
I don’t know where you work but this is not the case at my agency. No loopholes, the only exemption is military spouse. No one is circumventing. Leadership is sucking up to the Trump administration by showing who is the biggest jerk and treating employees badly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s frustrating. The only reason for the strict Fed RTO policies is to shed workers. But they know WHICH workers they want to shed
— The lazy, useless ones. So just get rid of them. And treat the ones that you actually like (yes, they do like and want some) with respect.
The current approach is like punishing all your kids just bc one of them sucks.
EXACTLY. Which is why I didn’t join the union. The unions focus on the weakest links and drag everyone else down. Someone should create a union only for well-educated, white collar professional Feds who actually have other options.
You aren’t very smart The unions are the ones that secured telework policies in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:It’s all BS. The RTO policies have more exemptions and loopholes than Swiss cheese. Only losers with no agency are adhering.
It’s almost as if the whole thing is a big tesr, to see which employees are high-agency and have the creativity, initiative, energy, and fortitude to circumvent stupid crap, versus which ones are mere passive sheep rule followers. As is the case with most things in life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s frustrating. The only reason for the strict Fed RTO policies is to shed workers. But they know WHICH workers they want to shed
— The lazy, useless ones. So just get rid of them. And treat the ones that you actually like (yes, they do like and want some) with respect.
The current approach is like punishing all your kids just bc one of them sucks.
EXACTLY. Which is why I didn’t join the union. The unions focus on the weakest links and drag everyone else down. Someone should create a union only for well-educated, white collar professional Feds who actually have other options.
You aren’t very smart The unions are the ones that secured telework policies in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:I’m still struggling to adjust. Anyone else?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s frustrating. The only reason for the strict Fed RTO policies is to shed workers. But they know WHICH workers they want to shed
— The lazy, useless ones. So just get rid of them. And treat the ones that you actually like (yes, they do like and want some) with respect.
The current approach is like punishing all your kids just bc one of them sucks.
EXACTLY. Which is why I didn’t join the union. The unions focus on the weakest links and drag everyone else down. Someone should create a union only for well-educated, white collar professional Feds who actually have other options.
Anonymous wrote:It’s frustrating. The only reason for the strict Fed RTO policies is to shed workers. But they know WHICH workers they want to shed
— The lazy, useless ones. So just get rid of them. And treat the ones that you actually like (yes, they do like and want some) with respect.
The current approach is like punishing all your kids just bc one of them sucks.