Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

That’s pretty weak sauce of Trump to get pushed around by Bukele like that.

It is Bukele’s country and Bukele’s citizen. All Trump can do is ask.

That you guys still want this wife beater back here is insane.

Poor excuse. He's ineffective.

Also, how's the economy Trump?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

That’s pretty weak sauce of Trump to get pushed around by Bukele like that.

It is Bukele’s country and Bukele’s citizen. All Trump can do is ask.

That you guys still want this wife beater back here is insane.

ALL he can do is ask? No. He looks weak AF.

It would have been MORE beneficial for Trump to return him when first requested, that way they can show that they're able to swiftly correct mistakes and commence their deportations. But because they're so weak and powerless when they do make mistakes, which includes deporting US Citizens, deportations will slow down to a snails pace to nothing via the courts. Meanwhile, Obama was able to deport millions of illegals using LEGAL means because that's what real efficiency looks like.

God, when is cholesterol finally going to do its thing here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

That’s pretty weak sauce of Trump to get pushed around by Bukele like that.

It is Bukele’s country and Bukele’s citizen. All Trump can do is ask.

That you guys still want this wife beater back here is insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

Look, either way dear leader looks bad.

*If Trump tried and and Bukele said no, truly pathetic. Talk about a weakling.

*If he didn't try, which we all know to be true of course, and they are all just chuckling about it behind closed doors and then lying to the public, then he is breaking the law.

Discovery is gonna be fun. Whistleblowers where ya at?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

Trump is such a cuck.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

Look, either way dear leader looks bad.

*If Trump tried and and Bukele said no, truly pathetic. Talk about a weakling.

*If he didn't try, which we all know to be true of course, and they are all just chuckling about it behind closed doors and then lying to the public, then he is breaking the law.

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm the judge is not going to like this

They are all performing for Trump. They are more eager to get Trump's approval than they are: afraid of breaking the law, afraid of the way history will judge them and, frankly, afraid of going to hell.

Hmmm the judge is not going to like this

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

That’s pretty weak sauce of Trump to get pushed around by Bukele like that.

Anonymous wrote:Curiouser and curiouser

That's not confusing, they tried and they said no . Move on

Curiouser and curiouser

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol at the MAGA wasting a nice Sunday morning (at least it is in the DMV) gathering evidence to post on DCUM about how terrible Abrego Garcia is--and missing the whole point.

IT'S NOT ABOUT HIS CHARACTER. IT'S ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE.

Keep posting all you want about him. It still doesn't change the fact that the Trump administration defied a court order and removed him without due process, later admitted they had made a mistake, and now are doubling down.

As pointed out several times, it is a harmless mistake.
The correct procedure would have been to reopen his case and say the gang problem he said he was scared of no longer applies, and then they would have deported him to El Salvador.
Even this is not required under immigration law. The withholding of removal is not a right of the illegal immigrant.

I don't know what world you live in where getting sent to a notorious prison is a harmless mistake. IRL, it is a shocking and egregious mistake that should be fixed. The Supreme Court agreed 9-0.

Dam straight. An this is all ridiculous because it ain’t even a question he didn’t get the due diligence he had a right to have.

Anonymous wrote:In a new interview, Trump says he could bring back Abrego Garcia if he wants to. The president added he's "not the one making this decision," and said his attorneys do not want him to make the call, arguing he is following the law.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-kilmar-abrego-garcia-call-bukele/

Trump said before he could not bring Kilmar back. Bukele, in the White House, said he could not bring him back.

Which is it? If they really have the power to bring him back, let's see it done.

Meanwhile, Trump is trying to distract from this topic by doing fifty other insane things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol at the MAGA wasting a nice Sunday morning (at least it is in the DMV) gathering evidence to post on DCUM about how terrible Abrego Garcia is--and missing the whole point.

IT'S NOT ABOUT HIS CHARACTER. IT'S ABOUT THE PRINCIPLE.

Keep posting all you want about him. It still doesn't change the fact that the Trump administration defied a court order and removed him without due process, later admitted they had made a mistake, and now are doubling down.

As pointed out several times, it is a harmless mistake.
The correct procedure would have been to reopen his case and say the gang problem he said he was scared of no longer applies, and then they would have deported him to El Salvador.
Even this is not required under immigration law. The withholding of removal is not a right of the illegal immigrant.

Deporting someone doesn’t typically result in their direct confinement to prison. This is not a “deportation”. This is fascism.

It did in this case. And it would have had the same result even if the US government didn't make the mistake they made.

Those are some interesting opinions but they aren’t the facts. Fact is, deportation is not the same as rendition. Fact is, he was not allowed to be deported there, much less renditioned. Talk to the Supreme Court about it.