Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Single: Married
Gay: Straight
Female: Male
Black: White
Trans: Cis
Migrant: Citizen
Bureaucrat: Businessperson
Atheist: Religious
Renter: Homeowner
The two parties are sorting themselves ever more cleanly.
I am married, straight, female, white, cis, bureaucrat, religious, homeowner. Which party do you place me in?
MAGA no matter how much you deny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
So, did you not listen? Or did you not understand what you heard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. Not necessarily of being gay. Could also mean a player, a commitmentphobe, bad in bed, controlling, or bad at relationships. My New York and DC girls are dating experts, and they have some rules of thumb. It’s a screaming red flag that if he’s never been married or engaged by 55, either you’re not going to enjoy dating him, or you ARE and then he’s going to flake on you like he flaked on everyone else he ever dated. Some of these types are gay, and some of them are way TOO straight to settle down.
Have any of your experts “typed”: Black vegans? That’s probably a difficult match on a good day. Throw in having to live a life centered in NJ and that’s seriously challenging— even before you get to personality and personal history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
So, did you not listen? Or did you not understand what you heard?
Why would I prioritize listening to his 24 hour rant? Did he say anything about securing our borders?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
So, did you not listen? Or did you not understand what you heard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Not necessarily of being gay. Could also mean a player, a commitmentphobe, bad in bed, controlling, or bad at relationships. My New York and DC girls are dating experts, and they have some rules of thumb. It’s a screaming red flag that if he’s never been married or engaged by 55, either you’re not going to enjoy dating him, or you ARE and then he’s going to flake on you like he flaked on everyone else he ever dated. Some of these types are gay, and some of them are way TOO straight to settle down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
Um, thats exactly what he did. For 25 hours. He didn't read Ted Cruz's green eggs or some such nonsense ..but you do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Booker said exactly nothing of substance.
Anonymous wrote:One great thing about what Booker did was make it really hard for media to criticize
what he did. Even Fox News tried to bash it.. while showing multiple clips of him making sense... it's about attention..and he is getting it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Single: Married
Gay: Straight
Female: Male
Black: White
Trans: Cis
Migrant: Citizen
Bureaucrat: Businessperson
Atheist: Religious
Renter: Homeowner
The two parties are sorting themselves ever more cleanly.
I am married, straight, female, white, cis, bureaucrat, religious, homeowner. Which party do you place me in?