Anonymous wrote:

Another activist liberal judge. What a surprise. Biden stacked the judiciary with these hack partisan judges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Another activist liberal judge. What a surprise. Biden stacked the judiciary with these hack partisan judges.

Do you have any precedent you can cite as to why you believe this ruling is faulty?

Anonymous wrote:the problem is, they already downloaded all of the banking information, accounts and social security numbers for every american...and now anyone in Russia, China, Iran etc all have access to it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Another activist liberal judge. What a surprise. Biden stacked the judiciary with these hack partisan judges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“The government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton on Friday night said it had dismissed a subcontractor who prepared a draft report saying that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency access to the Treasury’s payment system poses an “unprecedented insider threat risk” and should be suspended immediately.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/treasury-warned-insider-threat-risk-005911245.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This ruling is very important. DOGE is no longer allowed in the Treasury payment system. The Court found that DOGE's access to the Treasury payment system would cause irreparable harm without an injunction and that "because of the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question
will be more vulnerable than before to hacking. The Court’s further assessment is that, again for the reasons given by the States, the States have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims, with the States’ statutory claims presenting as particularly strong."

https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/state-of-new-york-et-al-v-trump-et-al-order-2025.pdf

This tweet by Musk was presented as evidence to prove that DOGE was stopping Treasury payments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This ruling is very important. DOGE is no longer allowed in the Treasury payment system. The Court found that DOGE's access to the Treasury payment system would cause irreparable harm without an injunction and that "because of the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question
will be more vulnerable than before to hacking. The Court’s further assessment is that, again for the reasons given by the States, the States have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims, with the States’ statutory claims presenting as particularly strong."

https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/state-of-new-york-et-al-v-trump-et-al-order-2025.pdf

This tweet by Musk was presented as evidence to prove that DOGE was stopping Treasury payments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that people in the U.S. Government know my U.S. Government issued ID number!!!1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's called State Capture.

Trump has outright said he is using Orban as a model.


https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10034251/

"State capture is a type of systematic corruption whereby narrow interest groups take control of the institutions and processes through which public policy is made, directing public policy away from the public interest and instead shaping it to serve their own interests... The captors of the state were businesspeople, soon to be known as ‘oligarchs’, who purchased influence over policy formation through direct kickbacks or promises of favours, using personal connections to the individuals and parties holding political power. This framing of business as the captors of politics probably always overstated the separation between the two spheres, when in many transition states, the distinction between the public and private sector was in fact blurred—sometimes intentionally. In the early years of post-Soviet transition in Russia, Wedel described the phenomenon of “institutional nomads” (Wedel 2003), i.e., individuals who strategically moved between public-sector and private-sector roles, depending on where they could best access advantages or avoid regulation. By shifting their shape and surfing on the rules that applied to different sectors, they were able to either influence the rules or evade them, effectively operating outside legal frameworks."