Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
Up until late elementary I think you can still inspire the kids to care. But after that it is very difficult. We should allow students to drop out at 15 or 16, and leave the rest of high school to those who want to be there.
Anonymous wrote:Serious answers only. How can schools raise performances of students at the lowest levels? Free meals help nourish brains and bodies, are they "healthy" is questionable. What else? It it sending home books (lots of books) for them to read? More math practice practice practice. Is it helping change their attitude towards learning, less screen time? Is it identifying learning disorders in Pre-K (if eligible) or by K? Parents/guardians of these students need assistance too but there is time and language and cultural barriers- getting them information about identifying learning issues, ELL services, attitude/views about learning?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious answers only. How can schools raise performances of students at the lowest levels? Free meals help nourish brains and bodies, are they "healthy" is questionable. What else? It it sending home books (lots of books) for them to read? More math practice practice practice. Is it helping change their attitude towards learning, less screen time? Is it identifying learning disorders in Pre-K (if eligible) or by K? Parents/guardians of these students need assistance too but there is time and language and cultural barriers- getting them information about identifying learning issues, ELL services, attitude/views about learning?
Are each of the lowest performing students assigned a case manager or staff to work with them and their families for the school year?
Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
+1. Assign a social worker to cover each school to go chase the parents.
When I saw ES kids in the local playground at 10 PM on a school night, you know their parents just destroyed any hope of an academic future for them.
Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
Is it just part of their "culture" not to care?
Anonymous wrote:Most of these kids (if not all) simply don’t care, their parents don’t care, their siblings don’t care, and even their cats and dogs don’t care. I don’t know why we are wasting resources on them.
Anonymous wrote:Serious answers only. How can schools raise performances of students at the lowest levels? Free meals help nourish brains and bodies, are they "healthy" is questionable. What else? It it sending home books (lots of books) for them to read? More math practice practice practice. Is it helping change their attitude towards learning, less screen time? Is it identifying learning disorders in Pre-K (if eligible) or by K? Parents/guardians of these students need assistance too but there is time and language and cultural barriers- getting them information about identifying learning issues, ELL services, attitude/views about learning?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:66k is not much once pension, healthcare, fed/state/Moco taxes, and (optional but not really) union dues are taken out. Don’t forget all the stuff teachers typically have to buy for their classrooms or to reward kids these days.
You are looking at about $4k a month in takehome income with no money from July to mid-September. Most unmarried teachers live paycheck to paycheck. That needs to cover housing (good luck!) student loans, food, etc.
When we do the math with high school students in class, everyone basically calculates that $80k is really the wage needed to live MoCo to account for all major and typical expenses.
It’s better than what county workers get paid. They can spread out their checks over 12 months and take summer jobs. This isn’t anything new. Many of us made that much or less starting out. We got roommates, carefully grocery shopped, etc. no different now.
Anonymous wrote:Truly reimagining education. Make the ES school day 8 hrs which would allow more time for eating healthy, recess, tutoring, meetings, etc. And better align with parents schedules. Also Add paraeducators, teachers in training, assistants teachers whoever to help support classes over 18 kids.
MS/HS be 7.5hours with 8periods at 50mins, 5-6mins in between classes. Block schedules can be plan within the same hours. Reduce teaching load to 4 classes.