Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

He would weak and weird. That would make all of us lose respect for her judgement.

I don’t believe you in the slightest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never had a speech hit so hard. I may not agree with RFK Jr on everything, but his genuine commitment to our children’s health is something every parent needs to get behind.

I want less government.

Mind your own damn business

Or 900 pages of Project 2025

WTAF does project2025 have to do with Trump?

A: nothing at all. He has disavowed it countless times.

You are a weird person to keep bringing it up, PP.

Nice try! It's his baby - and he's going to have to carry it.

He's "disavowed" all kinds of things but the thing about being a serial liar is that we don't have to believe his lies.

This is how Dems work. Doesn't matter what you say or do -- they will still believe whatever they want. Just like the Charlottesville hoax that they continue to perpetuate after being told and shown time and time again that they are wrong. They just say: "But we know what he REALLY meant."

Republicans that vote for Trump are just as stupid as the Dems. Get over it.

I'm not a Dem, but there is no way in hell any Dem is as stupid or vile as a Trump supporter or frankly, the avg Republican voter. On what planet do you think Bill Clinton (as intelligent as he is, unlike that orange clown) could get the nomination NOW knowing his connection to Epstein? On what planet do you think a Dem could say "I could shoot someone on 5th avenue and not lose a supporter" and actually KEEP their supporters?

The fact is that Republicans have less than no standards, and that has been the case for decades. That's why someone as brain-damaged, semi-literate, unintelligible and with a sketchy private life like Herschel Walker could potentially become a freaking SENATOR on the Republican side. It's why mediocre clowns like Palin could potentially become a VP, because Republicans think so little of the women who vote for them that they thought someone like Palin simply being female was enough of a CV to get votes. Ignore her trashy family, lack of intelligence and mediocrity.

Look at what the Dems nominate for president vs what Republicans nominate. The fact is that Obama had to be "Cliff Huxtable" while the Repubs just want you to be white and you can be as vile as Bill Cosby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never had a speech hit so hard. I may not agree with RFK Jr on everything, but his genuine commitment to our children’s health is something every parent needs to get behind.

I want less government.

Mind your own damn business

Or 900 pages of Project 2025

WTAF does project2025 have to do with Trump?

A: nothing at all. He has disavowed it countless times.

You are a weird person to keep bringing it up, PP.

Nice try! It's his baby - and he's going to have to carry it.

He's "disavowed" all kinds of things but the thing about being a serial liar is that we don't have to believe his lies.

This is how Dems work. Doesn't matter what you say or do -- they will still believe whatever they want. Just like the Charlottesville hoax that they continue to perpetuate after being told and shown time and time again that they are wrong. They just say: "But we know what he REALLY meant."

Republicans that vote for Trump are just as stupid as the Dems. Get over it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because she has good judgment and he’s insane. I love her and I would have looked askance if they had even taken the meeting.

+1 To paraphrase a once-great patriarch, these are not serious people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

He would weak and weird. That would make all of us lose respect for her judgement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?

Sore loser.

Anonymous wrote:Freak show all around!

Anonymous wrote:Am here looking for barbecued dog meat. Willing to pay. Any info?

Anonymous wrote:Am here looking for barbecued dog meat. Willing to pay. Any info?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never had a speech hit so hard. I may not agree with RFK Jr on everything, but his genuine commitment to our children’s health is something every parent needs to get behind.

I want less government.

Mind your own damn business

Or 900 pages of Project 2025

WTAF does project2025 have to do with Trump?

A: nothing at all. He has disavowed it countless times.

You are a weird person to keep bringing it up, PP.

Nice try! It's his baby - and he's going to have to carry it.

He's "disavowed" all kinds of things but the thing about being a serial liar is that we don't have to believe his lies.

This is how Dems work. Doesn't matter what you say or do -- they will still believe whatever they want. Just like the Charlottesville hoax that they continue to perpetuate after being told and shown time and time again that they are wrong. They just say: "But we know what he REALLY meant."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn't she bring him in to her ticket and lock this down?

Because

1) he is insane
2) is an anti-vaxer, which kind of goes against science and rationality germane to an NIH, FDA and HHS that function properly

I didn't say she had to put him in charge of policy but she could have talked to the guy and kept him under her wing at least until after the election

Instead, she sicked her law-dogs on the guy and sued him in every state. Real nice.

Nice way to treat a fellow democrat. And now he is the terrible one?!?