Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

Kids grow and change every year, U17 and U19 are most stable in development.
So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.

Where are NVA 2012 come from?
Excellent pool of players from Loudoun?

look at pre ecnl results last year. They did very well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA = Loudoun. Just look at the org chart.

https://www.loudounsoccer.com/staff

That org chart doesn’t say anything. If you actually want to provide information, then see link below. Obviously GFR is no longer with NVA because the CEO was stealing money from the club and what not. The question is not about org structure but where the girls came from. Most came from loudoun for 2012s which you can see from the PRE ECNL record last year. https://www.nvaannouncement.com/_files/ugd/1df62c_a14f3c10bab0427ebb8429a7c7870823.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA = Loudoun. Just look at the org chart.

https://www.loudounsoccer.com/staff

That org chart doesn’t say anything. If you actually want to provide information, then see link below. Obviously GFR is no longer with NVA because the CEO was stealing money from the club and what not. The question is not about org structure but where the girls came from. Most came from loudoun for 2012s which you can see from the PRE ECNL record last year. https://www.nvaannouncement.com/_files/ugd/1df62c_a14f3c10bab0427ebb8429a7c7870823.pdf

Anonymous wrote:NVA = Loudoun. Just look at the org chart.

https://www.loudounsoccer.com/staff

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.

Where are NVA 2012 come from?
Excellent pool of players from Loudoun?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA 09s likely out of playoffs after losing to Arlington today. Went from finishing 2nd place last year to not even making playoffs. WTH happened?

Injuries

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

Is it fair to say 2012 NVA and 2011 Arlington just landed themselves better players overall and not much to do with coaching? Same can be true for Union 2010 or Bethesda 2010?

All of the above... NVA 2012 is an excellent pool of players, 2012 Arlington isn't as good as their parents say they are, and 2011 Arlington is a top 5 team in the country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

So same coaches on NVA but different results. Could be just better pool for 2012? Or Arlington 2012 just isn’t as good as the hype?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally got a chance to watch the Arlington girls 2011 team play today. Unfortunately, the NVA 2011s didn’t make much of a game of it. Arlington looked strong, well organized, and coached well. They dominated the game in all facets. NVAs back line looked like they had never played together before nor did they look like any of them had ever played defense in their lives before this game. Everyone one of them, especially on the weak side, was ball watching. The center mids and back line gave Arlington way too much space on the ball. The coaches for NVA, if you want to call them that, never made any adjustments and it didn’t look like they did any coaching at all the entire game in my opinion. From what I was overhearing in the stands it sounds like that’s kind of status quo for this team. If I was a parent of an NVA daughter on this team, I’d probably be looking elsewhere. And I don’t say that bc they lost to a clearly dominate team, I say that bc the coaching was nonexistent and nothing seemed to change…

Did you happen to watch the 2012's game, and see how those same coaches that you reference lead the NVA team to a dominate win... It's almost like the 2011 Arlington team is ranked top 5 in the country and hard beat if you're not at least top 10 in the country yourself

Anonymous wrote:NVA 09s likely out of playoffs after losing to Arlington today. Went from finishing 2nd place last year to not even making playoffs. WTH happened?

Anonymous wrote:If you want to talk about the fall from grace for any team, it should be the 2009s. The 2011s have never been a top team.