Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look, GDS is an elite high school that enrolls lots of kids with connections. Even if they aren’t legacies, they all know people. That’s why these kids do so well with college admissions. The rich get richer. Not exactly a Man Bites Dog story.
Meaning? Their parents somehow pulled strings to get their kids in?
Not quite. Meaning that their privilege is so pervasive in so many ways, large and small, that them having great success in college admissions is preordained. It’s just the way the world works.
Fortunately, in the end it really doesn’t matter that much.
Their parents of these kids are outliers. They kids are bound to be successful.
The number one thing parents should be asking themselves if they want to know if their own kid could/will have this success with college admissions at GDS: "Have I pushed the limits of innovative thinking and success myself?" Sounds like I'm joking but I'm not. I think you either have these genes or you don't.
Anonymous wrote:Aren’t there at least a couple of GDS parents who are on the Harvard board or are closely connected to it? Ketanji Brown Jackson was on the Harvard board and one of her kids is still at GDS I think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look, GDS is an elite high school that enrolls lots of kids with connections. Even if they aren’t legacies, they all know people. That’s why these kids do so well with college admissions. The rich get richer. Not exactly a Man Bites Dog story.
Meaning? Their parents somehow pulled strings to get their kids in?
Not quite. Meaning that their privilege is so pervasive in so many ways, large and small, that them having great success in college admissions is preordained. It’s just the way the world works.
Fortunately, in the end it really doesn’t matter that much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least one of the Harvard admits today is a legacy.
Legacy or whatever - if that's right that's 7 (including 3 EA) this year which is bananas.
Harvard Westlake in Los Angeles sent 13 to Harvard last year.
Anonymous wrote:Crazy that GDS has so many Harvard admits! Doesn’t seem like any other school had ANYONE get in RD to any Ivys last night, much less Harvard. Instagrams very quiet….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look, GDS is an elite high school that enrolls lots of kids with connections. Even if they aren’t legacies, they all know people. That’s why these kids do so well with college admissions. The rich get richer. Not exactly a Man Bites Dog story.
Meaning? Their parents somehow pulled strings to get their kids in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crazy that GDS has so many Harvard admits! Doesn’t seem like any other school had ANYONE get in RD to any Ivys last night, much less Harvard. Instagrams very quiet….
Maybe kids are considering their options, [/b]or just not obnoxious enough to post results while classmates are processing their news[b]?
No these kids are plenty obnoxious enough…never been a problem. Every second of their lives is advertised and they don’t care if a classmate feels bad about it!
Anonymous wrote:Huh? There’s some Cornell.
Anonymous wrote:Crazy that GDS has so many Harvard admits! Doesn’t seem like any other school had ANYONE get in RD to any Ivys last night, much less Harvard. Instagrams very quiet….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crazy that GDS has so many Harvard admits! Doesn’t seem like any other school had ANYONE get in RD to any Ivys last night, much less Harvard. Instagrams very quiet….
Maybe kids are considering their options, [/b]or just not obnoxious enough to post results while classmates are processing their news[b]?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least one of the Harvard admits today is a legacy.
Legacy or whatever - if that's right that's 7 (including 3 EA) this year which is bananas.
Anonymous wrote:If you want your kid to get into an Ivy, GDS is the way to go. The kids seem to get in without crazy ECs
Anonymous wrote:How does this fit with the narrative that the poor kids in private would surely get better results in public?
Anonymous wrote:How does this fit with the narrative that the poor kids in private would surely get better results in public?