Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes. She is being prudent again.
They have been ANYTHING but transparent.
And, her colleague that was right outside those doors was not "answering questions." He was listening to questions and working very hard NOT to answer them.
They are doing a great job of passing the buck and giving reporters the run-around. But, answering questions? Nope.
KJP refers reporters to the WH counsel. WH counsel refers reporters to the DOJ. DOJ doesn't respond to questions.
This administration is a joke.
Not commenting on ongoing investigations is normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes. She is being prudent again.
They have been ANYTHING but transparent.
And, her colleague that was right outside those doors was not "answering questions." He was listening to questions and working very hard NOT to answer them.
They are doing a great job of passing the buck and giving reporters the run-around. But, answering questions? Nope.
KJP refers reporters to the WH counsel. WH counsel refers reporters to the DOJ. DOJ doesn't respond to questions.
This administration is a joke.
Not commenting on ongoing investigations is normal.
Sure. She was asked the other day if she (and the president since she speaks for him) thinks it would be wise for former presidents and VPs search their documents for classified material.
She responded.... "I will refer you to the WH counsel."
Heck. John Kirby deals with questions regarding this topic than KJP does.
Telling reporters to talk to lawyers regarding ongoing investigations is also normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes. She is being prudent again.
They have been ANYTHING but transparent.
And, her colleague that was right outside those doors was not "answering questions." He was listening to questions and working very hard NOT to answer them.
They are doing a great job of passing the buck and giving reporters the run-around. But, answering questions? Nope.
KJP refers reporters to the WH counsel. WH counsel refers reporters to the DOJ. DOJ doesn't respond to questions.
This administration is a joke.
Not commenting on ongoing investigations is normal.
Sure. She was asked the other day if she (and the president since she speaks for him) thinks it would be wise for former presidents and VPs search their documents for classified material.
She responded.... "I will refer you to the WH counsel."
Heck. John Kirby deals with questions regarding this topic than KJP does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes. She is being prudent again.
They have been ANYTHING but transparent.
And, her colleague that was right outside those doors was not "answering questions." He was listening to questions and working very hard NOT to answer them.
They are doing a great job of passing the buck and giving reporters the run-around. But, answering questions? Nope.
KJP refers reporters to the WH counsel. WH counsel refers reporters to the DOJ. DOJ doesn't respond to questions.
This administration is a joke.
Not commenting on ongoing investigations is normal.
Anonymous wrote:
Do we already know how those classified materials found at several Biden locations got there to begin with?
Who's investigating that?
Anonymous wrote:Ah, yes. She is being prudent again.
They have been ANYTHING but transparent.
And, her colleague that was right outside those doors was not "answering questions." He was listening to questions and working very hard NOT to answer them.
They are doing a great job of passing the buck and giving reporters the run-around. But, answering questions? Nope.
KJP refers reporters to the WH counsel. WH counsel refers reporters to the DOJ. DOJ doesn't respond to questions.
This administration is a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Bets on whether new classified materials will be found AGAIN at Biden's?
You lose. Pay up.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64488011
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Comer (R-Ky.) told Fox News’ “Hannity” Tuesday night that Archives general counsel Gary Stern said in a closed-door interview he could not tell lawmakers who ordered the Archives not to put out a press release announcing the Nov. 2 find at the Penn Biden Center.
“There are only two people that could have given those orders, and that’s either the Department of Justice with [Attorney General] Merrick Garland or the White House with Joe Biden,” Comer said.
“So it shows right there that this Department of Justice and this White House is interfering with this,” he added.
Comer knows this is an ongoing investigation, and he knew what the answer would be before he asked Stern the question. He's creating a problem so he can go on Hannity and complain about it.
Let the investigation run its course, then bring NARA leadership in to testify in front of the committee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Bets on whether new classified materials will be found AGAIN at Biden's?
You lose. Pay up.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64488011
Anonymous wrote:
Comer (R-Ky.) told Fox News’ “Hannity” Tuesday night that Archives general counsel Gary Stern said in a closed-door interview he could not tell lawmakers who ordered the Archives not to put out a press release announcing the Nov. 2 find at the Penn Biden Center.
“There are only two people that could have given those orders, and that’s either the Department of Justice with [Attorney General] Merrick Garland or the White House with Joe Biden,” Comer said.
“So it shows right there that this Department of Justice and this White House is interfering with this,” he added.
Anonymous wrote:
Do we already know how those classified materials found at several Biden locations got there to begin with?
Who's investigating that?
Anonymous wrote:
Bets on whether new classified materials will be found AGAIN at Biden's?