Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Aww you seem really hurt.

SJP has natural beauty, Footloose, Honeymoon in Vegas. She has also a special star quality that has endured through her career. Sure, she could eat a biscuit but I just don't get the hater posters.

They hate Jews is the problem

Here we go.No one is obligated to find you good looking regardless of your ethnicity . If that's being Jew hater, so be it .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally any skinny woman can look like her with a $500 salon haircut and designer clothes. She’s not attractive. When she’s in normal clothes she looks like an old hag.

Umhmm, because every 56 year old in DC is super thin, in amazing shape, and wears the latest couture. Right. Literally any woman.

Rich white women in DMV are thin. Obesity is largely a low class thing.

Is that your opinion after moving here? Koowel. But those of us from the DC area understand Carrie Bradshaw a bit more

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Aww you seem really hurt.

SJP has natural beauty, Footloose, Honeymoon in Vegas. She has also a special star quality that has endured through her career. Sure, she could eat a biscuit but I just don't get the hater posters.

I’ve been told that I look like SJP, and I’m sorry she’s really not good looking. When she was young she had youth in her side plus nice skin, nice teeth and nice hair. Now she has perfect grooming on her side but objectively she has a long face, a long rather large nose and small eyes. If you find that attractive great! There’s hope for people like me that share similar features!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Aww you seem really hurt.

SJP has natural beauty, Footloose, Honeymoon in Vegas. She has also a special star quality that has endured through her career. Sure, she could eat a biscuit but I just don't get the hater posters.

They hate Jews is the problem

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Aww you seem really hurt.

SJP has natural beauty, Footloose, Honeymoon in Vegas. She has also a special star quality that has endured through her career. Sure, she could eat a biscuit but I just don't get the hater posters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Aww you seem really hurt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I for one do not “idolize” her, nor do I idolize any celebrity, since I’m not 12. I’m pushing back on the idea that she is objectively unattractive, because beauty and attraction are always subjective. And its a coward who goes around slagging off celeb’s looks while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. If you had to attach your photo to your posts, you’d be a lot more circumspect in what you post, since your vitriolic attacks open you up to judgment of your own looks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

I'm still reeling from the Trump comparison.

Yes, there are people who defend Trump no matter what. I am not one (also do not worship Biden).

But defending the CHARACTER of Carrie as being enough of a "whole package" to be attractive makes me a die-hard Trump supporter!

God I love this place!

Anonymous wrote: Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*

Defending their idol on Christmas...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Literally any skinny woman can look like her with a $500 salon haircut and designer clothes. She’s not attractive. When she’s in normal clothes she looks like an old hag.

Umhmm, because every 56 year old in DC is super thin, in amazing shape, and wears the latest couture. Right. Literally any woman.

Rich white women in DMV are thin. Obesity is largely a low class thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet 95% of you on here could only dream of looking like SJP at age 56, especially her figure, hair, and style sense. Kudos to her for staying so in shape and not giving in to the pressures of the industry to get tons of work and look plastic-y. She has aged beautifully.

This is how I know you're a below average woman when it comes to looks . By the way , she's had work done . Additionally , work done works when you're already good looking which she isn't.

What the actual F is wrong with you?

Uh? What's wrong with me ? I guess if I, like the majority, don't buy into the scam of sjp as a paragon of beauty , then yes! I'll proudly something right is wrong with me .

I mean, this is all opinion. Some people think she’s attractive, others don’t. Why are you so hell bent on insisting your opinion is right?

This is demonstrably false. You're attempting to give off the impression that, opinions are evenly split when it comes to her look, they're not .

Beauty is all subjective, so no, it’s not demonstrably false.

Beauty being subjective is always the defense of ugly people .

Very few people are universally considered beautiful or ugly. Even celebrities.
I happen to think Brad Pitt is and always was ugly. My closest male friend (who is straight) thinks Salma Hayek is “a dog”. I have tons of examples of wide disagreement among friends about a famous person’s looks. Even I have been called “the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen” and “kind of mean looking” by different people in the same day.
And sometimes one person can be both beautiful and ugly in different situations. I think SJP is generally unattractive but there were moments in SATC when I found her beautiful. I’ve heard people say the same about Lady Gaga.

This thread is bizarre. I simply do not understand what you people must be smoking to have such virulent criticism for someone you don't know. How can you live if you get so deeply upset when you see random celebrities you don't happen to appreciate? What other completely irrelevant things do you go off the deep end about? How do you have any energy left to do your jobs and raise your children?

Anonymous wrote:Literally any skinny woman can look like her with a $500 salon haircut and designer clothes. She’s not attractive. When she’s in normal clothes she looks like an old hag.

Yes, exactly. She doesn’t have that which makes beautiful people untouchable; natural born beauty. A normal woman cannot compete with Angelina Jolie’s beauty and the wealth, status and privilege her beauty has brought her. But any average woman can look even better than SJP, with the right trainer, makeup artist and oodles of money. Hence the anger at her wealth and status as a fashion/ beauty icon. Women like her aren’t supposed to get opportunities reserved for the beautiful.

Anonymous wrote:Literally any skinny woman can look like her with a $500 salon haircut and designer clothes. She’s not attractive. When she’s in normal clothes she looks like an old hag.

Umhmm, because every 56 year old in DC is super thin, in amazing shape, and wears the latest couture. Right. Literally any woman.

Poor SJP boosters . *sigh*