Anonymous
01/22/2024 14:30
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Why was the GOP so clueless that did not understand that this is a critical issue for women and they will vote about it.
They are the dog that caught the car. They don't care about women. It is about power and control.
Anonymous
01/22/2024 14:20
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Why was the GOP so clueless that did not understand that this is a critical issue for women and they will vote about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous
01/22/2024 11:03
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
And they will have to be fine with losing some elections. Don't be greedy. You win some and you lose some.
I think they're totally fine with it. For many on the right, it seems a stroke of good fortune that the height of the post-overturn backlash is happening when the left is facing gale-force headwinds brought about by the sorry state of the economy, foreign affairs, and the border crisis. That is really blunting the effects.
Hello, Earth is calling. The Economy is great, Americans don't vote on foreign policy, and did you mean immigration that has been an issue for 20 years because GOP refuse to vote for any policy other than their extreme stuff that they put forward for red meat?
Anonymous
01/22/2024 10:42
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
And they will have to be fine with losing some elections. Don't be greedy. You win some and you lose some.
I think they're totally fine with it. For many on the right, it seems a stroke of good fortune that the height of the post-overturn backlash is happening when the left is facing gale-force headwinds brought about by the sorry state of the economy, foreign affairs, and the border crisis. That is really blunting the effects.
You got your forced birthing in over 20 states. That is what you are going to get until progress is made in restoration of women's rights.
Anonymous
01/22/2024 10:37
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
And they will have to be fine with losing some elections. Don't be greedy. You win some and you lose some.
I think they're totally fine with it. For many on the right, it seems a stroke of good fortune that the height of the post-overturn backlash is happening when the left is facing gale-force headwinds brought about by the sorry state of the economy, foreign affairs, and the border crisis. That is really blunting the effects.
Anonymous
01/22/2024 09:28
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
Which shows they are full of shit when they talk about individual liberties. "Delegate to the states," is just another way of saying that Trump and the right-wing justices took reproductive liberties away from individuals and gave them to the government.
Anonymous
01/22/2024 08:47
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Biden expands abortion, contraception protections on Roe anniversary https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/01/22/biden-abortion-contraception/
Anonymous
01/22/2024 06:42
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
But many GOP electeds want a national ban. So it's not really delegating to states.
Pro tip: the SCOTUS decision didn’t delegate it to states. It delegated it to “the people and their representatives.” That’s how a national ban is still on the table despite people who don’t know what they’re talking about still say that SCOTUS delegated it to states.
The forced birthers know that full well. They just repeat their pre programmed phrases regardless of what reality is.
The GOP is going for a national ban on abortion and they’ll ban birth control too. Why would they care about the consequences?
Anonymous
01/22/2024 00:32
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
But many GOP electeds want a national ban. So it's not really delegating to states.
Pro tip: the SCOTUS decision didn’t delegate it to states. It delegated it to “the people and their representatives.” That’s how a national ban is still on the table despite people who don’t know what they’re talking about still say that SCOTUS delegated it to states.
Anonymous
01/22/2024 00:11
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“According to state data, even before S.B. 8 half the counties in Texas were unequipped to treat pregnant women, lacking a single specialist in women’s health, such as an ob-gyn or a certified midwife. Multiple doctors told me that the overturning of Roe v. Wade, in June of 2022, exacerbated the crisis, as practitioners retired early or moved to states where they’d have more liberty to make medical judgments. So who, exactly, was supposed to handle the extra deliveries in women’s-health deserts such as Caldwell County? What would become of women in remote locales who experienced a hemorrhage or a ruptured fallopian tube?”
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/01/15/abortion-high-risk-pregnancy-yeni-glick
This is long but worth reading. It’s possible that a woman has already died due to Texas’s lack of care for women. OBGyns agree that this patient was so sick so early that she should have been offered a therapeutic abortion to end the pregnancy that killed her. No guarantee that she would have made that choice, but no one made it available to her so we’ll never know.
I can all but guarantee that several women have died as a result of the draconian, authoritarian forced birth policies being forced on America.
Maternal mortality rates are very high right now esp in women of color but even higher in abortion restricting states since 2022.
Republicans want women to die . They don’t care
Anonymous
01/21/2024 22:42
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
And they will have to be fine with losing some elections. Don't be greedy. You win some and you lose some.
Anonymous
01/21/2024 22:30
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
Ok. They get a vote and so do all the voters that are not fine with the decision.
Anonymous
01/21/2024 22:30
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe flush them down the toilet?
Overturning roe was a terrible move politically and is costing the GOP votes. The GOP got what it wanted and the consequence is losing elections. What do you expect when you do completely disrespect half the electorate.
Most GOP voters are fine with the SC decision to delegate to states.
But many GOP electeds want a national ban. So it's not really delegating to states.