Anonymous
Post 01/20/2024 12:48     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 01/20/2024 00:18     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:

Very fine people.

Of course forced birthers groups write the laws; conservatives in general aren’t bright.

And jailing doctors? Enjoy the dwindling number of them in your state, forced birthers.
Anonymous
Post 01/19/2024 21:30     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 01/19/2024 12:36     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down



Very fine people.
Anonymous
Post 01/19/2024 12:23     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 01/18/2024 13:39     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Even McEnany knows the GOP have a BIG problem.

When McEnany knows which way the wind is blowing…
Anonymous
Post 01/18/2024 13:23     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Even McEnany knows the GOP have a BIG problem.
Anonymous
Post 01/16/2024 21:04     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Because the six-week abortion ban they passed last year isn’t extreme enough, a Florida Republican has now introduced legislation that would prohibit nearly all abortions in the state and criminalize the doctors who perform them.
https://floridaphoenix.com/2024/01/08/virtually-all-abortions-would-be-illegal-in-florida-under-new-proposal-filed-by-a-house-republican/

Thanks to a bunch of grassroots volunteers like me, the FL Republican got crushed in tonight's special election. Saw a stat that abortion was #1 issue for Iowa evangelicals who caucused for DeSantis. These people have no idea about women's healthcare and are clearly out of touch with where the rest of the country is. The anti-abortionists have drunk their own kookaid, unaware that it makes their candidates unelectable.
Anonymous
Post 01/16/2024 20:20     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Because the six-week abortion ban they passed last year isn’t extreme enough, a Florida Republican has now introduced legislation that would prohibit nearly all abortions in the state and criminalize the doctors who perform them.
https://floridaphoenix.com/2024/01/08/virtually-all-abortions-would-be-illegal-in-florida-under-new-proposal-filed-by-a-house-republican/
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2024 16:57     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:You know, I read this. It was supposed to be funny and maybe it was before RvW was overturned, but it sure as heck is not now.



It never was funny and the way women’s health problems are statistically not taken seriously at all is why the GOP was able to sweep away our health care in a minute.
Anonymous
Post 01/15/2024 16:34     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

You know, I read this. It was supposed to be funny and maybe it was before RvW was overturned, but it sure as heck is not now.


Anonymous
Post 01/12/2024 12:14     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“According to state data, even before S.B. 8 half the counties in Texas were unequipped to treat pregnant women, lacking a single specialist in women’s health, such as an ob-gyn or a certified midwife. Multiple doctors told me that the overturning of Roe v. Wade, in June of 2022, exacerbated the crisis, as practitioners retired early or moved to states where they’d have more liberty to make medical judgments. So who, exactly, was supposed to handle the extra deliveries in women’s-health deserts such as Caldwell County? What would become of women in remote locales who experienced a hemorrhage or a ruptured fallopian tube?”
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/01/15/abortion-high-risk-pregnancy-yeni-glick

This is long but worth reading. It’s possible that a woman has already died due to Texas’s lack of care for women. OBGyns agree that this patient was so sick so early that she should have been offered a therapeutic abortion to end the pregnancy that killed her. No guarantee that she would have made that choice, but no one made it available to her so we’ll never know.

I can all but guarantee that several women have died as a result of the draconian, authoritarian forced birth policies being forced on America.
Anonymous
Post 01/12/2024 12:13     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:🤔 whole bunch of car-catching dogs interviewed in here
Worried about losing in 2024, Iowa’s Republican voters are less interested in talking about abortion
https://apnews.com/article/iowa-republicans-presidential-candidates-abortion-55dd7067d626c4add1f1270c03e33655?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Bunch of cowards. Happy to ban abortion, planning to ban abortion, but they don’t want to lose based on how people vote on their ideas so… they’ll just be quiet as mice.
Anonymous
Post 01/12/2024 11:32     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

🤔 whole bunch of car-catching dogs interviewed in here
Worried about losing in 2024, Iowa’s Republican voters are less interested in talking about abortion
https://apnews.com/article/iowa-republicans-presidential-candidates-abortion-55dd7067d626c4add1f1270c03e33655?utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter
Anonymous
Post 01/10/2024 22:35     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Here he is ladies, the guy people keep saying is moderate on the abortion issue.