Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we have lost the war, and have to negotiate terms of surrender? Is this really happening?
Yes it happened a month ago.
Why can’t we just “walk away”?
Iran wants reparations.
I get that, but would the US have to pay if we just leave and drop it? They could close the Strait but they can do that even if we do pay.
Yes. We have to pay. We attacked them unprovoked, committed heinous war crimes, and now we must pay.
I agree with the part in bold, but don’t quite see why the US would pay have to pay reparations if we just left. Ethically, we probably should, but that’s not my question.
Because Iran then would close the SOH leading to pandemonium. That economic and political pain would be much worse than working out an agreement. Leading up to the MOU Trump was desperate for a deal and was too weak to push back to Iran's demands that included reparations.
What would guarantee that they wouldn’t just close it again? “We want another $100b, Strait is closed”.
You are correct that Iran could threaten again. In that scenario, other countries with better ties to Iran (China, Russia?) could tell them to cool it.
The JCPOA had other countries on board (including China and Russia) to collectively restrain Iran.
I got that.
I still don’t see what we gain by giving them $300b+.
Why should we gain anything? This war was unjustified. We're the ones who blew up a girls' school.
I don’t think we should gain anything. We lost and it was stupid on Trump’s part to even pull us out of Obama’s deal let alone attack Iran, but I also don’t see why we would pay $300b if we just left.
You have to negotiate to leave.
US have military bases and business interests all around the Middle East.
You can’t just blow up things and experiment with your new weapon system for few months and say I am done and am going home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we have lost the war, and have to negotiate terms of surrender? Is this really happening?
Yes it happened a month ago.
Why can’t we just “walk away”?
Iran wants reparations.
I get that, but would the US have to pay if we just leave and drop it? They could close the Strait but they can do that even if we do pay.
Yes. We have to pay. We attacked them unprovoked, committed heinous war crimes, and now we must pay.
I agree with the part in bold, but don’t quite see why the US would pay have to pay reparations if we just left. Ethically, we probably should, but that’s not my question.
Because Iran then would close the SOH leading to pandemonium. That economic and political pain would be much worse than working out an agreement. Leading up to the MOU Trump was desperate for a deal and was too weak to push back to Iran's demands that included reparations.
What would guarantee that they wouldn’t just close it again? “We want another $100b, Strait is closed”.
You are correct that Iran could threaten again. In that scenario, other countries with better ties to Iran (China, Russia?) could tell them to cool it.
The JCPOA had other countries on board (including China and Russia) to collectively restrain Iran.
I got that.
I still don’t see what we gain by giving them $300b+.
Why should we gain anything? This war was unjustified. We're the ones who blew up a girls' school.
I don’t think we should gain anything. We lost and it was stupid on Trump’s part to even pull us out of Obama’s deal let alone attack Iran, but I also don’t see why we would pay $300b if we just left.
You have to negotiate to leave.
US have military bases and business interests all around the Middle East.
You can’t just blow up things and experiment with your new weapon system for few months and say I am done and am going home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we have lost the war, and have to negotiate terms of surrender? Is this really happening?
Yes it happened a month ago.
Why can’t we just “walk away”?
Iran wants reparations.
I get that, but would the US have to pay if we just leave and drop it? They could close the Strait but they can do that even if we do pay.
Yes. We have to pay. We attacked them unprovoked, committed heinous war crimes, and now we must pay.
I agree with the part in bold, but don’t quite see why the US would pay have to pay reparations if we just left. Ethically, we probably should, but that’s not my question.
Because Iran then would close the SOH leading to pandemonium. That economic and political pain would be much worse than working out an agreement. Leading up to the MOU Trump was desperate for a deal and was too weak to push back to Iran's demands that included reparations.
What would guarantee that they wouldn’t just close it again? “We want another $100b, Strait is closed”.
You are correct that Iran could threaten again. In that scenario, other countries with better ties to Iran (China, Russia?) could tell them to cool it.
The JCPOA had other countries on board (including China and Russia) to collectively restrain Iran.
I got that.
I still don’t see what we gain by giving them $300b+.
Why should we gain anything? This war was unjustified. We're the ones who blew up a girls' school.
I don’t think we should gain anything. We lost and it was stupid on Trump’s part to even pull us out of Obama’s deal let alone attack Iran, but I also don’t see why we would pay $300b if we just left.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So we have lost the war, and have to negotiate terms of surrender? Is this really happening?
Yes it happened a month ago.
Why can’t we just “walk away”?
Iran wants reparations.
I get that, but would the US have to pay if we just leave and drop it? They could close the Strait but they can do that even if we do pay.
Yes. We have to pay. We attacked them unprovoked, committed heinous war crimes, and now we must pay.
I agree with the part in bold, but don’t quite see why the US would pay have to pay reparations if we just left. Ethically, we probably should, but that’s not my question.
Because Iran then would close the SOH leading to pandemonium. That economic and political pain would be much worse than working out an agreement. Leading up to the MOU Trump was desperate for a deal and was too weak to push back to Iran's demands that included reparations.
What would guarantee that they wouldn’t just close it again? “We want another $100b, Strait is closed”.
You are correct that Iran could threaten again. In that scenario, other countries with better ties to Iran (China, Russia?) could tell them to cool it.
The JCPOA had other countries on board (including China and Russia) to collectively restrain Iran.
I got that.
I still don’t see what we gain by giving them $300b+.
Why should we gain anything? This war was unjustified. We're the ones who blew up a girls' school.
Anonymous wrote:Will the UAE and Saudi Arabia work things out with Iran? They hate each other.
Anonymous wrote:UAE Saudi Arabia are working on pipelines to take Iran's hostagetaking away.
Anonymous wrote:UAE Saudi Arabia are working on pipelines to take Iran's hostagetaking away.