Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:YT has the better offense and the best player on the field but it’s not a vast delta. FOGO maybe a push. Indy is vastly better everywhere else. If Indy plays undisciplined for too long early and the Refs call a tight game YT could get ahead and keep it interesting down to the wire. Otherwise this is a blowout Indy by 5+.

Best player on the field? I bet 2 Indy players individually have more points than 3.

Give me a break. Randles is a 4 star on IL and NLF and ranked top 40 in the class overall. Indy's guys are unranked low level D3 players.

Anonymous wrote:What I don’t get is the number of kids on here from Arlington and Great Falls (YT and Langley)

Can we talk about the 3 other more interesting games?
BF/ Madison and WP/Cosby will be better games to watch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha. There are paid evals with IL and then there are pure ratings and evals done from event performances where IL scouts are there. Guys who are good enough to get noticed - get noticed. Randels is a kid who got noticed because he's good, not because he paid his way onto anything. You don't get signed by Penn State if you're not one of the best in the country. There's definitely some paying your way through some of this when kids are younger (travels teams, etc) but not when you get to the level of a Randels and playing for a team like Penn State, that's all based on being good. IL is pure in how they do things. They wouldn't have been around for a long as they have if there were anything other.

Playing for Penn State? He may be committed, but that’s a long way from playing. Benchwarmer and practice JAG at best- far too small to get significant playing time.

I predict a year there and portal to a D3 in year 2.

I disagree that insidelacrosse’s existence validates their approach to “doing things” right (my gripe primarily with the paid evals), but Randles is legit. There is no denying that. He may not play much his first or second year but he will most definitely be a contributor by his junior year if he buys into tambroni’s system

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha. There are paid evals with IL and then there are pure ratings and evals done from event performances where IL scouts are there. Guys who are good enough to get noticed - get noticed. Randels is a kid who got noticed because he's good, not because he paid his way onto anything. You don't get signed by Penn State if you're not one of the best in the country. There's definitely some paying your way through some of this when kids are younger (travels teams, etc) but not when you get to the level of a Randels and playing for a team like Penn State, that's all based on being good. IL is pure in how they do things. They wouldn't have been around for a long as they have if there were anything other.

Playing for Penn State? He may be committed, but that’s a long way from playing. Benchwarmer and practice JAG at best- far too small to get significant playing time.

I predict a year there and portal to a D3 in year 2.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha. There are paid evals with IL and then there are pure ratings and evals done from event performances where IL scouts are there. Guys who are good enough to get noticed - get noticed. Randels is a kid who got noticed because he's good, not because he paid his way onto anything. You don't get signed by Penn State if you're not one of the best in the country. There's definitely some paying your way through some of this when kids are younger (travels teams, etc) but not when you get to the level of a Randels and playing for a team like Penn State, that's all based on being good. IL is pure in how they do things. They wouldn't have been around for a long as they have if there were anything other.

Playing for Penn State? He may be committed, but that’s a long way from playing. Benchwarmer and practice JAG at best- far too small to get significant playing time.

I predict a year there and portal to a D3 in year 2.

Anonymous wrote:Ha. There are paid evals with IL and then there are pure ratings and evals done from event performances where IL scouts are there. Guys who are good enough to get noticed - get noticed. Randels is a kid who got noticed because he's good, not because he paid his way onto anything. You don't get signed by Penn State if you're not one of the best in the country. There's definitely some paying your way through some of this when kids are younger (travels teams, etc) but not when you get to the level of a Randels and playing for a team like Penn State, that's all based on being good. IL is pure in how they do things. They wouldn't have been around for a long as they have if there were anything other.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:YT has the better offense and the best player on the field but it’s not a vast delta. FOGO maybe a push. Indy is vastly better everywhere else. If Indy plays undisciplined for too long early and the Refs call a tight game YT could get ahead and keep it interesting down to the wire. Otherwise this is a blowout Indy by 5+.

Best player on the field? I bet 2 Indy players individually have more points than 3.

Or in the Indy/YT fight here but if you think the stars mean much you are very mistaken.
When you pay for these things like you do with IL it cheapens it all.

Give me a break. Randles is a 4 star on IL and NLF and ranked top 40 in the class overall. Indy's guys are unranked low level D3 players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:YT has the better offense and the best player on the field but it’s not a vast delta. FOGO maybe a push. Indy is vastly better everywhere else. If Indy plays undisciplined for too long early and the Refs call a tight game YT could get ahead and keep it interesting down to the wire. Otherwise this is a blowout Indy by 5+.

Best player on the field? I bet 2 Indy players individually have more points than 3.

Or in the Indy/YT fight here but if you think the stars mean much you are very mistaken.
When you pay for these things like you do with IL it cheapens it all.

Give me a break. Randles is a 4 star on IL and NLF and ranked top 40 in the class overall. Indy's guys are unranked low level D3 players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Indy and Yorktown on paper is a similar match up top Indy Stone bridge. Stonebridge and Yorktown have similar offensive fire power and solid poles but no faceoff and a below average goalie.

Indy is 5-7 goals better but it could be close like the Stone bridge game was. It all depends on how often and how long Indy is man down for. High potential for late game issues in this one, especially if it's a blow out.

Stone Bridge D and goal is much better than YT. I am bias as a SB parent.

Having watched both, Indy live and YT on stream. I don’t think YT will know what is waiting for them.

Much better? The team that gave up 17 goals to Langley?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:YT has the better offense and the best player on the field but it’s not a vast delta. FOGO maybe a push. Indy is vastly better everywhere else. If Indy plays undisciplined for too long early and the Refs call a tight game YT could get ahead and keep it interesting down to the wire. Otherwise this is a blowout Indy by 5+.

Best player on the field? I bet 2 Indy players individually have more points than 3.

Randles has 142 points this year

And much against weak teams. What did he do against Madison?
Maybe little guy cant hold up for a whole season? It happens.