Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s funny Woodson had anyone from D getting all state when they gave up 15 to Madison.
No offense and honest question, but how does a team like Freedom get 3 offensive players on the state team, averaging 11pts/g in a bad region (except for BF)? In fact, BF blew them out 21-3 at regions.
The coach's DD is one of the 3 players from FSR so that should answer everything you need to know. FSR didn't even play in the District championship and then got blown out by BF as mentioned. FSR is glad they are moving out of Class 6 because they can't compete.
No bias there whatsoever... How can a coach even being allowed to nominate his own DD. What a giant conflict of interest.
Alright idiots. Coaches can be parent coaches too. Why should a parent not be able to coach his/her daughter’s team especially if they coached before their kid plays for them? In the past PVI, Robinson, Chantilly, Flint Hill, Madison, Riverside, Battlefield all had Coaches who’s daughter(s) also played for their program. It puts them in a tough position if their kid is a strong player/starter because everyone will throw the “that’s the coaches kid” card out there. I bet no one would complain if their kid sucked and never played or started. People just want something to complain about because they are butt hurt their kid didn’t get recognition over a coach whose daughter did. Stop playing the pity card and tell your kid to put more effort in their game during the off season if they want to be the best.
The only idiot here is you. There is only 1 Freedom player deserving of recognition and it is not the head coaches' kid. The coaches' kid is the one that should put more effort in their game and work harder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s funny Woodson had anyone from D getting all state when they gave up 15 to Madison.
No offense and honest question, but how does a team like Freedom get 3 offensive players on the state team, averaging 11pts/g in a bad region (except for BF)? In fact, BF blew them out 21-3 at regions.
The coach's DD is one of the 3 players from FSR so that should answer everything you need to know. FSR didn't even play in the District championship and then got blown out by BF as mentioned. FSR is glad they are moving out of Class 6 because they can't compete.
No bias there whatsoever... How can a coach even being allowed to nominate his own DD. What a giant conflict of interest.
Alright idiots. Coaches can be parent coaches too. Why should a parent not be able to coach his/her daughter’s team especially if they coached before their kid plays for them? In the past PVI, Robinson, Chantilly, Flint Hill, Madison, Riverside, Battlefield all had Coaches who’s daughter(s) also played for their program. It puts them in a tough position if their kid is a strong player/starter because everyone will throw the “that’s the coaches kid” card out there. I bet no one would complain if their kid sucked and never played or started. People just want something to complain about because they are butt hurt their kid didn’t get recognition over a coach whose daughter did. Stop playing the pity card and tell your kid to put more effort in their game during the off season if they want to be the best.
Which region?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The latter is the same process as All Region voting. And the former, All State candidates are automatically everybody's 1st team All Region players. Nobody is "nominating them" from "all coaches". All Region selections are voted on by the coaches who made regions, from All District 1st team selections.Anonymous wrote:All state voting is a lot different than district and region voting. All coaches can nominate their players that made first team all region but ONLY the coaches who’s team made the state tournament can vote on the all state team. Basically if you make states your coach has a better chance of getting their players in
Why do people keep coming on here to describe it when they have no idea how it works?
Not true. Every coach in the region gets to vote regardless of if their players make first team all region so you’re the one who apparently doesn’t have a clue on how it works. Yes I’ve heard from our coach that not every region coach shows up but they’d have a vote if they did. In states only the 8 coaches who made states get to vote so 2 coaches represent each region.
Anonymous wrote:The latter is the same process as All Region voting. And the former, All State candidates are automatically everybody's 1st team All Region players. Nobody is "nominating them" from "all coaches". All Region selections are voted on by the coaches who made regions, from All District 1st team selections.Anonymous wrote:All state voting is a lot different than district and region voting. All coaches can nominate their players that made first team all region but ONLY the coaches who’s team made the state tournament can vote on the all state team. Basically if you make states your coach has a better chance of getting their players in
Why do people keep coming on here to describe it when they have no idea how it works?
It's just one or 2 idiots.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s funny Woodson had anyone from D getting all state when they gave up 15 to Madison.
No offense and honest question, but how does a team like Freedom get 3 offensive players on the state team, averaging 11pts/g in a bad region (except for BF)? In fact, BF blew them out 21-3 at regions.
The coach's DD is one of the 3 players from FSR so that should answer everything you need to know. FSR didn't even play in the District championship and then got blown out by BF as mentioned. FSR is glad they are moving out of Class 6 because they can't compete.
No bias there whatsoever... How can a coach even being allowed to nominate his own DD. What a giant conflict of interest.
Alright idiots. Coaches can be parent coaches too. Why should a parent not be able to coach his/her daughter’s team especially if they coached before their kid plays for them? In the past PVI, Robinson, Chantilly, Flint Hill, Madison, Riverside, Battlefield all had Coaches who’s daughter(s) also played for their program. It puts them in a tough position if their kid is a strong player/starter because everyone will throw the “that’s the coaches kid” card out there. I bet no one would complain if their kid sucked and never played or started. People just want something to complain about because they are butt hurt their kid didn’t get recognition over a coach whose daughter did. Stop playing the pity card and tell your kid to put more effort in their game during the off season if they want to be the best.
The latter is the same process as All Region voting. And the former, All State candidates are automatically everybody's 1st team All Region players. Nobody is "nominating them" from "all coaches". All Region selections are voted on by the coaches who made regions, from All District 1st team selections.Anonymous wrote:All state voting is a lot different than district and region voting. All coaches can nominate their players that made first team all region but ONLY the coaches who’s team made the state tournament can vote on the all state team. Basically if you make states your coach has a better chance of getting their players in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s funny Woodson had anyone from D getting all state when they gave up 15 to Madison.
No offense and honest question, but how does a team like Freedom get 3 offensive players on the state team, averaging 11pts/g in a bad region (except for BF)? In fact, BF blew them out 21-3 at regions.
The coach's DD is one of the 3 players from FSR so that should answer everything you need to know. FSR didn't even play in the District championship and then got blown out by BF as mentioned. FSR is glad they are moving out of Class 6 because they can't compete.
No bias there whatsoever... How can a coach even being allowed to nominate his own DD. What a giant conflict of interest.
Alright idiots. Coaches can be parent coaches too. Why should a parent not be able to coach his/her daughter’s team especially if they coached before their kid plays for them? In the past PVI, Robinson, Chantilly, Flint Hill, Madison, Riverside, Battlefield all had Coaches who’s daughter(s) also played for their program. It puts them in a tough position if their kid is a strong player/starter because everyone will throw the “that’s the coaches kid” card out there. I bet no one would complain if their kid sucked and never played or started. People just want something to complain about because they are butt hurt their kid didn’t get recognition over a coach whose daughter did. Stop playing the pity card and tell your kid to put more effort in their game during the off season if they want to be the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s funny Woodson had anyone from D getting all state when they gave up 15 to Madison.
No offense and honest question, but how does a team like Freedom get 3 offensive players on the state team, averaging 11pts/g in a bad region (except for BF)? In fact, BF blew them out 21-3 at regions.
The coach's DD is one of the 3 players from FSR so that should answer everything you need to know. FSR didn't even play in the District championship and then got blown out by BF as mentioned. FSR is glad they are moving out of Class 6 because they can't compete.
No bias there whatsoever... How can a coach even being allowed to nominate his own DD. What a giant conflict of interest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2nd Team by Region
Region A 2
Region B 6
Region C 4
Region D 1
I think it is odd to see that Region D has 12 first teamers and only 1 second-teamer....
Anonymous wrote:Coach Mike S would never let these shenanigans happen with parent coach voting. Immediate air horn to coaches face. #wewantmike