Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You only get one bite at the apple in undercover journalism and Ngo's bite at the Antifa apple already burned to a crisp long ago. He's been antagonizing them for the last 2-3 years already and they know who he is.

Only a moron would think you can keep going to the same swamp to kick the same alligators over and over and not eventually get bitten.

Andy Ngo showed us he is that moron.

See, when you use the word “antagonizing” to describe the actions of one person who is merely taking and posting pictures of criminal activity, you lose all credibility. Especially when you compare that to the ACTUAL antagonizing done by antifa thugs.

He’s not “MERELY” doing anything. You are missing the point of this entire thread. And are also lacking credibility. Just like Ngo. Quillette fired him, FFS.

And yet... from your own link:

Quillette's editor-in-chief Claire Lehmann pushed back on the claim that Ngo's termination was a result of the video being published, saying he had been "off work" since July "after sustaining a traumatic brain injury."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You only get one bite at the apple in undercover journalism and Ngo's bite at the Antifa apple already burned to a crisp long ago. He's been antagonizing them for the last 2-3 years already and they know who he is.

Only a moron would think you can keep going to the same swamp to kick the same alligators over and over and not eventually get bitten.

Andy Ngo showed us he is that moron.

See, when you use the word “antagonizing” to describe the actions of one person who is merely taking and posting pictures of criminal activity, you lose all credibility. Especially when you compare that to the ACTUAL antagonizing done by antifa thugs.

He’s not “MERELY” doing anything. You are missing the point of this entire thread. And are also lacking credibility. Just like Ngo. Quillette fired him, FFS.

The nerve of this guy! If you are cancelled, you are not supposed to find another job and do the same thing there. Doesn't he know that???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You only get one bite at the apple in undercover journalism and Ngo's bite at the Antifa apple already burned to a crisp long ago. He's been antagonizing them for the last 2-3 years already and they know who he is.

Only a moron would think you can keep going to the same swamp to kick the same alligators over and over and not eventually get bitten.

Andy Ngo showed us he is that moron.

See, when you use the word “antagonizing” to describe the actions of one person who is merely taking and posting pictures of criminal activity, you lose all credibility. Especially when you compare that to the ACTUAL antagonizing done by antifa thugs.

He’s not “MERELY” doing anything. You are missing the point of this entire thread. And are also lacking credibility. Just like Ngo. Quillette fired him, FFS.

Anonymous wrote:You only get one bite at the apple in undercover journalism and Ngo's bite at the Antifa apple already burned to a crisp long ago. He's been antagonizing them for the last 2-3 years already and they know who he is.

Only a moron would think you can keep going to the same swamp to kick the same alligators over and over and not eventually get bitten.

Andy Ngo showed us he is that moron.

See, when you use the word “antagonizing” to describe the actions of one person who is merely taking and posting pictures of criminal activity, you lose all credibility. Especially when you compare that to the ACTUAL antagonizing done by antifa thugs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Meh. If he focused on exposing PBs (but not antifa), you’d be giddy with glee. Sorry, can’t take your “criticisms” seriously.
DP

He does much worse than "not focusing on" PB's. He hangs out with PB's, feeds them information, and is a Proud Boy sympathizer. When Proud Boys are committing criminal violent and destructive acts in front of him he turns the camera off. NO honest journalist does that.

Unlike all those other reporters, who roll their cameras 24/7, and show you all of it, on live feed. They are so honest to make sure they catch all of it.

Exactly. PP is a delusional partisan who wants everyone to fall for her ridiculous narrative that journalists on the left are so very neutral and honest. Riiight.

You only get one bite at the apple in undercover journalism and Ngo's bite at the Antifa apple already burned to a crisp long ago. He's been antagonizing them for the last 2-3 years already and they know who he is.

Only a moron would think you can keep going to the same swamp to kick the same alligators over and over and not eventually get bitten.

Andy Ngo showed us he is that moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Meh. If he focused on exposing PBs (but not antifa), you’d be giddy with glee. Sorry, can’t take your “criticisms” seriously.
DP

He does much worse than "not focusing on" PB's. He hangs out with PB's, feeds them information, and is a Proud Boy sympathizer. When Proud Boys are committing criminal violent and destructive acts in front of him he turns the camera off. NO honest journalist does that.

Unlike all those other reporters, who roll their cameras 24/7, and show you all of it, on live feed. They are so honest to make sure they catch all of it.

Yes, as a matter of fact there are plenty of other journalists covering street protests. In fact Andy Ngo gets many of the photos and videos that he publishes from others. The fact that you don't know this just makes you look naive.

But many of the other on-the-ground journos covering street violence think Andy Ngo is an idiot. Take Tim Pool for example - he got his start years before Ngo, covering the Occupy movement but then also did things like look into "no go" areas in Europe, went to Venezuela to cover what was going on there as well. Pool and many others don't try to play games with the folks they are covering like wearing Antifa cosplay and skulk around as Ngo did, and they bring security. But not Ngo. Tim Pool's reaction was "WTF is Ngo thinking" - Ngo can't get within 50 feet of those folks in Portland because they know who he is. He CANNOT "go undercover" because of that. Sheer stupidity of Ngo to think he could dress up in black bloc and "infiltrate" a group that knows exactly who he is and can spot him from a distance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Meh. If he focused on exposing PBs (but not antifa), you’d be giddy with glee. Sorry, can’t take your “criticisms” seriously.
DP

He does much worse than "not focusing on" PB's. He hangs out with PB's, feeds them information, and is a Proud Boy sympathizer. When Proud Boys are committing criminal violent and destructive acts in front of him he turns the camera off. NO honest journalist does that.

Unlike all those other reporters, who roll their cameras 24/7, and show you all of it, on live feed. They are so honest to make sure they catch all of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Meh. If he focused on exposing PBs (but not antifa), you’d be giddy with glee. Sorry, can’t take your “criticisms” seriously.
DP

He does much worse than "not focusing on" PB's. He hangs out with PB's, feeds them information, and is a Proud Boy sympathizer. When Proud Boys are committing criminal violent and destructive acts in front of him he turns the camera off. NO honest journalist does that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Meh. If he focused on exposing PBs (but not antifa), you’d be giddy with glee. Sorry, can’t take your “criticisms” seriously.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

You just want to control him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.

Meh, not really. He "focuses" (if you want to call it that) on anyone on the left to protest for any reason whatsoever and then indiscriminately just lumps them all together into some generic "BLAMTIFA" bucket. For someone who's theoretically been "investigating" them for the last several years you'd think he'd at least have a more nuanced take on it, but no - to him everyone is "Antifa" including any Tom Dick and Harriet homeless person or meth head to get arrested in Multnomah County because he'll then post their mugshots and claim they are "Antifa."

Only the finest people.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2021/06/02/malik-muhammad-case-indy-activist-federally-charged-portland-protests/7505290002/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

DP. Yes. The PP most certainly does deny these facts, and wants to be sure anyone discussing these facts is discredited. That’s the PP’s narrative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is it possible that everyone who doesn’t buy NGo’s glass narrative is an antifa sympathizer?

The same way that everyone who thinks it's okay for Ngo to take pictures at a public event is a right wing lunatic.

+100

He’s not just taking pictures. He’s selling a narrative.

The videos and pictures speak for themselves.
Do you deny that there are a number of anarchists/antifa causing destruction in Portland nearly every night for the past year?

I’m not denying that there are anarchists causing trouble, and breaking the law. I’m denying that antifa is trying to take over the country. I am denying Andy Ngo’s victim narrative. Plenty of real journalists were injured by the police last year. Did Ngo cover any of that? Seems counter to his mission of uncovering antifa.

Not to mention why only focus on Antifa? Why not Patriot Prayer or Proud Boys or other extremist groups who've engaged in street violence, vandalism and destruction?

He focuses on BLM, too.