Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
DP, but how so?
Look at this exchange. I expressed the opinion that cancelling fancy dress balls has no measurable impact on the exploitation of one group by another. That's all I did. But holding that opinion was all that was needed to consider me racist, even though the balls don't affect, except emotionally. Many people think that's racist because it is telling other races how they must think and how they must behave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
You have no f-ing clue what "racist" even means, do you?
There is more than one definition. The definition is disputed these days. You can go out and verify that for yourself. I don't think I'm racist or ignorant. You can call me those names all you want, but don't be surprised if someone calls you those names right back.
So you call people racist because.....they called you racist? Not because you actually think they are racist? Is that the logic here?
RWNJs have been doing this for years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
You have no f-ing clue what "racist" even means, do you?
There is more than one definition. The definition is disputed these days. You can go out and verify that for yourself. I don't think I'm racist or ignorant. You can call me those names all you want, but don't be surprised if someone calls you those names right back.
So you call people racist because.....they called you racist? Not because you actually think they are racist? Is that the logic here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
You have no f-ing clue what "racist" even means, do you?
There is more than one definition. The definition is disputed these days. You can go out and verify that for yourself. I don't think I'm racist or ignorant. You can call me those names all you want, but don't be surprised if someone calls you those names right back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
You have no f-ing clue what "racist" even means, do you?
There is more than one definition. The definition is disputed these days. You can go out and verify that for yourself. I don't think I'm racist or ignorant. You can call me those names all you want, but don't be surprised if someone calls you those names right back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
DP, but how so?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Be aware that many people think your definition of racism is itself racist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it that nuance isn't really your thing
DP. Nor is it yours. Nor do you seem aware that HBO pulled Gone with the Wind for it's racism until people complained and they put it back with contextual explainers for how it ignores the horrors of slavery. Which is a fine solution to me, but if that works, why can't I dress like Scarlet O'Hara at a party without endorsing either greed or racism?
Well, you can, but why would you?
Thank you for your permission to exercise my free will. Please provide photos of your entire wardrobe and let me ask you why you want to wear those things. If I don't like your choices, I will call you names.
Are you going to go around at the party and explain how the character of Scarlet O'Hara ignores and benefits from the horrors of slavery?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
![]()
I give up. But be aware that when people call you racist, it’s not without merit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it that nuance isn't really your thing
DP. Nor is it yours. Nor do you seem aware that HBO pulled Gone with the Wind for it's racism until people complained and they put it back with contextual explainers for how it ignores the horrors of slavery. Which is a fine solution to me, but if that works, why can't I dress like Scarlet O'Hara at a party without endorsing either greed or racism?
Well, you can, but why would you?
Thank you for your permission to exercise my free will. Please provide photos of your entire wardrobe and let me ask you why you want to wear those things. If I don't like your choices, I will call you names.
I have a sexy Hitler/SS officer mini-dress. Should I wear that to a party?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no history without the history of exploitation of one group by another. None. It still happens today around the world.
So your answer is we should celebrate exploitation with fancy dress balls?
The answer is that cancelling the balls is not an answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it that nuance isn't really your thing
DP. Nor is it yours. Nor do you seem aware that HBO pulled Gone with the Wind for it's racism until people complained and they put it back with contextual explainers for how it ignores the horrors of slavery. Which is a fine solution to me, but if that works, why can't I dress like Scarlet O'Hara at a party without endorsing either greed or racism?
Well, you can, but why would you?
Thank you for your permission to exercise my free will. Please provide photos of your entire wardrobe and let me ask you why you want to wear those things. If I don't like your choices, I will call you names.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it that nuance isn't really your thing
DP. Nor is it yours. Nor do you seem aware that HBO pulled Gone with the Wind for it's racism until people complained and they put it back with contextual explainers for how it ignores the horrors of slavery. Which is a fine solution to me, but if that works, why can't I dress like Scarlet O'Hara at a party without endorsing either greed or racism?
Well, you can, but why would you?
Thank you for your permission to exercise my free will. Please provide photos of your entire wardrobe and let me ask you why you want to wear those things. If I don't like your choices, I will call you names.