ya, it is the party of reality TV and Geraldo Rivera. Whether rich or poor, white or occasionally black/hispanic, male or female, they are in favor of lots of sex, lots of screaming, bullying, lots of theatrical emotions, lots of shock, magic, voodoo. They have no respect for truth, decency, modesty, empathy. They are the direct opposite of the old "strong silent man".

Anonymous wrote:The DailyMail is going hard after MTG

EXCLUSIVE: Embattled QAnon congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene 'openly cheated' on her husband of 25 years with a polyamorous tantric sex guru and then moved on to another affair with the manager at her gym
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9246917/amp/Marjorie-Taylor-Green-openly-cheated-husband-men-gym.html

[twitter] https://mobile.twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1359952729653714945[/twitter]

oh dear family values

Anonymous wrote:Of course she is articulate. This whole thing is a game for the GOP to suck more people into the lies and create division with those on Earth 1.0.

She’s not articulate. She’s deathly afraid of a “cabal” and yet can’t even pronounce the word.

The DailyMail is going hard after MTG

EXCLUSIVE: Embattled QAnon congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene 'openly cheated' on her husband of 25 years with a polyamorous tantric sex guru and then moved on to another affair with the manager at her gym
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9246917/amp/Marjorie-Taylor-Green-openly-cheated-husband-men-gym.html

[twitter] https://mobile.twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1359952729653714945[/twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh big surprise Greene has been lying about her origin story all along. Those of you who think AOC has been a dram Queen should read this.

Liars, cheaters, thieves, traitors.

Interesting to see the news stories. This one from Daily Mail is misleading--at least as to what Greene said yesterday. She did use the term "hostage" but never said she waa "held at gunpoint" which is what the Mail article says. Good way to twist facts. She should have used the term "lockdown" for her experience--but, some kids were held hostage apparently.

And, let's not forget that David Hogg was in a totally different building at Parkland and did not see the shootings at all Parkland was terrible and horrific, and I believe Hogg is sincere, but he was not near the danger himself.
There were lots of things that went wrong at Parkland:

A kid who was known to be dangerous but slipped through the cracks because of political correctness and laws which protect troubled youth more than the youth at large.
School personnel who saw him arrive, knew he was not to be there, and stood by.
A School Resource Officer who was a coward.
A sheriff who was incompetent.

Thank goodness for the nearby police officers from a different jurisdiction who were not in charge, but stepped in to finally bring an end to the carnage.

It appears that in Greene's story, good people did step forward to stop shootings even though they had no weapon.

Unlike the Newsweek article which exaggerated AOC's story to make it appear that she was in grave danger and make the story more important, the Daily Mail article tries to diminish Greene's story and make her look even worse.



Interesting.

Having your schoolmate held hostage by a gunman for 5 hours is absolutely a traumatizing experience. But it’s not the same level of trauma as having numerous schoolmates and teachers riddled with bullets and mowed down in a chaotic shooting spree. Nor does it give you the moral license to harassp a teenager whose friends died in a bloody massacre. She is shameless.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here will find footage of her saying it.

She said it on the house floor. You can go to C-Span to see it.

Shows how much you know. It was not on the House floor. So, you must not have listened or read what she said.

What speech are you talking about? Maybe you saw a different speech.

She gave one outside the House with questions.

I did not realize she spoke about it on the House floor. Her statement on the house floor that the kid with the gun "took the school hostage and this happened right down the hall from my classroom." Sounds to me like the story was pretty accurate if you listen to what she said.
Again, I find her past extremely troubling. But, the Mail article misrepresented her words.
I do find her surprisingly articulate. I have no idea if she has dropped QAnon or not, she says she has. Her speech was good, though. There is a lot to attack her on, but the story about the kid int he school is not one of them.

So basically you implied someone else was dumb or didn’t have all the information, when you were the one who hadn’t watched or listened to the speech people were referencing and that has been all over the news. Then you misquote the speech to make it seem accurate, and call it a good speech, while admitting you’re not sure if she means what she says.

You misquoted by saying she said he “took the school hostage and this happened right down the hall from my classroom.” Her quote was that he took “the entire school hostage” which definitely implies she was a hostage. At least if she’s at the school, and the entire school is being held hostage, those words mean she was a hostage. Then she says it happened down the hall from her classroom, which makes the whole thing a little muddy, because how did she get taken hostage if she wasn’t in the room with the hostage taker? At any rate, it doesn’t matter, because school officials and news reports say he took a smaller number of students hostage, not the whole school. This isn’t to diminish or minimize her experience. I’m sure it was scary for the teachers, staff, and the students and their families. I can’t imagine being in that situation. However, words have meanings. What she says doesn’t match up to what was reported, yet she was loud and proud when she called out David Hogg and harassed him.

Also, while she usually pronounces words correctly and sometimes uses words with clear meanings, although the order she puts them in makes her sentences false, I wouldn’t call her articulate. Especially in that speech. She was accused of saying things like Sandy Hook and Parkland shootings were false flag operations. She refuted that by saying school shootings definitely happen. She said there was no evidence that a plane crashed into the pentagon on 9/11. She refuted that by saying 9/11 happened. She also said she “was allowed to believe” in things that weren’t true. She couldn’t even take responsibility and say she believed things that weren’t true.

Not a good speech if you’re paying attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/elections/fl-ne-marjorie-taylor-greene-harass-david-hogg-20210127-wbgdvy4ydvdvzcyn6u4yzu3v7y-story.html

Video of her harassing David Hogg.

She really is despicable.

I read she was obsessed with SoulCycle before Q.

She has that personality that gets obsessed with things.

She is mean and lacks empathy.

Anonymous wrote:Of course she is articulate. This whole thing is a game for the GOP to suck more people into the lies and create division with those on Earth 1.0.

Yes, this fing imbecile who believes Hillary Clinton murdered a child to drink her blood. I'm angry that none of us stood up and fought this crap back then. People just assumed the worst. These cretins are obsessed with powerful democratic women. It is beyond toxic and bodes for a terrifying future for women..

Of course she is articulate. This whole thing is a game for the GOP to suck more people into the lies and create division with those on Earth 1.0.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here will find footage of her saying it.

She said it on the house floor. You can go to C-Span to see it.

Shows how much you know. It was not on the House floor. So, you must not have listened or read what she said.

What speech are you talking about? Maybe you saw a different speech.

She gave one outside the House with questions.

I did not realize she spoke about it on the House floor. Her statement on the house floor that the kid with the gun "took the school hostage and this happened right down the hall from my classroom." Sounds to me like the story was pretty accurate if you listen to what she said.
Again, I find her past extremely troubling. But, the Mail article misrepresented her words.
I do find her surprisingly articulate. I have no idea if she has dropped QAnon or not, she says she has. Her speech was good, though. There is a lot to attack her on, but the story about the kid int he school is not one of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone here will find footage of her saying it.

She said it on the house floor. You can go to C-Span to see it.

Shows how much you know. It was not on the House floor. So, you must not have listened or read what she said.

What speech are you talking about? Maybe you saw a different speech.

Anonymous wrote:Someone here will find footage of her saying it.

It's all over FB and Twitter not hard to find.

And in the cloud super easy for anyone with half a brain.

Anonymous wrote:let's not cry any tears about greene being the victim of the media.

the problem is that greene is the one out there making unclear comments about being a victim of a school shooting because she had to somehow try to backpedal from harassing a kid.

she's the one trying to put herself on par with david hogg to excuse the fact that she followed him around, screaming abusive crazy at him.

+1

let's not cry any tears about greene being the victim of the media.

the problem is that greene is the one out there making unclear comments about being a victim of a school shooting because she had to somehow try to backpedal from harassing a kid.

she's the one trying to put herself on par with david hogg to excuse the fact that she followed him around, screaming abusive crazy at him.