Anonymous wrote:Why don't we combine DC with MoCo, PG, Arlington and Fairfax County into a state? That would give it a combined population enough to justify being a state.
And as bait to the Republicans, it'd mean both the rest of Virginia and even Maryland suddenly turn much more reddish.
Balances things out all around.
Now lets see how the partisans gleefully rubbing their hands at the prospect of two more Dem senate seats react to this....as that will tell you everything you need to know.
Anonymous wrote:I am 100% for DC statehood and Home Rule.
It isn’t fair that the district should be run by fat cats all the way in...Washington!
Anonymous wrote:If DC was conservative, Republicans would vote to elevate it in a heartbeat
Anonymous wrote:Why stop there? Time to make Samoa, US Virgins, Guam,and Puerto Rico states too right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too small to be a state. Can't have 2 senators representing such a small number of people.
I don't believe in taxation without representation. So, DC residents should not have to pay federal taxes. They should be treated no differently then Puerto Rico.
DC residents should not have to pay federal tax, should not be subject a national draft, should have free college for all residents, and should have medicare for all residents, regardless of age/income - or make them a state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too small to be a state. Can't have 2 senators representing such a small number of people.
I don't believe in taxation without representation. So, DC residents should not have to pay federal taxes. They should be treated no differently then Puerto Rico.
Except Vermont and Wyoming have fewer people and both have senators. And DC will soon have more residents than Alaska.
Nah. People are leaving DC because of The Virus
Anonymous wrote:Too small to be a state. Can't have 2 senators representing such a small number of people.
I don't believe in taxation without representation. So, DC residents should not have to pay federal taxes. They should be treated no differently then Puerto Rico.
Anonymous wrote:Too small to be a state. Can't have 2 senators representing such a small number of people.
I don't believe in taxation without representation. So, DC residents should not have to pay federal taxes. They should be treated no differently then Puerto Rico.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in DC is a choice.
If you want a state, then there are two to choose from next door.
Missing the point is a choice, too. As is believing that taxation without representation is fine.
Then move. It’s not rocket science.
DC is not going to become a state anytime soon.
I don't live in DC. Also, I don't support taxation without representation. Which is why I support DC statehood.
Would you support Dallas statehood?
The Dallas metro area has 7.2 million people, which is more than at least 35 states. If people in the Dallas metro area want statehood for Dallas, sure, I don't have a problem with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in DC is a choice.
If you want a state, then there are two to choose from next door.
Missing the point is a choice, too. As is believing that taxation without representation is fine.
Then move. It’s not rocket science.
DC is not going to become a state anytime soon.
I don't live in DC. Also, I don't support taxation without representation. Which is why I support DC statehood.
Would you support Dallas statehood?