Anonymous wrote:New York Times issues correction on Kavanaugh story
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/media/461530-new-york-times-issues-correction-on-kavanaugh-story%3famp
The New York Times on Monday added a correction to a report accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
The correction notes that the woman allegedly involved in the incident with Kavanaugh during law school does not recall it.
The Times in the story published Saturday reported a former classmate of Kavanaugh's named Max Stier said he witnessed the now-judge expose himself and force another female classmate to touch his penis at a dorm party. The Times said it corroborated the story with two other officials who had heard the same report from the former classmate, Stier.
However, the woman involved in the alleged incident did not speak to the Times and, according to the correction, her friends say she does not recall that it happened.
#fakenews
#NYSlimes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Damn.
The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.
Unbelievable!!
Wow. This makes the NYT look awful.
The NYT *is* awful. I was impressed to see that today’s WSJ didn’t stoop down to their level. No coverage at all of the recent idiotic claim.
Finally, threw in the towel and cancelled my NYT subscription. The WSJ stands alone for US papers. Otherwise, I will read the international
Press
Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.
Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Damn.
The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.
Unbelievable!!
Wow. This makes the NYT look awful.
The NYT *is* awful. I was impressed to see that today’s WSJ didn’t stoop down to their level. No coverage at all of the recent idiotic claim.
Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?
I wish. Seems like a great guy.
It seems he selects women not in the “in group,” so I can see wanting your daughter to be protected. Personally I’d keep my kids far, far away from suspected predators, but you do you.
“Suspected predator”? You sound like a disgusting person.
Anonymous wrote:New York Times issues correction on Kavanaugh story
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/media/461530-new-york-times-issues-correction-on-kavanaugh-story%3famp
The New York Times on Monday added a correction to a report accusing Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
The correction notes that the woman allegedly involved in the incident with Kavanaugh during law school does not recall it.
The Times in the story published Saturday reported a former classmate of Kavanaugh's named Max Stier said he witnessed the now-judge expose himself and force another female classmate to touch his penis at a dorm party. The Times said it corroborated the story with two other officials who had heard the same report from the former classmate, Stier.
However, the woman involved in the alleged incident did not speak to the Times and, according to the correction, her friends say she does not recall that it happened.
#fakenews
#NYSlimes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So did we find out who paid Kavanaugh's debts before confirmation?
Nope. And we never will.
Ah, one false narrative blown out of the water, so you have to fall back on the other. Too funny (and predictable).
No, it's all the same story. BK was never truly investigated. The GOP forced in a undesirable candidate because they could.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?
I wish. Seems like a great guy.
It seems he selects women not in the “in group,” so I can see wanting your daughter to be protected. Personally I’d keep my kids far, far away from suspected predators, but you do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
1. This is not my daughter. My daughter would not wait 30 years.
2. If my daughter was unable to present details (like the date, place, time) or even state that something actually happened and confidently identify the perpetrator, I would not make accusations against someone.
3. There is a reason her parents have said they supported the confirmation of Kavanaugh.
1.![]()
2. And I’m sure if this was your daughter, you’d do a little reading and realize that for some women the details are sketchy. Fight or flight hormones are a hell of a drug. There are actual studies on this. There are actual studies on the forgetting of sexual trauma and assault.
3. Yeah, no one ever allied with those with power and there’s certainly not a whiff of the patriarchy about that. Complete ashhat move by the dad, by the way. If my father undercut me that way, I would never speak to him again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow - so many BK fan girls. Is he your DD's coach?
I wish. Seems like a great guy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
1. This is not my daughter. My daughter would not wait 30 years.
2. If my daughter was unable to present details (like the date, place, time) or even state that something actually happened and confidently identify the perpetrator, I would not make accusations against someone.
3. There is a reason her parents have said they supported the confirmation of Kavanaugh.
1.![]()
2. And I’m sure if this was your daughter, you’d do a little reading and realize that for some women the details are sketchy. Fight or flight hormones are a hell of a drug. There are actual studies on this. There are actual studies on the forgetting of sexual trauma and assault.
3. Yeah, no one ever allied with those with power and there’s certainly not a whiff of the patriarchy about that. Complete ashhat move by the dad, by the way. If my father undercut me that way, I would never speak to him again.