Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
You can’t opt out of your race, unless you want to be assumed white or Asian and receive a penalty.
Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
Why would you want to opt out? A score that says your child has no adversity isn’t a mark against them. You are acting like it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey W school parents,
Sorry that my kids' poverty infected gangland schools are taking all of the ivy league spots with this new system!!
$$DCC RePreZeNT$$
Sure does.
That is why I don't plan to hire any Ivy grads who entered after this year and majored in fluffy majors. I don't need entitled, sob story dorks at my company. Companies that need workers to actually do work, as opposed to RePreZeNT the diversity / adversity angle, will hire students who attend state school honors colleges and do well in hard majors. Several consulting companies and defense contractors in DMV have already informally made it their policy.
Harvard athlete URM first generation adversity poster kids can go work in politics or some other dumpster field where productivity means nothing, there is no output anyone actually needs, and workers are there for show and veiled money laundering.
If Ivies screw us, we screw the Ivies. Right now, the power balance is not right and they cannot feel it. In a few years, that will change.
LOL- yes, show your POWER! The ivy's need to see it and learn to OBEY![]()
A death by a 1000 papercuts is still a death.
Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
Anonymous wrote:The only way this can work is to make it OPTIONAL. Plenty of people will want to report their neighborhood adversity score, and plenty won't. It is profiling and just as disclosing your race is optional and applicants have strict control over what they wish to present in their applications (even teacher recs--you can opt to see them but of course most would not), having a mark on your application which may be inaccurate and stereotyping should be something you can OPT OUT of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey W school parents,
Sorry that my kids' poverty infected gangland schools are taking all of the ivy league spots with this new system!!
$$DCC RePreZeNT$$
Sure does.
That is why I don't plan to hire any Ivy grads who entered after this year and majored in fluffy majors. I don't need entitled, sob story dorks at my company. Companies that need workers to actually do work, as opposed to RePreZeNT the diversity / adversity angle, will hire students who attend state school honors colleges and do well in hard majors. Several consulting companies and defense contractors in DMV have already informally made it their policy.
Harvard athlete URM first generation adversity poster kids can go work in politics or some other dumpster field where productivity means nothing, there is no output anyone actually needs, and workers are there for show and veiled money laundering.
If Ivies screw us, we screw the Ivies. Right now, the power balance is not right and they cannot feel it. In a few years, that will change.
LOL- yes, show your POWER! The ivy's need to see it and learn to OBEY![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can not believe how many of you affluent advantaged people are now online rallying against this. Have you no shame? As you no empathy? Have you no understanding? This is not designed to hurt your kids, but to help other kids.
Because it dumbs down our colleges and our country.
As opposed to the student athletes and legacies? Plus, it doesn't dumb down our country. The kids with the higher adversity scores will come out with a better education, and your smart/well prepared kid will continue to be smart well prepared. The other alternative dumbs fown the country by having a perpetual underclass of uneducated people. It might disadvantage your child because he has to go to a slightly lower ranked school, but it actually creates a more educated country overall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This type of social engineering is great. Enjoy George Mason, rich kids!
No enjoy George Mason middle class kids. The rich are still appealing to colleges because they are full pay. The middle class won't necessarily be full pay but they aren't poor enough to benefit from having a high adversity score.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey W school parents,
Sorry that my kids' poverty infected gangland schools are taking all of the ivy league spots with this new system!!
$$DCC RePreZeNT$$
Sure does.
That is why I don't plan to hire any Ivy grads who entered after this year and majored in fluffy majors. I don't need entitled, sob story dorks at my company. Companies that need workers to actually do work, as opposed to RePreZeNT the diversity / adversity angle, will hire students who attend state school honors colleges and do well in hard majors. Several consulting companies and defense contractors in DMV have already informally made it their policy.
Harvard athlete URM first generation adversity poster kids can go work in politics or some other dumpster field where productivity means nothing, there is no output anyone actually needs, and workers are there for show and veiled money laundering.
If Ivies screw us, we screw the Ivies. Right now, the power balance is not right and they cannot feel it. In a few years, that will change.