Anonymous wrote:My ex was AMAZING in bed and it makes me sad sometimes that I’ll never feel that way again.

My ears are burning!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your kids are the reason you no longer get invited to join group activities.

What's wrong with them? How old?

5 and 8. They’re just loud, obnoxious and scream-y, and don’t play well with others. The parents don’t do much about discipline so the other kids in the group don’t want to play with them. They make group get togethers chaotic so everyone is doing a slow fade and just not inviting them to things anymore.

Sounds like theyre boys and you have girls, LOL. Every get together I go to with boys gets loud.

You are correct, but there are other boys in the group who are not a problem. I don’t want to get too specific, but parenting (or lack of) matters.

I kind of hope you’re talking about my kids. Got an email today from the teacher saying what a wonderful kind child the older one is (I’m sure he’s the one you have a problem with). Yours have no hope with you. That is, if you are who I think you are.

[b]

Teacher was probably doing the sandwich approach. You’ll get another email soon. Parents like you suck because you can’t takw criticism and think you’re snowflakes can do no wrong. I see the kids who are 8 and have parents like you. They become he teens with problems.

- teacher

huh? If you're really a teacher, hopefully not an English one.

*your snowflakes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your kids are the reason you no longer get invited to join group activities.

What's wrong with them? How old?

5 and 8. They’re just loud, obnoxious and scream-y, and don’t play well with others. The parents don’t do much about discipline so the other kids in the group don’t want to play with them. They make group get togethers chaotic so everyone is doing a slow fade and just not inviting them to things anymore.

Sounds like theyre boys and you have girls, LOL. Every get together I go to with boys gets loud.

You are correct, but there are other boys in the group who are not a problem. I don’t want to get too specific, but parenting (or lack of) matters.

I kind of hope you’re talking about my kids. Got an email today from the teacher saying what a wonderful kind child the older one is (I’m sure he’s the one you have a problem with). Yours have no hope with you. That is, if you are who I think you are.

[b]

Teacher was probably doing the sandwich approach. You’ll get another email soon. Parents like you suck because you can’t takw criticism and think you’re snowflakes can do no wrong. I see the kids who are 8 and have parents like you. They become he teens with problems.

- teacher

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s a big cycle that starts with a wife losing interest in her husband. She becomes lonely and easily falls into bed with the first rando (not her DH) showing her some male attention.

But it’s NOT because her DH is a fat bald loser! Because this game works the same for her DH: he flirts with a married women (not his DW) and she falls right into bed with him.

It’s just that women are wired to lose interest in her husband, so she gets lonely while he goes elsewhere and you extrapolate this across an entire population... everybody is still having plenty of sex, just not with spouse!!

I think this is exactly true. I was FINE with fat DH until he stopped paying attention to me and our family (yeah, whatever, I don't want to hear it) and I fell (jumped, actually) into bed with the first rando loser who found me attractive.

But which came first? You lost all interest (in him) or he stopped paying attention? It has been well established that a man's "game" becomes ineffective over time for the same women. Meanwhile his exact same "game" can be wildly successful with other women (excepting his wife). Not to mention the requirements a woman has for her housemate husband are never a barrier for the rando dude who merely remarks that she's hot (drops panties).

At least it is equally easy for all to find satisfaction: just pick any married partner (not your spouse) and go.

To avoid the issue of losing interest, DH and I liberally use roleplay fantasies. We've done just about every fantasy (non-BDSM or things like that, but nearly always with a light sub/dom dynamic) and it really helps keep things interesting!

That’s awesome! Can offer some role play ideas? What was your favorite?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have slept with over 50 married women...

But can you name them all?

Some, but not all...

Lol, that's what I thought. But I secretly hoped for an answer like that song by The Nails:

https://genius.com/The-nails-88-lines-about-44-women-lyrics

Remembering the names of the 50 married women he banged sort of misses the whole point of the exercise.

1. When I saw the post, I thought of that song so I set myself up to get to post it.

2. You'd be surprised what some people remember but sometimes it's hard to remember what you never knew.

I can think of 2 occasions where I woke up in a bed and I had no idea what to call the person next to me. I think I remember those incidents from 30 years ago because of that fact. One I was lucky enough to be able to sneak out before she woke. The other I was able to fake my way through but I hated asking for that number knowing there was no way I'd ever call because I wouldn't know who to ask for but I thought it was the polite thing to do.

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been in a “relationship” for the past 3 years but am not in love nor am I attracted to him. I see him as more of a best friend but am scared of being lonely. I’m still not over my ex that I dated before getting into current relationship and am still holding onto hope that one day we’ll get back together.

You are on a path to misery. Get out now for your sake and for his.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have slept with over 50 married women...

Have you dedicated your life to this pursuit? Who has time for this? Please do an AMA

No, not at all. I didn’t make it a goal, it just happened. I spent my Summers living and working at the beach. A lot of out of town women for a girls weekend. They wanted to get away from DH and let it all go. No one forced them...

Ok, so in college working at a bar, going to the gym and grocery store and summers living and working at the beach you just rolled up on 50 married women looking to for some fuq. With those kind of numbers you'd have to be hitting up hundreds of women to land 50 that you'd actually have sex with.

If you think about it, think about a bartender at Secrets and a "girls weekend". There are a lot of fish in that barrel. The women are on the loose, drinking (some heavily) and they are looking to be noticed, for someone to let them know they are still hot. If some good looking guy that's 10-15 years younger is flirting back and then willing to come home with them, they think "ha, I still got it. That guy picked me over single girls his own age." not "shit, I just got used for sex and he picked me because I was desperate for the attention."

Something like that could get your number over 20 in a single summer (10 could get done without much effort) if you pushed it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have slept with over 50 married women...

But can you name them all?

Some, but not all...

Lol, that's what I thought. But I secretly hoped for an answer like that song by The Nails:

https://genius.com/The-nails-88-lines-about-44-women-lyrics

Remembering the names of the 50 married women he banged sort of misses the whole point of the exercise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have slept with over 50 married women...

But can you name them all?

Some, but not all...

Lol, that's what I thought. But I secretly hoped for an answer like that song by The Nails:

https://genius.com/The-nails-88-lines-about-44-women-lyrics

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s a big cycle that starts with a wife losing interest in her husband. She becomes lonely and easily falls into bed with the first rando (not her DH) showing her some male attention.

But it’s NOT because her DH is a fat bald loser! Because this game works the same for her DH: he flirts with a married women (not his DW) and she falls right into bed with him.

It’s just that women are wired to lose interest in her husband, so she gets lonely while he goes elsewhere and you extrapolate this across an entire population... everybody is still having plenty of sex, just not with spouse!!

I think this is exactly true. I was FINE with fat DH until he stopped paying attention to me and our family (yeah, whatever, I don't want to hear it) and I fell (jumped, actually) into bed with the first rando loser who found me attractive.

But which came first? You lost all interest (in him) or he stopped paying attention? It has been well established that a man's "game" becomes ineffective over time for the same women. Meanwhile his exact same "game" can be wildly successful with other women (excepting his wife). Not to mention the requirements a woman has for her housemate husband are never a barrier for the rando dude who merely remarks that she's hot (drops panties).

At least it is equally easy for all to find satisfaction: just pick any married partner (not your spouse) and go.

To avoid the issue of losing interest, DH and I liberally use roleplay fantasies. We've done just about every fantasy (non-BDSM or things like that, but nearly always with a light sub/dom dynamic) and it really helps keep things interesting!

Your husband is a lucky man because you took responsibility for that hard-wiring. Most women find it easier to blame the husband for something he has no control of and either cheat or condemn him to a nearly sexless marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s a big cycle that starts with a wife losing interest in her husband. She becomes lonely and easily falls into bed with the first rando (not her DH) showing her some male attention.

But it’s NOT because her DH is a fat bald loser! Because this game works the same for her DH: he flirts with a married women (not his DW) and she falls right into bed with him.

It’s just that women are wired to lose interest in her husband, so she gets lonely while he goes elsewhere and you extrapolate this across an entire population... everybody is still having plenty of sex, just not with spouse!!

I think this is exactly true. I was FINE with fat DH until he stopped paying attention to me and our family (yeah, whatever, I don't want to hear it) and I fell (jumped, actually) into bed with the first rando loser who found me attractive.

But which came first? You lost all interest (in him) or he stopped paying attention? It has been well established that a man's "game" becomes ineffective over time for the same women. Meanwhile his exact same "game" can be wildly successful with other women (excepting his wife). Not to mention the requirements a woman has for her housemate husband are never a barrier for the rando dude who merely remarks that she's hot (drops panties).

At least it is equally easy for all to find satisfaction: just pick any married partner (not your spouse) and go.

To avoid the issue of losing interest, DH and I liberally use roleplay fantasies. We've done just about every fantasy (non-BDSM or things like that, but nearly always with a light sub/dom dynamic) and it really helps keep things interesting!

I’ve been in a “relationship” for the past 3 years but am not in love nor am I attracted to him. I see him as more of a best friend but am scared of being lonely. I’m still not over my ex that I dated before getting into current relationship and am still holding onto hope that one day we’ll get back together.

My ex was AMAZING in bed and it makes me sad sometimes that I’ll never feel that way again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It’s a big cycle that starts with a wife losing interest in her husband. She becomes lonely and easily falls into bed with the first rando (not her DH) showing her some male attention.

But it’s NOT because her DH is a fat bald loser! Because this game works the same for her DH: he flirts with a married women (not his DW) and she falls right into bed with him.

It’s just that women are wired to lose interest in her husband, so she gets lonely while he goes elsewhere and you extrapolate this across an entire population... everybody is still having plenty of sex, just not with spouse!!

I think this is exactly true. I was FINE with fat DH until he stopped paying attention to me and our family (yeah, whatever, I don't want to hear it) and I fell (jumped, actually) into bed with the first rando loser who found me attractive.

But which came first? You lost all interest (in him) or he stopped paying attention? It has been well established that a man's "game" becomes ineffective over time for the same women. Meanwhile his exact same "game" can be wildly successful with other women (excepting his wife). Not to mention the requirements a woman has for her housemate husband are never a barrier for the rando dude who merely remarks that she's hot (drops panties).

At least it is equally easy for all to find satisfaction: just pick any married partner (not your spouse) and go.