Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t wait for the exciting town hall meeting. It’s going to be a fun time for all!
I think people won't be able to turn out as much as they'd like. It's the week before Christmas, and there's tons of stuff going on - holiday work parties, school events. I agree with the PP that I bet they're counting on that so this can get pushed through, even though it may not be in the best interest of the residents of Rockville.
Anonymous wrote:How does It’s Sugar stay in business?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there also a large development project planned for the Stonestreet area? I remember hearing about it, but would have to look up details. Will that be additional housing units feeding into JW and RM?
https://www.rockvillemd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28548/Stonestreet-Corridor-Study---Final---May-11-2018
They plan to rezone some of the area from Single Family Residential (R-60) to Mixed Use Neighborhood Commercial (MXNC) and Residential Medium Density (RMD-15), which will allow duplexes, quads, townhouses and stacked flats.
There is nothing planned. The rezoning is in hope of getting some development there. It's not going to happen in the SFH areas without City using eminent domain, which is not going to happen. Plus, this area is zoned for Rockville, not RM.
If the zoning allows duplexes, triplexes, quads, townhouses, and stacked flats, then they will get built if builders think the demand is there. No need for eminent domain.
I think this is a good thing. The City of Minneapolis just voted to eliminate single-family-detached as a zoning category. Residential structures with up to 3 units will now be allowed in every neighborhood.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/us/minneapolis-single-family-zoning.html
Anonymous wrote:I can’t wait for the exciting town hall meeting. It’s going to be a fun time for all!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does It’s Sugar stay in business?
All the kids that skate or use the fountains...popular with them.
Anonymous wrote:How does It’s Sugar stay in business?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are delusional. The stores in TC are expensive. Why the heck would someone buy expensive groceries at Dawsons market when there is a cheaper Giants close by? Why would they buy a shirt for $50 at a boutique in TC when you can go to a bigger brand store to but a shirt for $20? Yes, giving those failing businesses my tax money to stay afloat is a waste of money.
Do you think most people who live around TC can afford pricey things? I live near TC and bought one thing at Dawson's out of convenience but it was so damned expensive I will never shop there again. Other than that one item, I have never bought a clothing item in one of their boutiques because it's too expensive. Those stores hardly ever have customers in them, not because there aren't enough residents near TC but because most people who live near TC can't afford or don't want to pay ridiculous prices for consumer goods.
Put in a store that will attract people, like an Apple store or even Sephora, or any store that has mass appeal, not the little boutiques that hardly anyone around here would shop at. Save that for Bethesda. TC is not a rich person's hang out place.
Why would anyone shop at Whole Foods in Kentlands when there is a cheaper Giant close by?
If you think that the City of Rockville should not subsidize Dawson's, fine. It's nonetheless a fact that more people living around Rockville Town Center means more potential customers within walking distance for retail around Rockville Town Center, whatever that retail happens to be. And the people in retail location are aware such things -- see, for example, the Target in Bethesda.
Anonymous wrote:
You are delusional. The stores in TC are expensive. Why the heck would someone buy expensive groceries at Dawsons market when there is a cheaper Giants close by? Why would they buy a shirt for $50 at a boutique in TC when you can go to a bigger brand store to but a shirt for $20? Yes, giving those failing businesses my tax money to stay afloat is a waste of money.
Do you think most people who live around TC can afford pricey things? I live near TC and bought one thing at Dawson's out of convenience but it was so damned expensive I will never shop there again. Other than that one item, I have never bought a clothing item in one of their boutiques because it's too expensive. Those stores hardly ever have customers in them, not because there aren't enough residents near TC but because most people who live near TC can't afford or don't want to pay ridiculous prices for consumer goods.
Put in a store that will attract people, like an Apple store or even Sephora, or any store that has mass appeal, not the little boutiques that hardly anyone around here would shop at. Save that for Bethesda. TC is not a rich person's hang out place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
You are delusional. The stores in TC are expensive. Why the heck would someone buy expensive groceries at Dawsons market when there is a cheaper Giants close by? Why would they buy a shirt for $50 at a boutique in TC when you can go to a bigger brand store to but a shirt for $20? Yes, giving those failing businesses my tax money to stay afloat is a waste of money.
Do you think most people who live around TC can afford pricey things? I live near TC and bought one thing at Dawson's out of convenience but it was so damned expensive I will never shop there again. Other than that one item, I have never bought a clothing item in one of their boutiques because it's too expensive. Those stores hardly ever have customers in them, not because there aren't enough residents near TC but because most people who live near TC can't afford or don't want to pay ridiculous prices for consumer goods.
Put in a store that will attract people, like an Apple store or even Sephora, or any store that has mass appeal, not the little boutiques that hardly anyone around here would shop at. Save that for Bethesda. TC is not a rich person's hang out place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
The pp you’re replying to us referring to the fund set up to support failing businesses (reallly Dawson’s Market). This wouldn’t be needed if we had more housing built. The pp would rather have the town center fail than either bail out businesses or allow building because their precious angel might have an extra 2 kids in homeroom.
That's not how it works. Class size and school capacity are separate variables. Over-capacity, at-capacity, and under-capacity schools all have the same class sizes. The difference is that at over-capacity schools, there are lots of portables, and at under-capacity schools, there are empty classrooms.
It sounds like it’s time for county wide redistricting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point it seems like you people would rather see the town center fail than add even one new kid to the schools.
I don't want my tax money going to help shore up a business that can't stay a float without.
Allowing builders to build more housing in Rockville Town Center, which will put more potential customers within walking distance of the retail in Rockville Town Center (and the surrounding area), is not using your tax money to help shore up a business that can't stay afloat without it.
The pp you’re replying to us referring to the fund set up to support failing businesses (reallly Dawson’s Market). This wouldn’t be needed if we had more housing built. The pp would rather have the town center fail than either bail out businesses or allow building because their precious angel might have an extra 2 kids in homeroom.
That's not how it works. Class size and school capacity are separate variables. Over-capacity, at-capacity, and under-capacity schools all have the same class sizes. The difference is that at over-capacity schools, there are lots of portables, and at under-capacity schools, there are empty classrooms.
It sounds like it’s time for county wide redistricting.