Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gotta a love a post that supports free speech by urging the expulsion of students who exercise it!
This is not about free speech. It is about respect. If you cannot be in an academic environment without swearing and threatening the staff, then you do not belong there.
I think you mistake liberty for license.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Breaking News: Looks like the students got most of what they demanded - http://www.boston.com/news/education/2015/11/17/yale-president-responds-student-demands/zOJkcdZKtIFEyZCym0xZxM/story.html
Not really, and some of these things would have happened without Shreiking Yale Girl screaming "fuck" at the Silliman master, whom Yale did not agree to replace. So the spoiled little brats can mull that over for a while.
right. They got some of what they wanted, and the uni will probably give the a slow roll on the rest![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Breaking News: Looks like the students got most of what they demanded - http://www.boston.com/news/education/2015/11/17/yale-president-responds-student-demands/zOJkcdZKtIFEyZCym0xZxM/story.html
Not really, and some of these things would have happened without Shreiking Yale Girl screaming "fuck" at the Silliman master, whom Yale did not agree to replace. So the spoiled little brats can mull that over for a while.
Anonymous wrote:Breaking News: Looks like the students got most of what they demanded - http://www.boston.com/news/education/2015/11/17/yale-president-responds-student-demands/zOJkcdZKtIFEyZCym0xZxM/story.html
I believe the new academic center had been in the works before the recent events. That said, I think the name change (John C. Calhoun) is most definitely a step in the right direction. There isn't one building on any university campus that receives any type of funding (and that includes student loans) that should be named after anyone associated with enslavement or war crimes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Breaking News: Looks like the students got most of what they demanded - http://www.boston.com/news/education/2015/11/17/yale-president-responds-student-demands/zOJkcdZKtIFEyZCym0xZxM/story.html
The President provided a thoughtful response which granted the protestors reasonable requests that could be accommodated in a short time period, ignored or explicitly denied a few (such as firing the Master and his wife over the Halloween email or building the monument about Yale being on land stolen from indigenous peoples), in significant ways offered alternative approaches to what the students requested that may be more effective or at least possible in the near term, and kept open a dialogue and process for a continuing evaluation of some other issues that can only be addressed by the board (Yale Corporation to which the President answers), the Faculty, or that the President wants input on from a variety of campus communities before deciding on a course of action. Some of the more immediate changes will go into effect in the Spring Semester and others not until the Fall Semester. Interestingly, Yale used this as an occasion to announce a new academic center devoted to the study of race and other social issues impacting underrepresented minorities. At least the initial response judging from on line posts are positive from a large majority of students, although the protest leaders will no doubt keep a close eye on things.
,
This is more than just about a Halloween costume! The email was the catalyst. I don't understand why that is so difficult to understand the underlying cause.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Racist actions are no joke...whether it makes you uncomfortable or not. The recipients of those ugly actions have a right to speak out loudly and firmly but not at the expense of harrassment to others which is why the students are speaking out.Anonymous wrote:^^ oh, and I forgot the theoretical wearing of certain Halloween costumes.
The message gets lost when the very treatment they received is inflicted by them on those they're trying to reach. Noticeably, the very rightful issue they march for gets wrongly lost.
an e-mail expressing the opinion that the university should not tell it’s students what kind of Halloween costumes to wear is not a “racist action.” See that’s where I disagree with these radical professional offence takers.
Anonymous wrote:Breaking News: Looks like the students got most of what they demanded - http://www.boston.com/news/education/2015/11/17/yale-president-responds-student-demands/zOJkcdZKtIFEyZCym0xZxM/story.html
Anonymous wrote:Racist actions are no joke...whether it makes you uncomfortable or not. The recipients of those ugly actions have a right to speak out loudly and firmly but not at the expense of harrassment to others which is why the students are speaking out.Anonymous wrote:^^ oh, and I forgot the theoretical wearing of certain Halloween costumes.
The message gets lost when the very treatment they received is inflicted by them on those they're trying to reach. Noticeably, the very rightful issue they march for gets wrongly lost.
Racist actions are no joke...whether it makes you uncomfortable or not. The recipients of those ugly actions have a right to speak out loudly and firmly but not at the expense of harrassment to others which is why the students are speaking out.Anonymous wrote:^^ oh, and I forgot the theoretical wearing of certain Halloween costumes.
Anonymous wrote:I have to agree. As much as someone may dislike the message (different strokes for different folks), the First Amendment protects that right. Anybody ever wonder why the Westboro 'church' has been able to proceed with their despicable antics? Freedom of speech but no physical confrontation regardless how heinous the message.Anonymous wrote:Yelling fuck and calling the police pigs was very fashionable in my day. I really believe people are over reacting to a few individuals behavior.
Students who demonstrate because they demand boston creme pie? Silly? Yes. Allowed to assemble? Yes. Allowed to voice their opinions loudly? Yes. Allowed to smash those pies in students faces as they make their demands? Hell, no!! That's when the line is crossed and punitive action is rightfully warranted.
I have to agree. As much as someone may dislike the message (different strokes for different folks), the First Amendment protects that right. Anybody ever wonder why the Westboro 'church' has been able to proceed with their despicable antics? Freedom of speech but no physical confrontation regardless how heinous the message.Anonymous wrote:Yelling fuck and calling the police pigs was very fashionable in my day. I really believe people are over reacting to a few individuals behavior.