The dress was modeled from Grace Kelly's wedding dress.

Ooh. Ooh. I wasn't on DCUM when the wedding happened. I must report my opinion.

I think Kate's dress was really dull. It looked like something that could have been bought off the rack at any bridal shop. I also thought that Princess Diana's wedding dress was a monstrosity back when she was married (when I was in middle school.)

I think the Chelsea Clinton's (Vera Wang) wedding dress was one of the most beautiful and unique dresses I've seen.

Ok. I'm done.

Anonymous wrote:She's a Princess and young... it should have had more of a wow factor. A BIT of "sparkle". It was too matronly for a young princess. And her hair was blah. Maybe if they didn't hype it up about all the secrecy surrounding her wedding dress, it wouldn't have been so bad. The dress was lovely; just didn't have the "she looks like a princess!!!" factor. Sorry. I was highly disappointed.

It's 4 years later, people! She already has 2 kids. Enough with the wedding critiques.

She's a Princess and young... it should have had more of a wow factor. A BIT of "sparkle". It was too matronly for a young princess. And her hair was blah. Maybe if they didn't hype it up about all the secrecy surrounding her wedding dress, it wouldn't have been so bad. The dress was lovely; just didn't have the "she looks like a princess!!!" factor. Sorry. I was highly disappointed.

Can we talk about Downton Abbey now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mindless drivel by those who have nothing better to do with their time.

You mean like your comment?

Careful now or you might just miss the latest episode of "The Real Housewives of ......." or is it what the Kardashians are up to?

^^Merely expressing an opinion like you are!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mindless drivel by those who have nothing better to do with their time.

You mean like your comment?

Seriously, when a thread from two years ago was revived to discuss the outfit of an English woman whose only accomplishment of note was getting married to someone in the British royal family, does it not raise questions about the posters who opine her fricking wedding dress?

I'm assuming you're the poster defending your "mindless drivel" comment. My point is, you yourself posted some mindless drivel. And what's it to you if people want to talk about a dress from two years ago? Is there a finite amount of space on the internet? Are we in danger of running out of space? Do you have no where else in the internet you might go? I don't know who revived the thread, but what is it to you?

I'm impressed that it's made it to 25 pages!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mindless drivel by those who have nothing better to do with their time.

You mean like your comment?

Seriously, when a thread from two years ago was revived to discuss the outfit of an English woman whose only accomplishment of note was getting married to someone in the British royal family, does it not raise questions about the posters who opine her fricking wedding dress?

Who the fluck cares what she was wearing and whether it was dull especially given that the time that has elapsed?

Anonymous wrote:Mindless drivel by those who have nothing better to do with their time.

You mean like your comment?

Mindless drivel by those who have nothing better to do with their time.