Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NYTimes article is interesting bc it’s based on the two men survivors who signed up for the group tour individually. It’s not like they had friends die or know family members seeking answers or prevention. The two women survivors are mum, as are the two guide survivors.
That said, according to the two men, nothing was up for discussion— not the Monday trail circle or the Tuesday early return or its route. The guides met with themselves over breakfast, decided, then told both groups.
Those two men were outsiders and had no idea who was actually pulling the strings. My guess is there was at least 1-3 alpha women in the group calling the shots. That's why everyone else is quiet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
See the excerpt from above. The guided picked a path that was "known" to be safe because it hadn't had avalanches in the past and was only 20 degrees instead of 30 degrees or greater, which poses an avalanche risk.
https://avalanche.org/avalanche-encyclopedia/terrain/slope-characteristics/slope-angle/
Someone should probably measure the "safe" slope again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NYTimes article is interesting bc it’s based on the two men survivors who signed up for the group tour individually. It’s not like they had friends die or know family members seeking answers or prevention. The two women survivors are mum, as are the two guide survivors.
That said, according to the two men, nothing was up for discussion— not the Monday trail circle or the Tuesday early return or its route. The guides met with themselves over breakfast, decided, then told both groups.
Those two men were outsiders and had no idea who was actually pulling the strings. My guess is there was at least 1-3 alpha women in the group calling the shots. That's why everyone else is quiet.
Anonymous wrote:The NYTimes article is interesting bc it’s based on the two men survivors who signed up for the group tour individually. It’s not like they had friends die or know family members seeking answers or prevention. The two women survivors are mum, as are the two guide survivors.
That said, according to the two men, nothing was up for discussion— not the Monday trail circle or the Tuesday early return or its route. The guides met with themselves over breakfast, decided, then told both groups.
Anonymous wrote:The article was well-done. I’m confused why they didn’t take one of the flat routes south from the huts and then message the backcountry headquarters that they needed a ride over to where the cars were parked.
Anonymous wrote:The NYTimes article is interesting bc it’s based on the two men survivors who signed up for the group tour individually. It’s not like they had friends die or know family members seeking answers or prevention. The two women survivors are mum, as are the two guide survivors.
That said, according to the two men, nothing was up for discussion— not the Monday trail circle or the Tuesday early return or its route. The guides met with themselves over breakfast, decided, then told both groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
See the excerpt from above. The guided picked a path that was "known" to be safe because it hadn't had avalanches in the past and was only 20 degrees instead of 30 degrees or greater, which poses an avalanche risk.
https://avalanche.org/avalanche-encyclopedia/terrain/slope-characteristics/slope-angle/
Someone should probably measure the "safe" slope again.
It was below a steeper slope, which is where the avalanche started.
There are still unknowns why they decided to go out in the storm at all. Aside from avalanche risk, there are a lot of risks of being in a white out, especially with mixed abilities and experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
See the excerpt from above. The guided picked a path that was "known" to be safe because it hadn't had avalanches in the past and was only 20 degrees instead of 30 degrees or greater, which poses an avalanche risk.
https://avalanche.org/avalanche-encyclopedia/terrain/slope-characteristics/slope-angle/
Someone should probably measure the "safe" slope again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
See the excerpt from above. The guided picked a path that was "known" to be safe because it hadn't had avalanches in the past and was only 20 degrees instead of 30 degrees or greater, which poses an avalanche risk.
https://avalanche.org/avalanche-encyclopedia/terrain/slope-characteristics/slope-angle/
Someone should probably measure the "safe" slope again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Thank you to that PP for the gift link. It was a beautifully written article.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Blaming others when these folks are supposed to be highly intelligent, well-trained skiers with years of epertise and skiing opportunities. Didn't take the time to read weather reports? File lawsuits instead, of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Story in NYT relaying account from two of the survivors (gift link): https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/02/28/us/tahoe-avalanche-survivors.html?unlocked_article_code=1.PlA.m9Z3.x4oSjjKcyO5_&smid=url-share
Puts all the decision-making onus on the guides. More stories to come, I'm sure.
Thank you to that PP for the gift link. It was a beautifully written article.