Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
I can't possibly believe that would be the strategy without surveying membership.
I think most people would be happy with some TW right now vs no TW for the remainder of Trump's term. The FLRA is not really independent anymore so you are talking about a long long time before this is resolved.
Union has been very quiet and I’m sure that is on purpose. I think any survey would send people into a frenzy and possibly derail any possible negotiations. That said, they aren’t negotiating anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the previous poster.
The only punitive action I know of is the reassignment of an Enforcement senior counsel to chief counsel of OIT.
(Considering how awfully our hardware and software function, that attorney may have been able to do truly good work for the agency.)
There were more. Pretty much anyone working on crypto matters, be it enforcement or the SAB, etc. was “reassigned” until they left a few weeks/months later.
I’m not denying that this happened at all, but I personally know multiple enforcement attorneys who worked crypto matters and seem to be still here doing just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the previous poster.
The only punitive action I know of is the reassignment of an Enforcement senior counsel to chief counsel of OIT.
(Considering how awfully our hardware and software function, that attorney may have been able to do truly good work for the agency.)
There were more. Pretty much anyone working on crypto matters, be it enforcement or the SAB, etc. was “reassigned” until they left a few weeks/months later.
Correct. There was targeted retaliation. [/quote
And the SEC NTEU assisted management, not the employees.]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
I can't possibly believe that would be the strategy without surveying membership.
I think most people would be happy with some TW right now vs no TW for the remainder of Trump's term. The FLRA is not really independent anymore so you are talking about a long long time before this is resolved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
I can't possibly believe that would be the strategy without surveying membership.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the previous poster.
The only punitive action I know of is the reassignment of an Enforcement senior counsel to chief counsel of OIT.
(Considering how awfully our hardware and software function, that attorney may have been able to do truly good work for the agency.)
There were more. Pretty much anyone working on crypto matters, be it enforcement or the SAB, etc. was “reassigned” until they left a few weeks/months later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
Of course not. Their hands are tied.
Atkins hates telework and thinks we need to be in person to be productive. What no one has told him is he’s living in a different time. People are just as if not more productive at home. We need some in person to get to know people etc but all the time is killing productivity. I don’t know if whoever is advising him hasn’t bothered or he can’t seem to understand. But he has no frame of reference for what a mother with kids is going through. And I do believe he doesn’t know the pain he’s inflicted on staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
Of course not. Their hands are tied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
+1. My understanding is the union is open to settling because people need relief now. That said, I dont think the agency has offered anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Sorry, I should have said that information was a few weeks ago. If they are in fact negotiating or having any discussions about telework, I’d be thrilled. I am one of those who is riding the struggle bus towards unemployment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The best part about the arbitration is that administration is waiting until the last possible day to notify the union of its appeal. They need an extra 30 days on top of the 12-18 months they’re buying with an appeal.
I agree with everyone who said there will be a mass exodus. I think it will be a lot of women who leave first, probably leaving the workforce entirely because the job market sucks and the SEC sucks for women now. It used to attract high quality women becuase of the flexibility.
You are grasping at straws here. Legal filings are almost always made the day of the deadline (often very late in the day) and there is no reason why the agency would act before the deadline. And, unless you are GG, you probably have no idea whether there have been any discussions with the union.
According to my union steward, the union is not engaged in discussions with the agency. The union feels this is a strong win and wants to see the litigation through the long process to secure a win.
Your steward doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the previous poster.
The only punitive action I know of is the reassignment of an Enforcement senior counsel to chief counsel of OIT.
(Considering how awfully our hardware and software function, that attorney may have been able to do truly good work for the agency.)
There were more. Pretty much anyone working on crypto matters, be it enforcement or the SAB, etc. was “reassigned” until they left a few weeks/months later.