Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
That's one vote right, did the coach convince everyone else to vote the same way?
You must be a FSR parent, coach, etc since your blindspot is obvious. It's clear that you don't really want the answer and pretend that you do. Logic, rationale, integrity, etc. escapes you, as keep evading the question of the previous poster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
Wait... So BF had 6 on the all-state team (COY, 3 first teamers, 2 second teamers). Madison, YT, Oak, Lang, Cosby, FSR, each had a total of 3. DR, WP had 2. Robo, Justice, SL, Patriot, and Woodson had 1. Sounds your coach did an outstanding job of advocating for her team. But you want 7 on the All-state team, which is twice as many as very good teams (some that beat BF). That just sounds like sour grapes about 9 months after the fact.
Dummy you just proved their point, FSR is probably the worst out of that group and as many people on the all-state team as some of the top teams. It doesn't sound like sour grapes. It sounds like some other teams got snubbed. Does that make sense to you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
Wait... So BF had 6 on the all-state team (COY, 3 first teamers, 2 second teamers). Madison, YT, Oak, Lang, Cosby, FSR, each had a total of 3. DR, WP had 2. Robo, Justice, SL, Patriot, and Woodson had 1. Sounds your coach did an outstanding job of advocating for her team. But you want 7 on the All-state team, which is twice as many as very good teams (some that beat BF). That just sounds like sour grapes about 9 months after the fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
That's one vote right, did the coach convince everyone else to vote the same way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
would you still vote for your own player if another crushes your team and you clearly know that the other team has the best team and player?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Curious, how did the coach undermine the system. I don't understand the issue? Don't the coaches vote?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Promote. Yes. Undermine the system. No. How can someone in their right mind justify that move when they lost to the other team 21-3 (last year)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Isn't the job of the coach, to promote their players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
This is spot on. And one said player was coaches daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Not the OP, but FSR and Battlefield are in the same district and region. So I assume the OP meant the FSR coach was pushing for his own players over BHS players in those meetings. Not the OP though, so just a guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.
that sounds about right, but was curious about what the BF commenter meant when the FSR coach tried to push awards over the BF players
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BF 16-0 over Freedom SR
Weather delay caused running clock from the start. BF was running on all cylinders
Wow. Maybe freedom coach should think twice pushing his players for all state awards over BF girls…
Be nice 😊
Wait, didn't he get 3 of them on the state team on offense alone?
thats crazy since they were a ~.500 team, how'd he manage to do that?
To get on the state team you have to be 1st Team District and 1st Team Regional, right? So, if a team comes from an easier district and region, then they can get a disproportionate number of players as first team all-Region. Then they will have a disproportionate chance at all-state. I think that's how it works. Obviously correct me if I'm wrong.