Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.
Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.
8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.
I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.
I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.
How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.
Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.
Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.
8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.
I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.
I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.
Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b
In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.
Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?
Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.
You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.
What does this even refer to?
Anonymous wrote:We’re paying for this frivolous case over beach shells or rocks?
“Whatever makes sense” - Vance
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?
Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.
You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?
Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.
You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At what point does this become straight up harassment?
Six lawsuits over several years? Not even.
You democrats set the benchmark. Enjoy the fruits of it.