Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
Interesting. According to the OPM itself, around 100,000 have been retiring each year.
Is this offer actually causing people to hold off on retirement out of distrust?
https://www.opm.gov/retirement-center/retirement-statistics/
2023 108,387
2022 114,505
2021 96,956
2020 99,529
It's only the beginning of February. If those retirements are spaced evenly throughout the year, then 20k is a bit above the norm. Not much, but some.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
They are going to find out the hard way the takers probably aren't going to get paid anything.
If they were going to retire anyway, it's reasonable to take this deal, for however long it pays out.
Actually it’s probably not. You might waive rights to which you are otherwise entitled by taking a deal that congress didn’t appropriate funds for or otherwise approve.
I know several people who would be interested in VERA but have absolutely no interest in this. Nobody trusts it.
Anonymous wrote:Seems not to be going well. The sketchy buyout is turning into a threat. I guess Feds are tougher than Silicon Valley tech bros.
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has warned federal employees that they could be furloughed if they do not accept a buyout offer that expires Thursday, according to an email obtained by USA TODAY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
Interesting. According to the OPM itself, around 100,000 have been retiring each year.
Is this offer actually causing people to hold off on retirement out of distrust?
https://www.opm.gov/retirement-center/retirement-statistics/
2023 108,387
2022 114,505
2021 96,956
2020 99,529
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
They are going to find out the hard way the takers probably aren't going to get paid anything.
If they were going to retire anyway, it's reasonable to take this deal, for however long it pays out.
Actually it’s probably not. You might waive rights to which you are otherwise entitled by taking a deal that congress didn’t appropriate funds for or otherwise approve.
Anonymous wrote:
I've been saying for a while now that we need at least 20,000 to test the theory. If there were only 200, that could've been strung along for a bit. But at 20,000, they'll have to do what they were going to do.
It's going to be a real Betty Boop moment of "Oopsie! Aw shucks, guys, looks like we couldn't pass the budget with that entanglement, and now all administrative leave positions are summarily being ended. No biggie, no work was getting done anyway, so .... oopsie!"
It will land with the same squeeze of a wet fart that greeted RFKJ "unexpectedly" coming out to fireworks at that one Trump rally. What -- OMG this is incredible, nobody could have expected this, fzzzzzz-squit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
Interesting. According to the OPM itself, around 100,000 have been retiring each year.
Is this offer actually causing people to hold off on retirement out of distrust?
https://www.opm.gov/retirement-center/retirement-statistics/
2023 108,387
2022 114,505
2021 96,956
2020 99,529
It's only the beginning of February. If those retirements are spaced evenly throughout the year, then 20k is a bit above the norm. Not much, but some.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
They are going to find out the hard way the takers probably aren't going to get paid anything.
If they were going to retire anyway, it's reasonable to take this deal, for however long it pays out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
Interesting. According to the OPM itself, around 100,000 have been retiring each year.
Is this offer actually causing people to hold off on retirement out of distrust?
https://www.opm.gov/retirement-center/retirement-statistics/
2023 108,387
2022 114,505
2021 96,956
2020 99,529
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
They are going to find out the hard way the takers probably aren't going to get paid anything.
Anonymous wrote:Axioms reporting 20k takers do far
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reporting now says that only 20k have taken the offer and deep cuts are likely if more do not accept. Is a RIF better than this deferred resignation?
The problem is that you are calling this a "deferred resignation. " It is not.
Ask instead: "Is a RIF better than popping my own joints out of socket so I can stab myself in the back with this fork, and how long will it take for me to bleed out?"