Anonymous wrote:Where are these UMC or MC men who are willing to marry in their early twenties? Who are these young pretty women supposed to marry??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Joey King and Millie Bobbie Brown Don’t really have that many followers compared to Kim Kardashian, Taylor, Swift, and Selena Gomez.
She has 18 million, Millie Bobby Brown I think has maybe 40 million. Selena has well over 400 million and Taylor is approaching 300 million with Kim somewhere in between.
Taylor is a proud, childless cat lady, Selena is early 30s never married Recently revealed, she will never carry her on children anyway and Kim Kardashian has been divorced four times and two of her kids were born via surrogacy. So I would be careful saying celebs with a lot of followers are influencing the young generation. It works both ways.
Ambitious UMC zoomers are certainly not looking at single and unmarried Swift, unmarried and barren Selena, or Kardashian trash with any admiration. To teen and 20-somethings, those women are all old and if anything highlight what not to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are these UMC or MC men who are willing to marry in their early twenties? Who are these young pretty women supposed to marry??
This was asked a couple times and not answered, which was unsurprising because blaming women is a lot more fun. And it's a great question.
There was one example of a happy young bride with a husband 17 years her senior she met as a teen so I suppose that may answer the question at least partially.
One answer would be the very same adults in this thread encouraging young people to delay their lives are failing to raise their sons to be mature, quality prospects who value marriage and family formation. A small percentage are raised that way, and they are the ones who will marry early.
But the culture absolutely encourages protracted adolescence. And the girls who wait it out are the unfortunate ones who end up having to drag those bumps on a log into adulthood and family life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Traveling with mama is not what people mean when they say "travel and see the world." That you would unironically write that tells me so much about you.
DP.
What does “travel and see the world” mean if not travel and see the world, which one can do with their friends, their parents, or even by themselves!
Do you mean getting drunk, high, and having sex with random strangers? That’s the only scenario in which you’re right and one would not get that experience traveling with mama…
Traveling with your parents - where you are handheld, taken to mommy-selected destinations and landmarks, and are told what to do and what to eat and when to go to sleep - are completely different from travel that you yourself organize, budget for and navigate unassisted. The first is a theme park. The second is an adulting experience.
My kids’ social media is full of college and 20-something couples traveling together. It sounds like you’re a bit oblivious to the lifestyle of ambitious UMC and UC young adults. Travel photos are couples and large friend groups with lots of couples. Then once they’re engaged or married, they do everything with their young spouse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are these UMC or MC men who are willing to marry in their early twenties? Who are these young pretty women supposed to marry??
This was asked a couple times and not answered, which was unsurprising because blaming women is a lot more fun. And it's a great question.
There was one example of a happy young bride with a husband 17 years her senior she met as a teen so I suppose that may answer the question at least partially.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Joey King and Millie Bobbie Brown Don’t really have that many followers compared to Kim Kardashian, Taylor, Swift, and Selena Gomez.
She has 18 million, Millie Bobby Brown I think has maybe 40 million. Selena has well over 400 million and Taylor is approaching 300 million with Kim somewhere in between.
Taylor is a proud, childless cat lady, Selena is early 30s never married Recently revealed, she will never carry her on children anyway and Kim Kardashian has been divorced four times and two of her kids were born via surrogacy. So I would be careful saying celebs with a lot of followers are influencing the young generation. It works both ways.
Ambitious UMC zoomers are certainly not looking at single and unmarried Swift, unmarried and barren Selena, or Kardashian trash with any admiration. To teen and 20-somethings, those women are all old and if anything highlight what not to do.
Anonymous wrote:Give it 10 years and they'll all be divorced and looking for a 2nd spouse to have kids with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Traveling with mama is not what people mean when they say "travel and see the world." That you would unironically write that tells me so much about you.
DP.
What does “travel and see the world” mean if not travel and see the world, which one can do with their friends, their parents, or even by themselves!
Do you mean getting drunk, high, and having sex with random strangers? That’s the only scenario in which you’re right and one would not get that experience traveling with mama…
Traveling with your parents - where you are handheld, taken to mommy-selected destinations and landmarks, and are told what to do and what to eat and when to go to sleep - are completely different from travel that you yourself organize, budget for and navigate unassisted. The first is a theme park. The second is an adulting experience.

Anonymous wrote:Where are these UMC or MC men who are willing to marry in their early twenties? Who are these young pretty women supposed to marry??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Anonymous wrote:Joey King and Millie Bobbie Brown Don’t really have that many followers compared to Kim Kardashian, Taylor, Swift, and Selena Gomez.
She has 18 million, Millie Bobby Brown I think has maybe 40 million. Selena has well over 400 million and Taylor is approaching 300 million with Kim somewhere in between.
Taylor is a proud, childless cat lady, Selena is early 30s never married Recently revealed, she will never carry her on children anyway and Kim Kardashian has been divorced four times and two of her kids were born via surrogacy. So I would be careful saying celebs with a lot of followers are influencing the young generation. It works both ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Traveling with mama is not what people mean when they say "travel and see the world." That you would unironically write that tells me so much about you.
DP.
What does “travel and see the world” mean if not travel and see the world, which one can do with their friends, their parents, or even by themselves!
Do you mean getting drunk, high, and having sex with random strangers? That’s the only scenario in which you’re right and one would not get that experience traveling with mama…
No they mean exploring the world on your own without your parents paying for everything and holding your hand the entire time. Navigating a foreign transportation system or a language you don't speak on your own without well-traveled parents who can always step in to explain or guide.
I traveled a ton between birth and age 12 because my dad worked for a huge international company and we lived all over the world as he helped set up offices and factories for them. And then even after we settled in the US so I could have a "normal" high school experience we still traveled abroad a lot. So I was a "well-traveled" kid. But when I traveled in my 20s on my own I learned different things about myself. It was a totally different experience. Independence is a really powerful thing to explore and I do think I would have missed out on something if I'd married straight out of college even though obviously I wasn't lacking in opportunities to travel.
I never did the drinking and drugging and casual sex type of travel btw. I did meet lots of interesting people but I have always known to be cautious when traveling abroad.
You’re speaking from an upper middle class / wealthy bubble. The vast majority of American kids, teens, and young adults will NEVER “see the world”. For the average American family a trip to a single European country for a week is literally a once-in-lifetime event.
So you can continue to split hairs about whether seeing the world as a kid “counts” or not, but just understand that it’s irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Traveling with mama is not what people mean when they say "travel and see the world." That you would unironically write that tells me so much about you.
DP.
What does “travel and see the world” mean if not travel and see the world, which one can do with their friends, their parents, or even by themselves!
Do you mean getting drunk, high, and having sex with random strangers? That’s the only scenario in which you’re right and one would not get that experience traveling with mama…
No they mean exploring the world on your own without your parents paying for everything and holding your hand the entire time. Navigating a foreign transportation system or a language you don't speak on your own without well-traveled parents who can always step in to explain or guide.
I traveled a ton between birth and age 12 because my dad worked for a huge international company and we lived all over the world as he helped set up offices and factories for them. And then even after we settled in the US so I could have a "normal" high school experience we still traveled abroad a lot. So I was a "well-traveled" kid. But when I traveled in my 20s on my own I learned different things about myself. It was a totally different experience. Independence is a really powerful thing to explore and I do think I would have missed out on something if I'd married straight out of college even though obviously I wasn't lacking in opportunities to travel.
I never did the drinking and drugging and casual sex type of travel btw. I did meet lots of interesting people but I have always known to be cautious when traveling abroad.
You’re speaking from an upper middle class / wealthy bubble. The vast majority of American kids, teens, and young adults will NEVER “see the world”. For the average American family a trip to a single European country for a week is literally a once-in-lifetime event.
So you can continue to split hairs about whether seeing the world as a kid “counts” or not, but just understand that it’s irrelevant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the other trend of not marrying at all?
I have coworkers with babies who are not married.
This is the actual trend. But it doesn't fit in with the current narrative being pushed
UMC/rich kids seem to be getting married younger. These kids likely have the support of the rich parents.
Poor and MC young adults may not have the money for a wedding or to buy a house. Our kids will have college, grad school, wedding and at least down payment from the parents. I would rather my kids marry relatively young in their twenties and have kids young.
I come from humble beginnings and traveled a ton in my twenties after I started working. My kids have been traveling internationally since they were young. My kids are still minors and been to Europe and Asia several times and the US/Caribbean countless times. It isn’t like they need to spend their twenties traveling and enjoying life. They have been doing this since being born.
Traveling with mama is not what people mean when they say "travel and see the world." That you would unironically write that tells me so much about you.
DP.
What does “travel and see the world” mean if not travel and see the world, which one can do with their friends, their parents, or even by themselves!
Do you mean getting drunk, high, and having sex with random strangers? That’s the only scenario in which you’re right and one would not get that experience traveling with mama…
No they mean exploring the world on your own without your parents paying for everything and holding your hand the entire time. Navigating a foreign transportation system or a language you don't speak on your own without well-traveled parents who can always step in to explain or guide.
I traveled a ton between birth and age 12 because my dad worked for a huge international company and we lived all over the world as he helped set up offices and factories for them. And then even after we settled in the US so I could have a "normal" high school experience we still traveled abroad a lot. So I was a "well-traveled" kid. But when I traveled in my 20s on my own I learned different things about myself. It was a totally different experience. Independence is a really powerful thing to explore and I do think I would have missed out on something if I'd married straight out of college even though obviously I wasn't lacking in opportunities to travel.
I never did the drinking and drugging and casual sex type of travel btw. I did meet lots of interesting people but I have always known to be cautious when traveling abroad.
You’re speaking from an upper middle class / wealthy bubble. The vast majority of American kids, teens, and young adults will NEVER “see the world”. For the average American family a trip to a single European country for a week is literally a once-in-lifetime event.
So you can continue to split hairs about whether seeing the world as a kid “counts” or not, but just understand that it’s irrelevant.