Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9
Langley > Madison by 3
Yorktown in braveheart
BI over Indy 7 to 5.
PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9 - Close (+)
Langley > Madison by 3 - Swing and miss (---)
Yorktown in braveheart Miss (--)
BI over Indy 7 to 5. swing and miss (---)
Overall grade (---)
The greater than (>

in Langley > Madison is a prediction for Langley.
Which means we each predicted 2 winners, and me scores were closer. And me last prediction was a joke.
If my competitor gets a +, seems like I should get a ++. Tho 2 wins shouldn't likely give anyone a +.
I will reevaluate-
PVI vs Robo - PVI by 9 Close (++) 1 goal off
Langley > Madison by 3 (++) 2 goal off
Yorktown in braveheart Miss (--) 3 goal off and wrong winner
BI over Indy 7 to 5. swing and miss (---) 8-10 goals off and wrong winner
Will give you a (-).
I can see how the Langley score was written funny and I even had a question, but just used your words as you used in the PVI post- "PVI by 9" and "Madison by 3". Excuse my mistake but you used 3 different formats to predict.
Will not give credit for the BI/Indy game. You wrote what you wrote and I am not a mind reader to know when you are making a joke. Be clearer or indicate you are joking and make a real prediction.
In the end your opponent beat you slightly, by dumb luck, in calling one game on the nose.
My grading scale-
One +/- for calling the right winner
One +/- for calling within two goals
One +/- for calling exact score or being more then 5 off
Add up the +/- and that is the score