Anonymous
04/15/2024 09:56
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:OJ was guilty.
Fuhrman was a racist cop in a longtime racist cop shop.
Finis.
He wasn’t guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
A contentious divorce and domestic violence spats is not enough to convict someone. Also, why would someone as rich as Nicole allow a waiter to borrow her car? Ron drove her car around despite only knowing her for six weeks. No woman is allowing a waiter to drive her car for six weeks and someone like Nicole wouldn’t sleep with a mere waiter. What was his real job?
Anonymous
04/15/2024 09:51
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Once again. Oj was in Chicago. They didn’t have his blood to plant at that point so as racist as furman was, it would of been virtually impossible to frame Oj here.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Oj killed them 100 percent- butchered them
Fuhrman “jumped the gate” and entered the Simpson household that same morning after he was at Nicole’s house at 5am or 3am according to reports. He woke up and told the kids the bad news which means he didn’t just access the crime scene at the courtyard but was inside the home rummaging around . oJ was arrested June 17-19 a few days after the death. Blood was drawn while he was in jail . Another detective had the vial of blood in his pocket and brought it to the Simpson house to Furhman -a huge no no. In addition, the bloody sock was just one drop of OJ’s blood with EDTA that appears on both sides of the sock (left and right). How does one drop of blood penetrate to both left and right sides of the sock without a laceration/cut to foot or sock? I know how. A test tube.
The jury made the right decision. Domestic violence was all the prosecution had because all the blood evidence came from Furhman and that’s not enough to convict someone to life in jail beyond a reasonable doubt. OJ’s kids would have lost both their mom and dad had that happened. Maybe it’s for a reason he was able to raise them and they were able to be with him when he croaked.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 09:20
Subject: OJ simpson Died
OJ was guilty.
Fuhrman was a racist cop in a longtime racist cop shop.
Finis.
Fuhrman was a racist cop in a longtime racist cop shop.
Finis.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 07:48
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 07:41
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You were definitely the kind of juror Cochran was hoping would be on the case. You’re just completely off on this one.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
Just watch Oj interviews. He’s a lying sack of …….
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Easy, took some of his blood in a vial and planted it.
This makes zero sense. If he’s this clever, why would he leave his blood or a trail at all? OJ ,who loved the cops , had enough foreknowledge that the cop on his case would be racist so he jumped ahead and framed his own blood from a test tube with a clearing agent on it and sprinkled it on his bloody socks that he forgets to dispose of in Chicago?. Furhman had access to labs not OJ
Why not simply dispose of the evidence? OJ can’t be that smart or that dumb to leave that entire trail behind. Furhman rigged the entire case.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 07:37
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Once again. Oj was in Chicago. They didn’t have his blood to plant at that point so as racist as furman was, it would of been virtually impossible to frame Oj here.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Oj killed them 100 percent- butchered them
Anonymous
04/15/2024 07:33
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Exactly. He didn’t care about the kids. Stalkers are self centered and have one goal in mind, to see what their target is up to at all times.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?
The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.
Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too
It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .
Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)
Jesus Christ, Chicago was in the immediate aftermath of the murders before a crime scene and investigation had been set up.
Once OJ was arrested for murders and in jail, he did get blood drawn stupidly to “clear his name” and get out of jail because the cops told him to do so help the investigation. Some of the 8mm blood in the vial collected by prison nurse Thano Peratis “went missing”. About 1-2 mm disappeared. Thano, under pressure, changed his testimony to say maybe he only withdrew 6-7 instead of 8mm to account for the missing blood. The defense said Furhman with his history likely took this missing blood and planted it on the gloves, car, and socks that OJ , (because he was prudent enough to wear gloves but leave it behind), left sloppily on the scene. Ron’s blood being found in the Bronco and anything else that was used as evidence was not enough to convict Oj beyond reasonable doubt because Fuhrman plead the fifth when asked if he tampered with the scene per his history . This is why the case tanked . There is no real proof we can be certain about because the detective who was a racist had carte Blanche to handle the crime scene and all its DNA evidence .
Here’s an article about Thano Peratis changing his testimony to account for the missing blood.
https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1996/12/10/OJ-nurse-changes-testimony/5632850194000/
Jesus Christ, the crime scene (where OJs blood was also found to the left of Bruno Magli footprints and what do you know a finger on OJs left hand was sliced open) was secured and processed before OJ returned from Chicago and started giving blood. OJs house (to include his Bronco) was also secured and searched before OJ returned home and started giving blood. The FBI also contradicted the defense hired gun expert regarding the EDTA issue.
He had a cut on his finger but the glove didn’t have tears on the fingers.
Yes genius, because the glove obviously came off for it to be left at the crime scene. Are people really this stupid?!
So you believe OJ was aware enough to wear a glove, but was dumb enough to leave the blood soaked glove where the dog could retrieve it and take it elsewhere ? He did this while his kids were asleep upstairs.
The glove wasn’t planted by the cops because Furhman loved OJ so much and suddenly changed and decided not to plant evidence as he usually did with AA males?
OJ went there to kill one person, Nicole. A person he knew he would have no trouble handling given the number of times he had beaten her previously. His plans went awry with Ron Goldman. Now he’s killed 2 people, 1 who put up a strong fight, he’s been cut and he needs to get the eff out of there because the scene was not as controlled as he thought it would be and he knows he’s got to make his flight to Chicago because that was going to be part of his alibi. So no I don’t think at that point he’s thinking clearly, he’s just like I have to get out of here.
OJ didn’t give a flying f@&$ about his kids when it came to his fights with Nicole. There’s a 911 call from her with him raging in the background as she pleads with him to stop so he doesn’t wake the kids.
Let’s also be real, the dirty cops framing people were doing it to people that were “easy” to frame, not world famous beloved sports icons. It’s incomprehensible to me that Mark Fuhrman was like you know what I’m going to step it up and try and frame OJ Simpson. That’s ludicrous.
Oj did the same thing as Trump does by throwing a million things out there to confuse the public and it worked for the person that thinks he’s innocent. The uneducated think Trump is great. The uneducated also think Oj was innocent. They may have the same fan base now
Anonymous
04/15/2024 00:59
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Easy, took some of his blood in a vial and planted it.
Look, I don't believe that he is innocent, but your argument is. EDTA was only in medical vials, which OJ would not have had access to. They didn't have Amazon the way we have now, and I think someone from a medical supply store just might have recognized OJ Simpson coming in and buying medical lab vials.
What makes a lot more sense is that while he did it, there was no conclusive evidence that he had and the racist police detective who hated black men, especially black men who dated or married white women, wanted to make sure that this black guy paid for what he did. So the black detective took blood from the police lab, and added it to the copious amounts of blood in several key places to add the suspect's DNA to the blood around the crime scene. He wanted to make sure that the black accused got his just due.
I think he was guilty, but Furman knew that he didn't have the evidence needed to get a conviction that he so desparately wanted, so he planted evidence to get the result he wanted, but it backfired and he lost the case he really wanted.
You may be right . He could be guilty but the reasons given don’t hold up. Escaping is cultural. OJ also hired an attorney for one another person in his family. His oldest son, Jason. There’s a reason he did that. He knew it was either him or Jason that would be the prime suspects.
I still am firmly convinced he wouldn’t do it on that day . Another important factor not noted at all is that OJ went to a dance recital with the family earlier that day for his daughter Sydney where he was told by Nicole that his daughter would be hosting a sleepover that night which means he expected the home to be full. Why would he choose that day of all days to kill Nicole? A day where he expected the house to be full of little girls.
Why would he wear gloves and leave them? Why would he keep a stick off Nicole’s fence on his front lawn as Furhman noted? If we assume OJ was of rational mind and thinking, why would he hightail it to Chicago, dispose of the knife , be cleaned up enough to board a limo, but leave blood soaked glove and socks behind ?
Also, why were O.J. and Nicole’s kids not allowed to testify ? They were the only ones at the house during the murders and when the cops came.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 00:51
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Easy, took some of his blood in a vial and planted it.
Look, I don't believe that he is innocent, but your argument is. EDTA was only in medical vials, which OJ would not have had access to. They didn't have Amazon the way we have now, and I think someone from a medical supply store just might have recognized OJ Simpson coming in and buying medical lab vials.
What makes a lot more sense is that while he did it, there was no conclusive evidence that he had and the racist police detective who hated black men, especially black men who dated or married white women, wanted to make sure that this black guy paid for what he did. So the black detective took blood from the police lab, and added it to the copious amounts of blood in several key places to add the suspect's DNA to the blood around the crime scene. He wanted to make sure that the black accused got his just due.
I think he was guilty, but Furman knew that he didn't have the evidence needed to get a conviction that he so desparately wanted, so he planted evidence to get the result he wanted, but it backfired and he lost the case he really wanted.
Anonymous
04/15/2024 00:39
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Furhman also spoke to OJ’s kids at the house. They were woken up by police officers in the middle of the night , whisked away to the rear garage to avoid seeing the scene out front, and told the news.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 23:01
Subject: OJ simpson Died
The reason he had reached out to Singular in Denver was because Singular had authored a book about the murder of a Denver radio talk show host by the name of Alan Berg back in 1986 entitled Talked To Death, one that Oliver Stone would later license from Singular to make a movie recounting the execution of Berg called Talk Radio. The killing of Berg was carried out by members of a neo-Nazi, white supremacist splinter group called The Order, who’d later be convicted of conspiracy, that wanted to start a violent national revolution by executing certain individuals. They had come down to Denver from Northeast Washington near the Northwest Idaho border a region of the United States that has become the headquarters for the racist Aryan nationalists. According to the LAPD insider, it also had become a popular retirement location for veteran police officers upon leaving the Los Angeles Police Department. Mark Fuhrman was known to move to this region as well, near Coeur d’alene, Idaho, when he retired in disgrace from the LAPD. The anonymous insider went on to say that there were neo-Nazi sympathizers within the LAPD, officers who were in command positions that protected these corrupt police officers who had a record of habitually corrupt practices while serving on the police force. This is why he saw no benefit in presenting such allegations to any of the justice apparatuses within L.A. County, and apparently California. The insider told Singular that he should attempt to get this information to the Simpson’s defense lawyers. Singular’s curiosity as an author in this genre of crime was intrigued enough to finally take up the challenge, and he would subsequently meet with members of O.J. Simpson’s defense team later in August of 1994. The “Dream Team” members would ultimately check out these bizarre allegations of Singular from his anonymous source and they would astonishingly find the evidence of these items to be true when they sought them out at the Los Angeles police property department. The defense team would in a sense now enlist Singular to attempt to get inside the LAPD forensic laboratory itself and secure other information they considered valuable but hidden. When Singular was not successful at doing so, or was not willing to do other things the defense requested, they appeared to act hostile and quick to kick him to the curb. In the meantime, Singular’s publisher would ultimately leak the information given to him in confidence to the L.A. D.A.’s office that Singular had a manuscript that contained information for which no one knew and had now given to the defense. The publisher, Viner, did it allegedly on advice of counsel to protect himself from any future charges. The prosecution would then attempt to sweat Singular to reveal his anonymous contact while threatening him with jail, if he refused. Singular still never gave in to their threats. The book is fascinating, to say the least, LEGACY OF DECEPTION and it’s an excellent read for those like us who still cannot get their fill of the O.J. Simpson murder case. One last thing before I let you go, something that I find quite interesting is that Mark Fuhrman would ultimately author his own book of the Simpson case entitled MARK FUHRMAN Murder In Brentwood.
His book would be published in 1997, two years after Singular’s book in 1995. What I find amazing is that Fuhrman’s book basically centers around he, himself, and all of the discoveries of evidence he made at Simpson’s Rockingham residence; the most important being the glove.
However, one item stands out as well as the glove that Fuhrman purports to have discovered. This item he discovers on the manicured boulevard in the upscale mansion neighborhood on Rockingham where O.J. Simpson lived. It is one of the highlighted discoveries made by Fuhrman that he talks about in his book, a piece of white stick that he claims looked out of place on the boulevard adjacent to Simpson’s Bronco. What is strange to us about that discovery is our attempt to imagine what significance Fuhrman thought it had in order for him to collect it as a potential piece of evidence in this murder case. Is Fuhrman attempting to imply that the perpetrator of these murders carried this piece of broken white stick from the murder site to Simpson’s property and dropped it? The onus was focused on Simpson already as a possible suspect when the detectives went to his Rockingham residence. Thus, Fuhrman apparently wants us to believe that Simpson brought the broken piece of stick to his residence after murdering two people. If so, why would Simpson do that? We cannot help but wonder if the truth inadvertently lies in the buried treasure of the last 20 years, LEGACY OF DECEPTION, whose anonymous source within the LAPD told Singular less than a month and a half after the murders took place in 1994 that Fuhrman himself broke that piece of stick off the back of Nicole Brown Simpson’s fence and used it to pick up the glove. Since Mr. Fuhrman elaborated about this stick in his book, as well as in his testimony on the witness stand, he needs to explain his thoughts about a murderer carrying such a stick back to his own residence. The idea of Simpson carrying it back to his home, and discarding it on a manicured boulevard, as those in his neighborhood after murdering two people is simply outrageously absurd.
His book would be published in 1997, two years after Singular’s book in 1995. What I find amazing is that Fuhrman’s book basically centers around he, himself, and all of the discoveries of evidence he made at Simpson’s Rockingham residence; the most important being the glove.
However, one item stands out as well as the glove that Fuhrman purports to have discovered. This item he discovers on the manicured boulevard in the upscale mansion neighborhood on Rockingham where O.J. Simpson lived. It is one of the highlighted discoveries made by Fuhrman that he talks about in his book, a piece of white stick that he claims looked out of place on the boulevard adjacent to Simpson’s Bronco. What is strange to us about that discovery is our attempt to imagine what significance Fuhrman thought it had in order for him to collect it as a potential piece of evidence in this murder case. Is Fuhrman attempting to imply that the perpetrator of these murders carried this piece of broken white stick from the murder site to Simpson’s property and dropped it? The onus was focused on Simpson already as a possible suspect when the detectives went to his Rockingham residence. Thus, Fuhrman apparently wants us to believe that Simpson brought the broken piece of stick to his residence after murdering two people. If so, why would Simpson do that? We cannot help but wonder if the truth inadvertently lies in the buried treasure of the last 20 years, LEGACY OF DECEPTION, whose anonymous source within the LAPD told Singular less than a month and a half after the murders took place in 1994 that Fuhrman himself broke that piece of stick off the back of Nicole Brown Simpson’s fence and used it to pick up the glove. Since Mr. Fuhrman elaborated about this stick in his book, as well as in his testimony on the witness stand, he needs to explain his thoughts about a murderer carrying such a stick back to his own residence. The idea of Simpson carrying it back to his home, and discarding it on a manicured boulevard, as those in his neighborhood after murdering two people is simply outrageously absurd.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 22:52
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Easy, took some of his blood in a vial and planted it.
This makes zero sense. If he’s this clever, why would he leave his blood or a trail at all? OJ ,who loved the cops , had enough foreknowledge that the cop on his case would be racist so he jumped ahead and framed his own blood from a test tube with a clearing agent on it and sprinkled it on his bloody socks that he forgets to dispose of in Chicago?. Furhman had access to labs not OJ
Why not simply dispose of the evidence? OJ can’t be that smart or that dumb to leave that entire trail behind. Furhman rigged the entire case.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 22:48
Subject: OJ simpson Died
What this anonymous person would tell Singular in early August 1994 would potentially knock this case to its knees, and Singular wondered why he had been chosen to deliver the message. According to the anonymous insider, the infamous detective who found the glove at OJ Simpson’s Rockingham residence, Mark Fuhrman, had not simply gone to Simpson’s residence with the senior detectives, Tom Lange and Phil Vannatter, from the LAPD S.I.D. unit later that morning around 5:15 AM.
The insider claimed that Fuhrman and someone else had gone to Simpson’s house earlier that dark night around 3:00 AM with the expectation that Fuhrman would find incriminating evidence. To his dismay he did not find anything incriminating and apparently got into an argument with whomever he had gone there with for leaving a crime scene. The maid who worked next door to Simpson, Rosa Lopez, would claim later at the time of the trial that she had heard men arguing in the middle of the night on the boundary line between her location and Simpson’s. The insider told Singular in August of 1994 that Fuhrman went back the second time with Vannatter and Lange and that he carried one of the bloody gloves in a blue plastic bag used by detectives to collect evidence. The insider alleged that Fuhrman picked the glove up with a stick made of a piece of wood broken off the back fence of Nicole Brown Simpson’s Bundy residence. Naturally, Singular was astonished by such claims and asked how could such allegations be proven. The insider told him that the police took photos of the glove and near the glove in the photo you will find a piece of the blue plastic evidence bag. Under a somewhat feeble cross examination 7 months later in February 1995, Det. Tom Lange would ultimately admit to seeing a piece of blue plastic near the glove. I use the word feeble as best to reflect on the subsequent anger Singular would have with Simpson’s own “Dream Team” that he took chances to help reveal this corruption. The stick used to carry the bloody glove was left on Simpson’s Rockingham property too, according to the LAPD insider, and would also be collected by the police as evidence found at the Simpson property. Singular asked the insider why they did not take this information directly to the police in Los Angeles, and was told that the level of corruption within the LAPD and the Los Angeles County justice apparatus in general was so insidious that officials within these departments could not be trusted.
The insider claimed that Fuhrman and someone else had gone to Simpson’s house earlier that dark night around 3:00 AM with the expectation that Fuhrman would find incriminating evidence. To his dismay he did not find anything incriminating and apparently got into an argument with whomever he had gone there with for leaving a crime scene. The maid who worked next door to Simpson, Rosa Lopez, would claim later at the time of the trial that she had heard men arguing in the middle of the night on the boundary line between her location and Simpson’s. The insider told Singular in August of 1994 that Fuhrman went back the second time with Vannatter and Lange and that he carried one of the bloody gloves in a blue plastic bag used by detectives to collect evidence. The insider alleged that Fuhrman picked the glove up with a stick made of a piece of wood broken off the back fence of Nicole Brown Simpson’s Bundy residence. Naturally, Singular was astonished by such claims and asked how could such allegations be proven. The insider told him that the police took photos of the glove and near the glove in the photo you will find a piece of the blue plastic evidence bag. Under a somewhat feeble cross examination 7 months later in February 1995, Det. Tom Lange would ultimately admit to seeing a piece of blue plastic near the glove. I use the word feeble as best to reflect on the subsequent anger Singular would have with Simpson’s own “Dream Team” that he took chances to help reveal this corruption. The stick used to carry the bloody glove was left on Simpson’s Rockingham property too, according to the LAPD insider, and would also be collected by the police as evidence found at the Simpson property. Singular asked the insider why they did not take this information directly to the police in Los Angeles, and was told that the level of corruption within the LAPD and the Los Angeles County justice apparatus in general was so insidious that officials within these departments could not be trusted.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 22:47
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He
Easy, took some of his blood in a vial and planted it.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 22:42
Subject: OJ simpson Died
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP with the blood draw is nuts. Has s/he never had her blood drawn? I have, many times, and it is never ever the kind of precise process claimed.
EDTA was found on the scene. Did OJ moonlight as a phlebotomist? How would this chemical preservative/ clearing agent appear on OJ’s socks?
Perhaps OJ and his team planted the EDTA evidence.
How? OJ’s blood happens to contain a chemical not found in humans but only found in vial containers?
Fuhrman was the first one on the scene at the home before anyone else . Fuhrman was on tape saying the n word repeatedly, saying cops have to lie; saying he planted evidence on black people before, and that he hated interracial relationships and this is from 1988. He told colleagues that he saw Nicole’s boobs or dated her before she died. Whether he was lying or not, he made some of his work colleagues very very uncomfortable and that’s why he was exposed. The book Legacy of Deception about the LAPD quotes an anonymous insider who says Furhman told colleagues he was going to set up OJ and that this would be his “big career moment”
He