Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PSA: there is a person that monitors the SBG Madison threads just to derail the discussion. The person has a vested interest in SBG. If you engage with this person, you are only helping her. She never makes any good points or backs up anything she’s saying except to link to the Madison video.
The reaction of almost every parent to SBG is at a minimum to question why this change was necessary. And then why it’s being implemented at a handful of schools. High school is when everything is really supposed to matter and FCPS should not be experimenting on some students and placing them at a disadvantage to other students when it comes to college admissions. I think this could lead to future lawsuits. I know many Madison parents with kids at OOS schools because their kids can’t get into VT or JMU. I don’t appreciate Madison admin and Reid making the college process harder and more stressful for our kids.
Where's the proof that Madison kids' grades are superficially lower than they otherwise would be? And that they have been shut out of schools that they would have been admitted to if they went to another FCPS school? Seems like you are anticipating a negative outcome that hasn't happened.
By your own statement, you ALREADY know people whose JMHS kids did not get into VT and JMU (under the former grading system that you prefer). So, the old grading system wasn't helping them get into those schools. And they made the choice to pay OOS tuition rather than go to ... gasp... GMU or VCU or CNU or UMW.
There are a LOT of kids all over northern VA that can't get into VT; less true for JMU, but yes, I know kids from other FCPS HSs that didn't get into JMU to the chagrin of their alumni parents. Life is tough all over and it's harder to get into many state schools. There are simply more people applying and the common app makes it easier to apply to more colleges.
Ultimately, it seems that you are worried about college admission for your kid, and whether s/he will be competitive. It's a legitimate concern... but can cross over into anxiety if you let it. At this point, do you have any evidence that your kid is being harmed? If it is just being applied this year, and the grades aren't final until the end of the year, how can you be so sure that your kid is disadvantaged?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PSA: there is a person that monitors the SBG Madison threads just to derail the discussion. The person has a vested interest in SBG. If you engage with this person, you are only helping her. She never makes any good points or backs up anything she’s saying except to link to the Madison video.
The reaction of almost every parent to SBG is at a minimum to question why this change was necessary. And then why it’s being implemented at a handful of schools. High school is when everything is really supposed to matter and FCPS should not be experimenting on some students and placing them at a disadvantage to other students when it comes to college admissions. I think this could lead to future lawsuits. I know many Madison parents with kids at OOS schools because their kids can’t get into VT or JMU. I don’t appreciate Madison admin and Reid making the college process harder and more stressful for our kids.
Where's the proof that Madison kids' grades are superficially lower than they otherwise would be? And that they have been shut out of schools that they would have been admitted to if they went to another FCPS school? Seems like you are anticipating a negative outcome that hasn't happened.
By your own statement, you ALREADY know people whose JMHS kids did not get into VT and JMU (under the former grading system that you prefer). So, the old grading system wasn't helping them get into those schools. And they made the choice to pay OOS tuition rather than go to ... gasp... GMU or VCU or CNU or UMW.
There are a LOT of kids all over northern VA that can't get into VT; less true for JMU, but yes, I know kids from other FCPS HSs that didn't get into JMU to the chagrin of their alumni parents. Life is tough all over and it's harder to get into many state schools. There are simply more people applying and the common app makes it easier to apply to more colleges.
Ultimately, it seems that you are worried about college admission for your kid, and whether s/he will be competitive. It's a legitimate concern... but can cross over into anxiety if you let it. At this point, do you have any evidence that your kid is being harmed? If it is just being applied this year, and the grades aren't final until the end of the year, how can you be so sure that your kid is disadvantaged?
Anonymous wrote:NP. Because this person says SBG doesn't affect their child's grades one way or the other, so it doesn't make sense they would be on here derailing the thread so often unless there was another interest they had in the discussion.
Anonymous wrote:PSA: there is a person that monitors the SBG Madison threads just to derail the discussion. The person has a vested interest in SBG. If you engage with this person, you are only helping her. She never makes any good points or backs up anything she’s saying except to link to the Madison video.
The reaction of almost every parent to SBG is at a minimum to question why this change was necessary. And then why it’s being implemented at a handful of schools. High school is when everything is really supposed to matter and FCPS should not be experimenting on some students and placing them at a disadvantage to other students when it comes to college admissions. I think this could lead to future lawsuits. I know many Madison parents with kids at OOS schools because their kids can’t get into VT or JMU. I don’t appreciate Madison admin and Reid making the college process harder and more stressful for our kids.
Anonymous wrote:NP. Because this person says SBG doesn't affect their child's grades one way or the other, so it doesn't make sense they would be on here derailing the thread so often unless there was another interest they had in the discussion.
Anonymous wrote:PSA: there is a person that monitors the SBG Madison threads just to derail the discussion. The person has a vested interest in SBG. If you engage with this person, you are only helping her. She never makes any good points or backs up anything she’s saying except to link to the Madison video.
The reaction of almost every parent to SBG is at a minimum to question why this change was necessary. And then why it’s being implemented at a handful of schools. High school is when everything is really supposed to matter and FCPS should not be experimenting on some students and placing them at a disadvantage to other students when it comes to college admissions. I think this could lead to future lawsuits. I know many Madison parents with kids at OOS schools because their kids can’t get into VT or JMU. I don’t appreciate Madison admin and Reid making the college process harder and more stressful for our kids.
Anonymous wrote:PSA: there is a person that monitors the SBG Madison threads just to derail the discussion. The person has a vested interest in SBG. If you engage with this person, you are only helping her. She never makes any good points or backs up anything she’s saying except to link to the Madison video.
The reaction of almost every parent to SBG is at a minimum to question why this change was necessary. And then why it’s being implemented at a handful of schools. High school is when everything is really supposed to matter and FCPS should not be experimenting on some students and placing them at a disadvantage to other students when it comes to college admissions. I think this could lead to future lawsuits. I know many Madison parents with kids at OOS schools because their kids can’t get into VT or JMU. I don’t appreciate Madison admin and Reid making the college process harder and more stressful for our kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does this lower grades? Only being assessed on major assignments is college-like. Someone said one mistake gives you a B on a test. That’s the part that’s confusing. And won’t colleges be comparing kids within the same school?
In my kid’s class 1 wrong is a B. 2 wrong is a C. Wrong in can be a paper where something underlined should have been italicized. Done once is a B. It goes down from there.
So they’ve raised the bar to get an A?
I think with the broad rubrics, it’s more subjective than ever before. I wouldn’t call it raising the bar. If anything, expectations are lower.
So it's both harder and easier. Makes sense.
Stfu. Clearly you don’t have high achieving kids that go there. If you don’t have kids there, skip the snark and listen. Maybe you’ll learn something.
Seems a little disrespectful/hysterical...
A little. I think you are overreaching. I don't see this post making headline news. 352 posts and this is all you can say is hysterical and disrespectful on an anonymous page that just involves writing? It also seems like both of these posters are against SBG. They aren't giving it any positives. I think you are the one overdramatizing. It's been respectful for the most part and it was implemented in a very disrespectful way just completely changing the grading with no notification from the year prior why or any reason why this was needed. My kid was at the school the year before this was implemented and nothing was said about a need to revamp grading and little was taught to parents or kids till people raised a fuss about it. The school just thought they could make this change without any input from parents and students whatsoever and they still haven't given a reason for the implementation. I call that disrespectful and a bit hysterical over a problem that didn't exist.
Seems like you’re using a different definition of those words than the rest of us.
It was disrespectful not to make parents and kids aware of this change before the new year. It was an overreaction to make a change to grading that was never a problem before and affects kids for all of their classes that are sent to colleges. Are you the person who doesn't even know the school teaches kids for four years?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does this lower grades? Only being assessed on major assignments is college-like. Someone said one mistake gives you a B on a test. That’s the part that’s confusing. And won’t colleges be comparing kids within the same school?
In my kid’s class 1 wrong is a B. 2 wrong is a C. Wrong in can be a paper where something underlined should have been italicized. Done once is a B. It goes down from there.
So they’ve raised the bar to get an A?
I have several kids at madison. Yes, in my experience, much harder now. There is no reason a small, technical issue done once should result in a B.
There is only one reason, equitable grading and closing the gap.
How is raising the bar “closing the gap” or eQuItAbLe grading?
Because when the poor performing students do well, say a C or B on a single assignment it sticks as their final grade. System intentionally confusing and convoluted to allow desired results.
If a student does well then what’s the issue with them getting a B or C?
Still waiting to hear from PP: if a student does well (AKA knows the content) why it’s an issue for them to get a B or C?
Because no one understands your question. Are you asking what’s wrong with getting a 2.0 or 3.0? Having a kid who recently applied to college, I can tell you that you’re not getting into VT or any similar school with that type of gpa
Recap of convo:
Q: How is this “closing the gap”?
A: Poor performing students might do well and get a B or C
Q: why is this an issue?
?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does this lower grades? Only being assessed on major assignments is college-like. Someone said one mistake gives you a B on a test. That’s the part that’s confusing. And won’t colleges be comparing kids within the same school?
In my kid’s class 1 wrong is a B. 2 wrong is a C. Wrong in can be a paper where something underlined should have been italicized. Done once is a B. It goes down from there.
So they’ve raised the bar to get an A?
I think with the broad rubrics, it’s more subjective than ever before. I wouldn’t call it raising the bar. If anything, expectations are lower.
So it's both harder and easier. Makes sense.
Stfu. Clearly you don’t have high achieving kids that go there. If you don’t have kids there, skip the snark and listen. Maybe you’ll learn something.
Seems a little disrespectful/hysterical...
A little. I think you are overreaching. I don't see this post making headline news. 352 posts and this is all you can say is hysterical and disrespectful on an anonymous page that just involves writing? It also seems like both of these posters are against SBG. They aren't giving it any positives. I think you are the one overdramatizing. It's been respectful for the most part and it was implemented in a very disrespectful way just completely changing the grading with no notification from the year prior why or any reason why this was needed. My kid was at the school the year before this was implemented and nothing was said about a need to revamp grading and little was taught to parents or kids till people raised a fuss about it. The school just thought they could make this change without any input from parents and students whatsoever and they still haven't given a reason for the implementation. I call that disrespectful and a bit hysterical over a problem that didn't exist.
Seems like you’re using a different definition of those words than the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does this lower grades? Only being assessed on major assignments is college-like. Someone said one mistake gives you a B on a test. That’s the part that’s confusing. And won’t colleges be comparing kids within the same school?
In my kid’s class 1 wrong is a B. 2 wrong is a C. Wrong in can be a paper where something underlined should have been italicized. Done once is a B. It goes down from there.
So they’ve raised the bar to get an A?
I think with the broad rubrics, it’s more subjective than ever before. I wouldn’t call it raising the bar. If anything, expectations are lower.
So it's both harder and easier. Makes sense.
Stfu. Clearly you don’t have high achieving kids that go there. If you don’t have kids there, skip the snark and listen. Maybe you’ll learn something.
Seems a little disrespectful/hysterical...
A little. I think you are overreaching. I don't see this post making headline news. 352 posts and this is all you can say is hysterical and disrespectful on an anonymous page that just involves writing? It also seems like both of these posters are against SBG. They aren't giving it any positives. I think you are the one overdramatizing. It's been respectful for the most part and it was implemented in a very disrespectful way just completely changing the grading with no notification from the year prior why or any reason why this was needed. My kid was at the school the year before this was implemented and nothing was said about a need to revamp grading and little was taught to parents or kids till people raised a fuss about it. The school just thought they could make this change without any input from parents and students whatsoever and they still haven't given a reason for the implementation. I call that disrespectful and a bit hysterical over a problem that didn't exist.
So YOU don't have a kid at the school now? But you are really involved in this???