Looks like Kevin’s PR camp has found this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

Public policy doesn't allow for contracts with unconscionable terms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

You are guessing wrong. The prenup requirement for her to leave his house was just upheld by a judge yesterday. That ruling goes a long way to showing that the court is likely to uphold the rest of the prenup. Which include her paying his legal fees for challenging the prenup.

She is getting bad legal advice to think she could overturn the prenup.

I am PP and I guess it's good I am not a California divorce lawyer. My instincts are wrong here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

You are guessing wrong. The prenup requirement for her to leave his house was just upheld by a judge yesterday. That ruling goes a long way to showing that the court is likely to uphold the rest of the prenup. Which include her paying his legal fees for challenging the prenup.

She is getting bad legal advice to think she could overturn the prenup.

My DH's was more than willing to keep his ex in a great lifestyle, she is the mother of his two children. The problem as I understand it, from him (I came into the picture once he was single) is that she played dirty games along the way once he decided to leave. Mind games with the children, mind games with his family, hiding money (which he stumbled onto by accident while still married) lied about trips she would take while he was traveling for business, basically destroyed his view of her as a person. He saw her more clearly in divorce and began to resent how much advantage she had taken of him. Honestly, as a woman, I am often befuddled by the men (family) in my life and the sh t they don't see their wives do with their little women games, it's amusing really. Anyway, maybe that's why he's being so calloused, perhaps he knows things we can't see. Who knows? I'm on the side of always putting the children and they're mental health above all else, but who knows?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

The contract was signed many decades - and a bunch of kids - ago. A lifetime ago, basically. It seems petty, mean, and weird for him to be stingy like this - and yes, it looks very stingy - toward the mother of his children, who spent decades with him. Who shared a life with him!

You seem to believe your position is very popular but I don't actually see anyone else on this thread sharing it, which maybe says it's not so popular. No she doesn't have to come out with $200 million - but $1 million? Our house is worth almost that and we live in a ranch that needs work, on a busy street, in a mid-tier city.

It just seems mean, small, and petty. Regardless of the prenup - which I am guessing will be adjusted by the court, if they don't settle - she should at least be able to buy a decent house where she and the kids can live. And to maintain the house. You know, to live a life that is fairly comparable to the one she had when she was married to this cheater for a few decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

You're making a good point that some people just view marriage and children as a "contract," nothing more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

DP. Legally that’s all fine and good. Morally, if he has actually been cheating left and right as has been rumored it seems a bit hypocritical to break what most people view as part of the whole marriage deal and then try and demonize her for not wanting to do the same. I don’t think she should get wealthy but I do think she should get enough to purchase a place in the neighborhood the kids already live in. 1.5 million is not going to do it. He made a big point of saying the kids aren’t evicted with the mom which…is good. But practically how does that work when he is gone for months at a time for work?

And if it turns out that she’s the one who has been cheating, as rumored?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

No. There is a large faction of people who think spouses and children should be treated with love and respect and fairness. If for some reason the marriage doesn't work out, then put your family first.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

Sure you are a new poster. 🙄

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

DP. Legally that’s all fine and good. Morally, if he has actually been cheating left and right as has been rumored it seems a bit hypocritical to break what most people view as part of the whole marriage deal and then try and demonize her for not wanting to do the same. I don’t think she should get wealthy but I do think she should get enough to purchase a place in the neighborhood the kids already live in. 1.5 million is not going to do it. He made a big point of saying the kids aren’t evicted with the mom which…is good. But practically how does that work when he is gone for months at a time for work?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

How is he being vindictive and immature? They signed a contract that laid out the terms if the marriage ended. The wife filed for divorce so the contract now goes into effect.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

In what way? Is marriage supposed to make women rich? What is she giving to him after 18 years of marriage? What does he get out of it? So far it seems she gained a great deal more than he has.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.

NP, after 18 years of marriage, he is behaving like a vindictive and immature jerk!

Anonymous wrote:Sure, he has a prenup that his lawyers will make sure is enforced. But after 18 yrs of marriage, I suppose the question is of decency, currently he is coming across as a really mean and nasty person.

It’s sounds decent to the large majority.

There is a slim faction of people who think divorce is like the lottery and you win a big sum of money through divorce and that is a disordered way of thinking.