Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video got prurient views - not fan views

Rainn Wilson:

"I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with most of what Tucker Carlson said in that video".

Even leftist Hollywood seems to be shifting.

Yes what did those leftist commies Arnold Schwarzenegger and Clint Eastwood say?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The video got prurient views - not fan views

Rainn Wilson:

"I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with most of what Tucker Carlson said in that video".

Even leftist Hollywood seems to be shifting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:None of this is passing the smell test. I'm not convinced this isn't a Murdoch and/or some right wing think tank ruse. He gives a "viral" speech the weekend before he's sacked. It's leaked his pal Lachlan made the decision? The back and forth from "sources" in the tabloids. The old man was worried Tucker is starting to sound too religious.

Murdochs know cable TV is dying and to my knowledge, they have nobody in the podcast/streaming space to gatekeep that younger demo? Solution: Create a fired "martyr" who is actually a company man hack.

If the Murdochs really wanted this preppy dork to be a nobody overnight, blacklist him from coverage at FN, Post and Daily Mail. And make him sit home and do nothing for a few years while he rides out the rest of his contract. Instead Daily Mail is outside of his Florida compound this week to catch a lovey-dovey photo op? And watch a buyout will happen soon, so he can quickly launch his totally independent online streaming program. And even Matt is plugged into to what Tucker has "planned" two days after he was "fired" and before he knows if he'll be bought out? Right.

Leftspeak for "this backfired on us so clearly this was PLANNED

Anonymous wrote:None of this is passing the smell test. I'm not convinced this isn't a Murdoch and/or some right wing think tank ruse. He gives a "viral" speech the weekend before he's sacked. It's leaked his pal Lachlan made the decision? The back and forth from "sources" in the tabloids. The old man was worried Tucker is starting to sound too religious.

Murdochs know cable TV is dying and to my knowledge, they have nobody in the podcast/streaming space to gatekeep that younger demo? Solution: Create a fired "martyr" who is actually a company man hack.

If the Murdochs really wanted this preppy dork to be a nobody overnight, blacklist him from coverage at FN, Post and Daily Mail. And make him sit home and do nothing for a few years while he rides out the rest of his contract. Instead Daily Mail is outside of his Florida compound this week to catch a lovey-dovey photo op? And watch a buyout will happen soon, so he can quickly launch his totally independent online streaming program. And even Matt is plugged into to what Tucker has "planned" two days after he was "fired" and before he knows if he'll be bought out? Right.

Anonymous wrote:The video got prurient views - not fan views

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He said nothing new, didn’t outline any of his future plans, and may have turned off newly-interested folks with this cringy abstract thesis about one-party rule and lack of debate (from a hack who made a fortune on a dumb debate show). It was a perfect opportunity to give the people some meat but it just came across as a limp-wristed introduction to capitalize on some new publicity. Does this look like a burgeoning political firebrand to you or a washed up greedy guy hoping to pivot and get a piece of that Rogan and Conan money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They fired him because he’s been mailing it in and he had no advertisers. They can put any random empty suit in that chair and get Cadillac, Mercedes, Visa and big pharma to buy spots.

Is that your final final answer?

62 MILLION VIEWS

It's not surprising this is getting a lot of views right after his firing was a huge part of the news cycle. It's also been posted everywhere and depending on your Twitter feed - multiple times.

Let's see what happens in 90 days. Tucker has a lot of disadvantages and over the years he's also been fired by CNN, MSNBC, and PBS. Fox was an anomaly for him in terms of success.

I agree. This guy is not bouncing back.

His video got more views than all of cable news combined.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They fired him because he’s been mailing it in and he had no advertisers. They can put any random empty suit in that chair and get Cadillac, Mercedes, Visa and big pharma to buy spots.

Is that your final final answer?

62 MILLION VIEWS

It's not surprising this is getting a lot of views right after his firing was a huge part of the news cycle. It's also been posted everywhere and depending on your Twitter feed - multiple times.

Let's see what happens in 90 days. Tucker has a lot of disadvantages and over the years he's also been fired by CNN, MSNBC, and PBS. Fox was an anomaly for him in terms of success.

I agree. This guy is not bouncing back.