jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
Taibbi's tweets are a bit hard to follow but this part is reasonably clear:
No government involvement in the laptop story. I.E. the story was not blocked due to FBI advice.
The decision was made by Twitter employees.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
Taibbi's tweets are a bit hard to follow but this part is reasonably clear:
No government involvement in the laptop story. I.E. the story was not blocked due to FBI advice.
The decision was made by Twitter employees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now "#TwitterFiles2" is trending, with Bari Weiss breathlessly posting a thread about "OMG, WE DISCOVERED A SECRET BLACKLIST!!!!1!"
While the rest of us are "yawn, that's the shadowbans, the world has known about that for a long time already."
Yet more proof Twitter was taken over by clueless noobs.
Bari Weiss isn’t exactly an intellectual heavyweight.
Anonymous wrote:So now "#TwitterFiles2" is trending, with Bari Weiss breathlessly posting a thread about "OMG, WE DISCOVERED A SECRET BLACKLIST!!!!1!"
While the rest of us are "yawn, that's the shadowbans, the world has known about that for a long time already."
Yet more proof Twitter was taken over by clueless noobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
In addition to the fact that even Taibbi specially says the FBI had no involvement here, as far I can tell, it is still very much an open question as to whether this laptop has hacked materials on it. The news analyses have concluded that some of the material is authentic, but that doesn't mean it wasn't retrieved in a hack and then put on the laptop. And those same analyses have shown that some of the material was definitely put on there after the fact.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
In addition to the fact that even Taibbi specially says the FBI had no involvement here, as far I can tell, it is still very much an open question as to whether this laptop has hacked materials on it. The news analyses have concluded that some of the material is authentic, but that doesn't mean it wasn't retrieved in a hack and then put on the laptop. And those same analyses have shown that some of the material was definitely put on there after the fact.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Before you said Twitter wasn't biased and was following their policies. It was FBI that told them to be on the lookout for hacked materials and disinformation.
Even though they had the laptop for a year and knew it wasn't hacked.
So was Twitter censoring it due to their own bias, or because of FBI advice?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.
That is the primary invented story. Reality has not lived up to it. The Twitter Files are turning out to be a bigger bellyflop than the Durham investigation.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:From Defector.com:
This is primarily a story of government working against political enemies.