Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garland, he is accused of not doing enough against Trump and also accused of not doing enough against Hunter. Now he makes a move against trump. What do people think is going to happen when republicans take over the house? I don’t think democrats are thinking this through. Plus now at mid terms, Trump is getting all this air time and now his base is getting all riled up. Poor poor chess move.
So you are saying the republicans in the house will use their power to attempt to interfere with a lawful investigation of a federal crime? And you think that’s a good thing?
Anonymous wrote:“An FBI raid on a former president sets a dangerous precedent by implying the rule of law applies equally to everyone.”
Except H. Biden, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton. Until the next republican is elected president of course! Haha.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That’s a great thread.
And put my money on: Trump has been selling the highest state secrets to our enemies.
The only thing that would surprise me about that is if he was paying enough attention to briefings or docs to even know what the state secrets are.
Anonymous wrote:Be careful cheering on the witch hunt, one day they may be hunting you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to do that you need a warrant. To get a warrant you have to show reasonable cause.Anonymous wrote:that FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago and looked in every single office, safe, and grabbed documents and boxes without going through them on the property. They took boxes and documents to go through them later.
No matter your politics, no one has an issue with this? The police taking stuff just to see if anything is there? Wow.
Warrants are very specific, you can not take everything "just in case"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to do that you need a warrant. To get a warrant you have to show reasonable cause.Anonymous wrote:that FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago and looked in every single office, safe, and grabbed documents and boxes without going through them on the property. They took boxes and documents to go through them later.
No matter your politics, no one has an issue with this? The police taking stuff just to see if anything is there? Wow.
Warrants are very specific, you can not take everything "just in case"
Anonymous wrote:
Exactly! That fact there are counterintelligence implications is HUGE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:to do that you need a warrant. To get a warrant you have to show reasonable cause.Anonymous wrote:that FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago and looked in every single office, safe, and grabbed documents and boxes without going through them on the property. They took boxes and documents to go through them later.
No matter your politics, no one has an issue with this? The police taking stuff just to see if anything is there? Wow.
Warrants are very specific, you can not take everything "just in case"
Anonymous wrote:The GOP is quite the law and order party, eh?
Anonymous wrote:to do that you need a warrant. To get a warrant you have to show reasonable cause.Anonymous wrote:that FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago and looked in every single office, safe, and grabbed documents and boxes without going through them on the property. They took boxes and documents to go through them later.
No matter your politics, no one has an issue with this? The police taking stuff just to see if anything is there? Wow.